Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Evolution of Primate Social Cognition pp 129–141Cite as

Comparative Economics: Using Experimental Economic Paradigms to Understand Primate Social Decision-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Evolution Research ((IDER,volume 5))

Abstract

One of the goals of studying primate social cognition is to better understand how decision-making is similar or different across primate species, including humans. Recently, researchers have begun to use paradigms from experimental economics that allow for direct comparisons across species using identical or highly similar experimental approaches. In many cases, paradigms used extensively in humans, such as the Assurance Game, Matching Pennies Game, and Prisoner’s Dilemma, have been adapted for other species in order to understand how different payoff structures influence decision-making. This approach has been utilized to explore not only individual differences and the influence of the social environment on behavior, but also the ecological relevance of such paradigms to the species in question. This comprehensive exploration allows for the most robust understanding of the evolution and development of social decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belot M, Crawford VP, Heyes C (2013) Players of matching pennies automatically imitate opponents’ gestures against strong incentives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2763–2768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C, Boesch H (1989) Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Tai national park. Am J Phys Anthropol 75:547–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2006) Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Soc Justice Res 19:153–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2013) Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(Suppl 2):10416–10423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2002) A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Hum Nat 13:129–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2014) Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science 346:1251776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Freeman C, de Waal FBM (2006) Partner’s behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol 68:713–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Parrish AE, Beran MJ et al (2011) Responses to the assurance game in monkeys, apes, and humans using equivalent procedures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3442–3447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Wilson BJ, Beran MJ (2012) Old world monkeys are more similar to humans than new world monkeys when playing a coordination game. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:1522–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Beran MJ, Parrish AE et al (2013) Comparative approaches to studying strategy: towards an evolutionary account of primate decision making. Evol Psychol 11:606–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Price SA, Leverett K, Prétôt L, Beran M, Wilson BJ (2017) Human and monkey responses in a symmetric game of conflict with asymmetric equilibria. J Econ Behav Organ 142:293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger AF, Wyman E, Melis AP, Tomasello M (2011) Coordination of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a stag hunt game. Int J Primatol 32:1296–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, van Schaik C (2013) Group service in macaques (Macaca fuscata), capuchins (Cebus apella) and marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): a comparative approach to identifying proactive prosocial motivations. J Comp Psychol 127:212–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R, Bird G, Lunser G et al (2012) Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:780–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofoot MC, Rubenstein DI, Maiya AS, Berger-Wolf TY (2011) Aggression, grooming and group-level cooperation in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus): insights from social networks. Am J Primatol 73:821–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (2000) Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 60:253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM, Berger ML (2000) Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature 404:563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM, Davis JM (2003) Capuchin cognitive ecology: cooperation based on projected returns. Neuropsychologia 41:221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deaner RO, van Schaik CP, Johnson V (2006) Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evol Psychol 4:149–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1997) Cooperation among animals: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguid S, Wyman E, Bullinger AF et al (2014) Coordination strategies of chimpanzees and human children in a stag hunt game. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20141973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann JM, Herrmann E (2016) Chimpanzees trust their friends. Curr Biol 26(2):252–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann JM, Herrmann E, Tomasello M (2015) Chimpanzees trust conspecifics to engage in low-cost reciprocity. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20142803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories. In: Kolm S-C, Ythier JM (eds) Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 615–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall K, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ, Brosnan SF (2015) Chimpanzees respond differently to inequity based on relative food values. In: Abstracts of the 38th annual meeting of the American society of primatologists, Bend, 17–20 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroush K, Williams ZM (2015) Neuronal prediction of opponent’s behavior during cooperative social interchange in primates. Cell 160:1233–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S et al (2001) In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev 91:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Tomasello M, Call J (2007) Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318:107–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser I, Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2012) Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness. Biol Lett 8:942–945

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lau B, Glimcher PW (2005) Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 84:555–579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Halpern JY (2012) Coevolution of learning and data-acquisition mechanisms: a model for cognitive evolution. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:2686–2694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CF, Bhui R, Bossaerts P et al (2014) Chimpanzee choice rates in competitive games match equilibrium game theory predictions. Sci Rep 4:5182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2008) Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favours? Anim Behav 76:951–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendres KA, de Waal FBM (2000) Capuchins do cooperate: the advantage of an intuitive task. Anim Behav 60:523–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (2013) Chimps play fair in the ultimatum game. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:1978–1979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish AE, Brosnan SF, Beran BJ, Würsig MJ (2014) Differential responding by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens) to variable outcomes in the assurance game. Anim Behav Cogn 1:215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry S (2003) Coalitionary aggression in white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. In: de FBM W, Tyack P (eds) Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture and individualized societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prétôt L, Bshary R, Brosnan SF (2016) Comparing species’ decisions in a dichotomous choice task: adjusting task parameters improves performance in monkeys. Anim Cogn 19(4):819–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor D, Williamson RA, de Waal FBM, Brosnan SF (2013) Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2070–2075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Salwiczek LH, Prétôt L, Demarta L et al (2012) Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orangutans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner – client reef fish cooperation. PLoS One 7:e49068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Santos LR, Rosati AG (2015) The evolutionary roots of human decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 66:321–347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G (2007) Grooming and agonistic support: a meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism. Behav Ecol 18:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Kearns D (2009) Memory for the order of briefly presented numerals in humans as a function of practice. Anim Cogn 12:405–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Silberberg A (2010) Rational maximizing by humans (Homo sapiens) in an ultimatum game. Anim Cogn 13:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MF, Watzek J, Brosnan SF (2018) The importance of a truly comparative methodology for comparative psychology. Int J Comp Psychol 31. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6x91j98x

  • Stevens JR, Hauser MD (2004) Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 8:60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suchak M, Eppley TM, Campbell MW, de Waal FBM (2014) Ape duos and trios: spontaneous cooperation with free partner choice in chimpanzees. PeerJ 2:e417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Watzek J, Rossettie MS, Raines AR, Brosnan SF (2015) More for me, less for you: capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) responses to inequity in a group setting. Paper presented at the 52nd annual conference of the animal behavior society, Anchorage, 10–14 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao E, Houser D (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7398–7401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Julia Watzek, Mackenzie F. Smith & Sarah F. Brosnan

  2. Department of Philosophy, Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Sarah F. Brosnan

Authors
  1. Julia Watzek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mackenzie F. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah F. Brosnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah F. Brosnan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Georg-August-University Goettingen, Lichtenberg-Kolleg, Göttingen, Germany

    Laura Desirèe Di Paolo

  2. Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienzà Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

    Fabio Di Vincenzo

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, MI, USA

    Francesca De Petrillo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Watzek, J., Smith, M.F., Brosnan, S.F. (2018). Comparative Economics: Using Experimental Economic Paradigms to Understand Primate Social Decision-Making. In: Di Paolo, L.D., Di Vincenzo, F., De Petrillo, F. (eds) Evolution of Primate Social Cognition. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93776-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation