Advertisement

Recording Tracks: Methods and Techniques

  • Matthew R. BennettEmail author
  • Marcin Budka
Chapter
  • 338 Downloads

Abstract

Before one can study a set of tracks whether they are fossil remains from the past or were imprinted by a serial killer just yesterday one first has to find them and then record or document them to enable description and analysis. This chapter focuses on prospection and the recording of tracks and again shows the benefits that can be achieved by the cross fertilisation between the two disciplines at the heart of this book.

Keywords

White Sands National Monument Outsole Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) Polynomial Texture Mapping (PTM) Footwear Evidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adair T (2009) Capturing Snow Impressions. Law Order 57:14–16Google Scholar
  2. Adair TW, Dobersen M (2006) Lifting dusty shoe impressions from human skin: a review of experimental research from Colorado. J Forensic Ident 56:333Google Scholar
  3. Adair TW, Shaw RL (2007) The dry-casting method: a reintroduction to a simple method for casting snow impressions. J Forensic Ident 57:823Google Scholar
  4. Adair TW, Tewes R, Bellinger TR, Nicholls T (2007) Characteristics of snow and their influence on casting methods for impression evidence. J Forensic Ident 57:807Google Scholar
  5. Ahmad UK, Abdul Jabat NH, Yew CH, Yusoft NA (2010) Development of reagent kit for the enhancement of shoeprints at crime scene. Malays J Forensic Sci 1:28–33Google Scholar
  6. Altamura F, Melis RT, Mussi M (2017) A middle Pleistocene hippo tracksite at Gombore II-2 (Melka Kunture, Upper Awash, Ethiopia). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 470:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Altamura F, Bennett MR, D’Août K, Gaudzinski-Windheuser S, Melis RT, Reynolds SC, Mussi M (2018) Archaeology and ichnology at Gombore II-2, Melka Kunture, Ethiopia: everyday life of a mixed-age hominin group 700,000 years ago. Sci Rep 8:2815.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21158-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andalo FA, Calakli F, Taubin G, Goldenstein G (2011) Accurate 3D footwear impression recovery from photographs Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention, 4th International Conference, ICDPGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashton N, Lewis SG, De Groote I, Duffy SM, Bates M, Bates R, Hoare P, Lewis M, Parfitt SA, Peglar S, Williams C (2014) Hominin footprints from early Pleistocene deposits at Happisburgh, UK. PloS ONE 9(2):e88329.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbero BR, Ureta ES (2011) Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy. Comput Aided Des 43:188–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates KT, Manning PL, Vila B, Hodgetts D (2008a) Three-dimensional modelling and analysis of dinosaur trackways. Palaeontology 51:999–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bates KT, Rarity F, Manning PL, Hodgetts D, Vila B, Oms O, Galobart À, Gawthorpe RL (2008b) High-resolution LiDAR and photogrammetric survey of the Fumanya dinosaur tracksites (Catalonia): implications for the conservation and interpretation of geological heritage sites. J Geol Soc London 165:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Battiest T, Clutter SW, McGill D (2016) A comparison of various fixatives for casting footwear impressions in sand at crime scenes. J Forensic Sci 61:782–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bennett MR, Morse SA (2014) Human footprints: fossilised locomotion?. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Bennett MR, Huddart D, Gonzalez S (2009) Preservation and analysis of three-dimensional footwear evidence in soils: the application of optical laser scanning. In: Criminal and environmental soil forensics (pp. 445–461). Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennett MR, Falkingham P, Morse SA, Bates K, Crompton RH (2013) Preserving the impossible: conservation of soft-sediment hominin footprint sites and strategies for three-dimensional digital data capture. PLoS ONE 8(4):e60755.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bodziak WJ, Hammer L (2006) An evaluation of dental stone, traxstone, and crime-cast. J Forensic Ident 56:769–787Google Scholar
  18. Bodziak WJ (2017) Forensic footwear evidence (Practical aspects of criminal and forensic investigations). CRC Press, Taylor and Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
  19. Breithaupt BH, Matthews NA, Noble TA (2004) An integrated approach to three-dimensional data collection at dinosaur tracksites in the Rocky Mountain West. Ichnos 11:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buck U, Albertini N, Naether S, Thali MJ (2007) 3D documentation of footwear impressions and tyre tracks in snow with high resolution optical surface scanning. Forensic Sci Int 171:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Budka M, Bennett MR, Larsen H, Roach J (2018) A system for footwear capture in the laboratory or custody environment. Sci Justice, in pressGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen A, Wiesner S, Grafit A, Shor Y (2011) A new method for casting three- dimensional shoeprints and tire marks with dental stone. J Forensic Sci 56:S210–S213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Croft S, Nic Daeid N, Savage KA, Vallance R, Ramage R (2010) The Enhancement and Recovery of Footwear Marks Contaminated in Soil: A Feasibility Study. J Forensic Ident 6:718–737Google Scholar
  24. Day MH, Wickens EH (1980) Laetoli pliocene hominid footprints and bipedalism. Nature 286:385–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Gilbert JM, Sáez A (2009) Paleohydrological significance of trace fossil distribution in Oligocene fluvial-fan-to-lacustrine systems of the Ebro Basin, Spain. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 272:162–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Du Pasquier E, Hebrard J, Ineichen Margot P (1996) Evaluation and comparison of casting materials in forensic sciences applications to tool marks and foot/shoe impressions. Forensic Sci Int 82:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Errickson D (2017) Shedding light on skeletal remains: the use of structured light scanning for 3D archiving, in human remains: another dimension. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804602-9.00008-4
  28. Falkingham PL (2012) Acquisition of high resolution three-dimensional models using free, open-source, photogrammetric software. Palaeontol Electronica 15 1T:15pGoogle Scholar
  29. Farrugia K, Nic Daéid N, Savage KA, Bandey H (2010) Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood deposited on fabric—evaluating the use of alginate casting materials followed by chemical enhancement. Sci Justice 50:200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Farrugia KJ, Savage KA, Bandey H, Nic Daéid N (2011a) Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood on fabric—Part 1: Protein stains. Sci Justice 51:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farrugia KJ, Savage KA, Bandey H, Ciuksza T, Nic Daéid N (2011b) Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood on fabric—Part 2: peroxidase reagents. Sci Justice 51:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farrugia KJ, Bandey H, Bleay S, Nic Daéid N (2012a) Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in urine on fabric. Forensic Sci Int 214:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Farrugia K, Bandey H, Dawson L, Nic Daeid N (2012b) Chemical enhancement of soil based footwear impressions on fabric. Forensic Sci Int 219:12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Farrugia KJ, Riches P, Bandey H, Savage K, Nic Daéid N (2012c) Controlling the variable of pressure in the production of test footwear impressions. Sci Justice 52:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Farrugia KJ, Bandey H, Dawson L, Daéid NN (2013a) A comparison of enhancement techniques for footwear impressions on dark and patterned fabrics. J Forensic Sci 58:1472–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farrugia KJ, Savage KA, Bandey H, Nic Daéid N (2013b) Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood on fabric—Part 3: amino acid staining. Sci Justice 53:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gamage RE, Joshi A, Zheng JY, Tuceryan M (2013a) High resolution 3D tire and footprint impression acquisition for forensics applications. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp 317–322Google Scholar
  38. Gamage RE, Joshi A, Zheng JY, Tuceryan M (2013b) A 3D impression acquisition system for forensic applications. In: Advances in depth image analysis and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  39. Gervais R (2006) Footwear impressions on ice. Identification Canada December Issue: 144–145Google Scholar
  40. Gierliński GD, Niedźwiedzki G, Lockley MG, Athanassiou A, Fassoulas C, Dubicka Z, Boczarowski A, Bennett MR, Ahlberg PE (2017) Possible hominin footprints from the late Miocene (c. 5.7 Ma) of Crete? Proc Geol Assoc 128:697–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goldberg PS (1974) Sediment peels from prehistoric sites. J Field Archaeol 1:323–328Google Scholar
  42. Hammer L, Wolfe J (2003) Shoe and tire impressions in snow: photography and casting. J Forensic Ident 53(6):647Google Scholar
  43. Haniel JS, Yoshida JH (2012) Evaluation and application of polynomial texture mapping (PTM) in the area of shoe/tire impression evidence. US Department of Justice—NIJ, Award No. 2004-IJ-CX-K008 (www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/240591.pdf)
  44. Hatala KG, Roach NT, Ostrofsky KR, Wunderlich RE, Dingwall HL, Villmoare BA, Green DJ, Braun DR, Harris JW, Behrensmeyer AK, Richmond BG (2017) Hominin track assemblages from Okote member deposits near Ileret, Kenya, and their implications for understanding fossil hominin paleobiology at 1.5 Ma. J Hum Evol 112:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Heezen BC, Johnson GL (1962) A peel technique for unconsolidated sediments. J Sediment Res 32Google Scholar
  46. Henderson J, Armitage R (2018) If the shoe fits: proposing a randomised control trial on the effect of a digitised in-custody footwear technology compared to a paper-based footwear method. Crime Secur Soc 1(1)Google Scholar
  47. Hueske E (1991) Photographing and casting footwear/tiretrack impressions in snow. J Forensic Ident 41:92–95Google Scholar
  48. Masao FT, Ichumbaki EB, Cherin M, Barili A, Boschian G, Iurino, DA, Menconero S, Moggi-Cecchi J, Manzi G (2016) New footprints from Laetoli (Tanzania) provide evidence for marked body size variation in early hominins. eLife 5.  https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.19568
  49. Krapovickas V, Ciccioli PL, Mángano MG, Marsicano CA, Limarino CO (2009) Paleobiology and paleoecology of an arid–semiarid Miocene South American ichnofauna in anastomosed fluvial deposits. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 284:129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laporte LF, Behrensmeyer AK (1980) Tracks and substrate reworking by terrestrial vertebrates in Quaternary sediments of Kenya. J Sediment Res 50:1337–1346Google Scholar
  51. Lea PD (1996) Vertebrate tracks in Pleistocene eolian sand-sheet deposits of Alaska. Quatern Res 45:226–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leakey MD, Harris JM (1987) Laetoli: a Pliocene site in Northern Tanzania. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. LeMay J (2010) The documentation of a large outdoor crime scene with a large number of footwear impressions: their analysis and comparison. J Forensic Ident 60:738–747Google Scholar
  54. LeMay J, Adams S, Stephen A (2011) Validation of vinyl static cling film for the collection and preservation of dust impressions. J Forensic Ident 6:317–332Google Scholar
  55. McNeil K, Knaap W (2012) Bromophenol blue as a chemical enhancement technique for latent shoeprints. J Forensic Ident 62:143–153Google Scholar
  56. McPherron SP, Gernat T, Hublin JJ (2009) Structured light scanning for high-resolution documentation of in situ archaeological finds. J Archaeol Sci 36:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Melchor RN, Bedatou E, de Valais S, Genise JF (2006) Lithofacies distribution of invertebrate and vertebrate trace-fossil assemblages in an early Mesozoic ephemeral fluvio-lacustrine system from Argentina: implications for the Scoyenia ichnofacies. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 239:253–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller MT, Massey P (2015) The crime scene: a visual guide. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Milne R (2012) The development of a wireless electrostatic mark lifting method and its use at crime scenes. J Forensic Ident 62:154–164Google Scholar
  60. Nause LA (1992) Casting footwear impressions in snow: snowprint-wax vs. prill sulphur. RCMP Gazette 54:1–7Google Scholar
  61. Needham JA, Sharp JS (2016) Watch your step! A frustrated total internal reflection approach to forensic footwear imaging. Sci Rep 6:21290.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. NPIA (2007) Footwear marks recovery manual. NPIAGoogle Scholar
  63. Ojena SM (1984) A new improved technique for casting impressions in snow. J Forensic Sci 29:322–325Google Scholar
  64. Ostler RD (1963) Shoe Impressions in snow. Police J 36:532–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Petti FM, Avanzini M, Belvedere M, De Gasperi M, Ferretti P, Girardi S, Remondino F, Tomasoni R (2008) Digital 3D modelling of dinosaur footprints by photogrammetry and laser scanning techniques: integrated approach at the Coste dell’Anglone tracksite (Lower Jurassic, Southern Alps, Northern Italy). Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, Acta Geologica 83:303–315Google Scholar
  66. Richards A, Leintz R (2013) Forensic reflected ultraviolet imaging. J Forensic Ident 63:46–69Google Scholar
  67. Rogahn K (2013) Evaluating high dynamic range (HDR) processing with regard to the presence of individualizing characteristics in shoeprint impressions. CAC News 2nd Quarter 2013, pp. 8–13. www.cacnews.org/news/2ndq13.pdf
  68. Sanfilippo P, Richards A, Nichols H (2010) Reflected ultraviolet digital photography: the part someone forgot to mention. J Forensic Ident 60:181–198Google Scholar
  69. Shor Y, Tsach T, Vinokurov A, Glattstein B, Landau E, Levin N (2003) Lifting shoeprints using gelatin lifters and a hydraulic press. J Forensic Sci 48:368–372Google Scholar
  70. Shor Y, Cohen A, Wiesner S, Weiss R (2014) Recovering dusty shoe prints from skin: comparative research. Open Forensic Sci J 7:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Skipper JA, Ward DJ, Johnson R (1998) A rapid, lightweight sediment peel technique using polyurethane foam. J Sediment Res 68(3)Google Scholar
  72. Snyder C (2015) The ability of footwear to produce impressions of good detail in sandy soil substrates. J Forensic Ident 65:273Google Scholar
  73. Snyder C (2016) A comparison of photography and casting methods of footwear impressions in different sandy soil substrates. J Forensic Ident 66:37Google Scholar
  74. Stidham TA, Mason J (2009) A quick method for collecting modern small-scale ichnological and sedimentological structures. J Paleontol Tech 4:1–4Google Scholar
  75. Thompson TJU, Norris P (2018) A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning. Sci JusticeGoogle Scholar
  76. Tóth T, Živčák J (2014) A comparison of the outputs of 3D scanners. Procedia Eng 69:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wiesner S, Tsach T, Belser C, Shor YA (2011) Comparative research of two lifting methods: electrostatic lifter and gelatin lifter. J Forensic Sci 56(S1):S58–S62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wiesner S, Izraeli E, Shor Y, Domb A (2013) Lifting bloody footwear impressions using alginate casts followed by chemical enhancement. J For Sci 58:782–788Google Scholar
  79. Wolfe JR (2008) Sulfur cement: a new material for casting snow impression evidence. J Forensic Ident 58:485Google Scholar
  80. Yasso WE, Hartman EM (1972) Rapid field technique using spray adhesive to obtain peels of unconsolidated sediment. Sedimentology 19:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute for Studies of Landscape and Human EvolutionBournemouth UniversityPooleUK
  2. 2.Department of Computing and Informatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute for Studies of Landscape and Human EvolutionBournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations