Advertisement

Adapting Learning Activities Selection in an Intelligent Tutoring System to Affect

  • Chinasa Odo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10948)

Abstract

My PhD focuses on adapting learning activities selection to learner affect in an intelligent tutoring system. The research aims to investigate the affective states considered for adapting learning activity selection, and how to adapt to these. It also seeks to know how learner’s affective state can be obtained through tutor-learner interaction rather than via sensors or questionnaires. The research will use of a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods to achieve these aims. This research will significantly contribute to the area of intelligent tutoring technology by providing more insights into how to adapt to affective states, and improve the delivery of learning. The result will lead to an algorithm for learning activity selection based on affect, which also incorporates other relevant learner characteristics, such as personalty, that moderate affect.

Keywords

Affective state Learning activity selection Personalization 

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, R.S.J., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Xolocotzin, U.E.: The dynamics of affective transitions in simulation problem-solving environments. In: Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 666–677. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohn, M.A., Fredrickson, B.L., Brown, S.L., Mikels, J.A., Conway, A.M.: Happiness unpacked: positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion (Wash. D.C.) 9(3), 361–368 (2009). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19485613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. J. Educ. Media 29(3), 241–250 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Mello, S., Picard, R., Graesser, A.: Towards an affect-sensitive AutoTutor. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(4), 53–61 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O.C., Manouselis, N.: Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 421–451. Springer, Boston (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forgas, J.P., Eich, E.: Affective influences on cognition mood congruence, mood dependence, and mood effects on processing strategies. In: Weiner, I.B. (ed.) Handbook of Psychology, Chap. 3, pp. 61–82. Wiley, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goetz, T., Athan, N., Hall, C.: Emotion and Achievement in the Classroom. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graesser, A., D’Mello, S., Chipman, P., King, B., McDaniel, B.: Exploring relationships between affect and learning with AutoTutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 12(1), 257–279 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kruglanski, A.W., Forgas, J.P.: Attitudes and attitude change frontier of social psychology. In: Crano, W.D., Prislin, R. (ed.) Frontiers of Social Psycology, Chap. 3. Psychology press Taylor and Francis group (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehman, B., Matthews, M., D’Mello, S., Person, N.: What are you feeling? Investigating student affective states during expert human tutoring sessions. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 50–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Duval, E.: Recommender Systems for Learning - An Introduction, 1st edn. Springer, New York (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4361-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masthoff, J.: The user as wizard: a method for early involvement in the design and evaluation of adaptive systems. In: Fifth Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, pp. 460–469 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDaniel, B., D’Mello, S., King, B., Chipman, P., Tapp, K., Graesser, A., Edu, G.: Facial features for affective state detection in learning environments. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 29 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okpo, J., Masthoff, J., Dennis, M., Beacham, N., Ciocarlan, A.: Investigating the impact of personality and cognitive efficiency on the selection of exercises for learners. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization - UMAP 2017, pp. 140–147 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37(2), 91–106 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Picard, R.W.: Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Psotka, J., Massey, L.D.L.D., Mutter, S.A.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tyng, C.M., Amin, H.U., Saad, M.N.M., Malik, A.S.: The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Front. Psychol. 8, 1454 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Ochoa, X., Wolpers, M., Drachsler, H., Bosnic, I., Duval, E.: Context-aware recommender systems for learning: a survey and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 6(1), 318–335 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations