Advertisement

Towards Model-Based Policy Elaboration on City Scale Using Game Theory: Application to Ambulance Dispatching

  • Sergey V. Kovalchuk
  • Mariia A. Moskalenko
  • Alexey N. Yakovlev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10860)

Abstract

The paper presents early results on the development of a generalized approach for modeling and analysis of the interaction of multiple stakeholders in city environment while providing services to citizens under the regulation of city authorities. The approach considers the interaction between main stakeholders (organizations of various kind, citizens, and city authorities) including information and finances exchange, activities taken and services or goods provided. The developed approach is based on a combination of game-theoretic modeling and simulation of service providers interaction. Such combination enables consideration of confronting stakeholders as well as determined (e.g., scheduled) and stochastic variation in characteristics of system’s elements. The goal of this approach development is supporting of analysis and optimization of city-level regulation through legislative, financial, and informational interaction with organizations and environment of a city. An example of ambulance dispatching during providing emergent care for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients is considered. The example is analyzed in a simplified linear case and in practical application to dispatching ambulances providing service for ACS patients in Saint Petersburg.

Keywords

Game theory Queueing theory Discrete-event simulation Policy making Ambulance dispatching Acute coronary syndrome 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by The Russian Scientific Foundation, Agreement #14-11-00823 (15.07.2014).

References

  1. 1.
    Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C.: Smart city and value creation. In: Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (eds.) Smart City. PI, pp. 1–12. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandrola, J.: Doctor Doesn’t Always Know Best. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/849689
  3. 3.
    Brown, M.M., Brown, G.C.: Update on value-based medicine. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 24, 183–189 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCain, R.A., Hamilton, R., Linnehan, F.: The problem of emergency department overcrowding: agent-based simulation and test by questionnaire. In: Osinga, S., Hofstede, G., Verwaart, T. (eds.) Emergent Results of Artificial Economics. LNE, vol. 652, pp. 91–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deo, S., Gurvich, I.: Centralized vs. decentralized ambulance diversion: a network perspective. Manag. Sci. 57, 1300–1319 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu, C.-K., Chen, Y.-M., Wu, D.: A game theory approach for deploying medical resources in emergency department. In: Li, D.-F., Yang, X.-G., Uetz, M., Xu, G.-J. (eds.) China-Dutch GTA/China GTA -2016. CCIS, vol. 758, pp. 18–30. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6753-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kovalchuk, S.V., Krotov, E., Smirnov, P.A., Nasonov, D.A., Yakovlev, A.N.: Distributed data-driven platform for urgent decision making in cardiological ambulance control. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 79, 144–154 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Health in 2015: from MDGs, Millennium Development Goals to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moser, D.K., Kimble, L.P., Alberts, M.J., Alonzo, A., Croft, J.B., Dracup, K., Evenson, K.R., Go, A.S., Hand, M.M., Kothari, R.U., Mensah, G.A., Morris, D.L., Pancioli, A.M., Riegel, B., Zerwic, J.J.: Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on cardiovascular nursing and stroke council. Circulation 114, 168–182 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersson, T., Värbrand, P.: Decision support tools for ambulance dispatch and relocation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58, 195–201 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Repede, J.F., Bernardo, J.J.: Developing and validating a decision support system for locating emergency medical vehicles in Louisville, Kentucky. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 75, 567–581 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Derevitskiy, I., Krotov, E., Voloshin, D., Yakovlev, A., Kovalchuk, S.V., Karbovskii, V.: Simulation of emergency care for patients with ACS in Saint Petersburg for ambulance decision making. Procedia Comput. Sci. 108, 2210–2219 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ivanov, S.V., Kovalchuk, S.V., Boukhanovsky, A.V.: Workflow-based collaborative decision support for flood management systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 18, 2213–2222 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krikunov, A.V., Bolgova, E.V., Krotov, E., Abuhay, T.M., Yakovlev, A.N., Kovalchuk, S.V.: Complex data-driven predictive modeling in personalized clinical decision support for acute coronary syndrome episodes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 80, 518–529 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey V. Kovalchuk
    • 1
  • Mariia A. Moskalenko
    • 1
  • Alexey N. Yakovlev
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Almazov National Medical Research CentreSaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations