Skip to main content

Abstract

The theory of majorization is perhaps most remarkable for its simplicity. How can such a simple concept be useful in so many diverse fields? The plethora of synonyms or quasi-synonyms for variability (diversity, inequality, spread, etc.) suggest that we are dealing with a basic conception which is multifaceted in manifestation and not susceptible to a brief definition which will command universal acceptance. Yet there is an aspect of inequality which comes close to the elusive universal acceptance. The names associated with this identifiable component of inequality are several. Effectively, several authors happened upon the same concept in different contexts. Any list will probably do injustice to some group of early researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vilfredo_Pareto.gif.

  2. 2.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robin_Hood_Memorial.jpg.

References

  • Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., & Polya, G. (1929). Some simple inequalities satisfied by convex functions. Messenger of Mathematics, 58, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., & Polya, G. (1959). Inequalities. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publication of the American Statistical Association, 9, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. W., Olkin, I., & Arnold, B. C. (2011). Inequalities: Theory of majorization and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, R. F. (1903). Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of symmetric algebraic functions of n letters. Proceedings of Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 21, 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, I. (1923). Uber eine klasse von mittelbildungen mit anwendungen die determinaten. Theorie Sitzungsber Berlin Math. Gesellschaft, 22, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arnold, B.C., Sarabia, J.M. (2018). Introduction. In: Majorization and the Lorenz Order with Applications in Applied Mathematics and Economics. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93773-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics