Advertisement

Sentiment Analysis of Student Evaluations of Teaching

  • Heather NewmanEmail author
  • David JoynerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10948)

Abstract

We used a sentiment analysis tool, VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner), to analyze Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET) of a single course from three different sources: official evaluations, forum comments from another course, and an unofficial “reviews” site maintained by students. We compared the positive and negative valences of these sites; identified frequently-used key words in SET comments and determined the impact on positivity/negativity of comments that included them; and determined positive/negative values by question on the official course SET comments. Many universities use similar questions, which may make this research useful for those analyzing comments at other institutions. Previous published studies of sentiment analysis in SET settings are rare.

Keywords

Sentiment analysis Student evaluation of teaching Course evaluations Natural language processing 

References

  1. 1.
    Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SENTIWORDNET 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010, Valletta, Malta, 17–23 May 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.: Vader: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marsh, H.W., Roche, L.A.: Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: the critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Am. Psychol. 52(11), 1187 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uttl, B., White, C., Gonzalez, D.: Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Stud. Educ. Eval. 54, 22–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., Stark, P.B.: Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen Res. 10 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim, S.D., Lee, J., Park, H.S., Yu, J., Lee, K.Y., Sohn, I.S., Lee, R.: Experience and consideration on online course evaluation by medical students. Korean J. Med. Educ. 20(4), 367–371 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2008.20.4.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Halees, A.: Mining opinions in user-generated contents to improve course evaluation. In: Zain, J.M., Wan Mohd, W.M., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds.) ICSECS 2011. CCIS, vol. 180, pp. 107–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations