A Versatile Hybrid Agent-Based, Particle and Partial Differential Equations Method to Analyze Vascular Adaptation

  • Marc Garbey
  • Stefano Casarin
  • Scott Berceli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10861)


Failure of peripheral endovascular interventions occurs at the intersection of vascular biology, biomechanics, and clinical decision making. It is our hypothesis that most of the endovascular treatments share the same driving mechanisms during post-surgical follow-up, and accordingly, a deep understanding of them is mandatory in order to improve the current surgical outcome. This work presents a versatile model of vascular adaptation post vein graft bypass intervention to treat arterial occlusions. The goal is to improve the computational models developed so far by effectively modeling the cell-cell and cell-membrane interactions that are recognized to be pivotal elements for the re-organization of the graft’s structure. A numerical method is here designed to combine the best features of an Agent-Based Model and a Partial Differential Equations model in order to get as close as possible to the physiological reality while keeping the implementation both simple and general.


Vascular adaptation Particle model Immersed Boundary Method PDE model 


  1. 1.
    Go, A.S., American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129(3), e228–e292 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiang, Z., et al.: A novel vein graft model: adaptation to differential flow environments. Am. J. Physiol. - Heart Circ. Physiol. 286(1), H240–H245 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roger, V.L., et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 125(1), e2–e220 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harskamp, R.E., et al.: Saphenous vein graft failure and clinical outcomes: toward a surro-gate end point in patients following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am. Heart J. 165, 639–643 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garbey, M., et al.: Vascular adaptation: pattern formation and cross validation between an agent based model and a dynamical system. J. Theoret. Biol. 429, 149–163 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garbey, M., et al.: A multiscale computational framework to understand vascular adaptation. J. Comput. Sci. 8, 32–47 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Casarin, S., et al.: Linking gene dynamics to vascular hyperplasia - toward a predictive model of vein graft adaptation. PLoS ONE 12(11), e0187606 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    White, F.T.: Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York City (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maas, S.A., et al.: FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 134(1), 011005 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao, W., et al.: On thick-walled cylinder under internal pressure. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 125, 267–273 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garbey, M., et al.: A multiscale, dynamical system that describes vein graft adaptation and failure. J. Theoret. Biol. 335, 209–220 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutsch, A., et al.: Cellular Automaton Modeling of Biological Pattern Formation. Birkhuser, Boston (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peskin, C.S.: The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 11, 479–517 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quaranta, V.: Cell migration through extracellular matrix: membrane-type metalloprotein-ases make the way. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1167–1170 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Humphrey, J.D., et al.: Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15(12), 802–812 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Browning, A.P., et al.: Inferring parameters for a lattice-free model of cell migration and proliferation using experimental data. J. Theoret. Biol. 437, 251–260 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Garbey
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stefano Casarin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Scott Berceli
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Houston Methodist Research InstituteHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHouston Methodist HospitalHoustonUSA
  3. 3.LaSIE, UMR CNRS 7356University of La RochelleLa RochelleFrance
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  5. 5.Malcom Randall VAMCGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations