Skip to main content

Control of Variables Strategy Across Phases of Inquiry in Virtual Labs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10948))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Control of Variables Strategy (CVS) is the process of isolating the effect of single variables when conducting scientific inquiry. We assess how CVS can help student achieve different levels of understanding when implemented in different parts of the inquiry process. 148 students worked with minimally-guided inquiry activities using virtual labs on two different physics topics. The virtual labs allowed for exploration, data collection, and graphical analysis. Using student log data, we identified how CVS manifests itself through these phases of students’ inquiry process. We found that students using CVS during data collection and plotting was associated with students achieving more qualitative and quantitative models, respectively. This did not hold, however, for more complicated mathematical relationships, emphasizing the importance of mathematical and graphical interpretation skills when doing CVS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wierzchula, M., Blikstein, P.: Learning environments and inquiry behaviors in science inquiry learning: how their interplay affects the development of conceptual understanding in physics. In: International Educational Data Mining Society, pp. 61–68 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, Z., Klahr, D.: All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Dev. 70(5), 1098–1120 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreeement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20(1), 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Jong, T.: Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science 312, 532–533 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Jong, T., Van Joolingen, W.R.: Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev. Educ. Res. 68(2), 179–201 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobert, J.D.: Microworlds. In: Gunstone, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Science Education, p. 638. Springer, Dordrecht (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McHugh, M.L.: Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 22, 276–282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L.A., De Jong, T., van Riesen, S.A.N., Kamp, E.T., Manoli, C.C., Zacharia, Z.C., Tsourlidaki, E.: Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 47–61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perez, S., Massey-Allard, J., Butler, D., Ives, J., Bonn, D., Yee, N., Roll, I.: Identifying productive inquiry in virtual labs using sequence mining. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 287–298. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., Perkins, K., Bonn, D.: Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: the relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours in inquiry learning. Instr. Sci. 46, 1–28 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sao Pedro, M.A., Gobert, J.D., Raziuddin, J.J.: Comparing pedagogical approaches for the acquisition and long-term robustness of the control of variables strategy. J. Learn. Sci., 1024–1031 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schwichow, M., Croker, S., Zimmerman, C., Höffler, T., Härtig, H.: Teaching the control-of-variables strategy: a meta-analysis. Dev. Rev. 39, 37–63 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wieman, C.E., Adams, W.K., Perkins, K.K.: PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science 322, 682–683 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Perez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perez, S. et al. (2018). Control of Variables Strategy Across Phases of Inquiry in Virtual Labs. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93845-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93846-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics