A Computational Model-Based Framework to Plan Clinical Experiments – An Application to Vascular Adaptation Biology

  • Stefano Casarin
  • Scott A. Berceli
  • Marc Garbey
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10860)


Several computational models have been developed in order to improve the outcome of Vein Graft Bypasses in response to arterial occlusions and they all share a common property: their accuracy relies on a winning choice of the coefficients’ value related to biological functions that drive them. Our goal is to optimize the retrieval of these unknown coefficients on the base of experimental data and accordingly, as biological experiments are noisy in terms of statistical analysis and the models are typically stochastic and complex, this work wants first to elucidate which experimental measurements might be sufficient to retrieve the targeted coefficients and second how many specimens would constitute a good dataset to guarantee a sufficient level of accuracy. Since experiments are often costly and time consuming, the planning stage is critical to the success of the operation and, on the base of this consideration, the present work shows how, thanks to an ad hoc use of a computational model of vascular adaptation, it is possible to estimate in advance the entity and the quantity of resources needed in order to efficiently reproduce the experimental reality.


Agent based model Experiment planning Virtual dataset 


  1. 1.
    Goldman, S., et al.: Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary arteries grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 44, 2149–2156 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manini, S., Passera, K., Huberts, W., Botti, L., Remuzzi, A.: Computational model for simulation of vascular adaptation following vascular access surgery in haemodialysis patients. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 17, 1358–1367 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klein, B., et al.: Hemodynamic influence on smooth muscle cell kinetics and phenotype during early vein graft adaptation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45, 644–655 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garbey, M., et al.: A dynamical system that describes vein graft adaptation and failure. J. Theor. Biol. 336, 209–220 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garbey, M., et al.: Vascular adaptation: pattern formation and cross validation between an agent based model and a dynamical system. J. Theor. Biol. 429, 149–163 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casarin, S., et al.: Linking gene dynamics to intimal hyperplasia – a predictive model of vein graft adaptation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 108, 1842–1851 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marino, S., Hogue, I.B., Ray, C.J., Kirschner, D.E.: A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J. Theor. Biol. 254, 178–196 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Owens, C.D., Gasper, W.J., Rahman, A.S., Conte, M.S.: Vein graft failure. J. Vasc. Surg. 61, 203–216 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casarin, S., Berceli, S.A., Garbey, M.: Linking gene dynamics to vascular hyperplasia – toward a predictive model of vein graft adaptation. PLoS One 12(11), e0187606 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pries, A.R., Secomb, T.W., Gaehtgens, P.: Structural autoregulation of terminal vascular beds. Hypertension 33, 153–161 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poleszczuk, J., Macklin, P., Enderling, H.: Agent-based modeling of cancer stem cell driven solid tumor growth. Methods Mol. Biol. 1516, 335–346 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Casarin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Scott A. Berceli
    • 4
    • 5
  • Marc Garbey
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.LASIE UMR 7356 CNRS, University of La RochelleLa RochelleFrance
  2. 2.Center for Computational Surgery, Houston Methodist Research InstituteHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryHouston Methodist HospitalHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  5. 5.Malcom Randall VAMCGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations