Advertisement

ICT-Supported Interventions Targeting Pre-frailty: Healthcare Recommendations from the Personalised ICT Supported Service for Independent Living and Active Ageing (PERSSILAA) Study

  • Rónán O’CaoimhEmail author
  • D. William Molloy
  • Carol Fitzgerald
  • Lex Van Velsen
  • Miriam Cabrita
  • Mohammad Hossein Nassabi
  • Frederiek de Vette
  • Marit Dekker van Weering
  • Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink
  • Wander Kenter
  • Sanne Frazer
  • Amélia P. Rauter
  • Antónia Turkman
  • Marília Antunes
  • Feridun Turkman
  • Marta S. Silva
  • Alice Martins
  • Helena S. Costa
  • Tânia Gonçalves Albuquerque
  • António Ferreira
  • Mario Scherillo
  • Vincenzo De Luca
  • Pasquale Abete
  • Annamaria Colao
  • Alejandro García-Rudolph
  • Rocío Sanchez-Carrion
  • Javier Solana Sánchez
  • Enrique J. Gomez Aguilera
  • Maddalena Illario
  • Hermie Hermens
  • Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 869)

Abstract

As society ages, healthcare systems are preparing for an increasing prevalence of frail, co-morbid and older community-dwellers at risk of adverse outcomes including falls, malnutrition, hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death. Early intervention is desirable and pre-frailty, before onset of functional decline, may represent a suitable transition stage to target, albeit evidence for reversibility and appropriate interventions are limited. No consensus on the definition, diagnosis or management of pre-frailty exists. This work describes 25 healthcare related findings from the recently completed PERsonalised ICT Supported Service for Independent Living and Active Ageing (PERSSILAA) project, funded under the 2013–2016 European Union Framework Programme 7 (grant #610359). PERSSILAA developed a comprehensive Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)-supported platform to screen, assess, intervene and then monitor community-dwellers in two regions (Enschede in the Netherlands and Campania in Italy) in order to address pre-frailty and promote active and healthy ageing, targeting three important pre-frailty subdomains: nutrition, cognition and physical function. Proposed definitions of pre-frailty, ICT-based approaches to screen and monitor for the onset of frailty and targeted management strategies employing technology across these domains are described. The potential of these 25 healthcare recommendations in the development of future European guidelines on the screening and prevention of frailty is explored.

Keywords

Pre-frailty Frailty Information and communication technology Healthcare recommendations Guidelines 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the PERSSILAA participants throughout the three years of the project. Specifically, the authors thank - all older adults who joined the project: for Italy this includes residents from the Confalone, Pilar, Rogazionisti and Santa Maria della Salute communities; for the Netherlands this includes those in the municipalities of Enschede, Hengelo, Tubbergen and Twenterand. The researchers would also like to acknowledge the not for profit organizations in Italy who collaborated (Progetto Alfa, Salute in Collina), the healthcare professionals from Campania (Local Health Agency Naples 1, CRIUV) and the health systems including General Practitioners who supported the project in the Netherlands.

References

  1. 1.
    Rechel, B., Grundy, E., Robine, J.M., Cylus, J., Mackenbach, J.P., Knai, C., et al.: Ageing in the European Union. Lancet 381(9874), 1312–1322 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collard, R.M., Boter, H., Schoevers, R.A., Oude Voshaar, R.C.: Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 60(8), 1487–1492 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sternberg, S.A., Schwartz, A.W., Karunananthan, S., Bergman, H., Clarfield, A.M.: The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 59, 2129–2138 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borges, L.L., Menezes, R.L.: Definitions and markers of frailty: a systematic review of literature. Rev. Clin. Gerontol. 21(1), 67–77 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodríguez-Mañas, L., Féart, C., Mann, G., Viña, J., Chatterji, S., Chodzko-Zajko, W., Harmand, M.G., Bergman, H., Carcaillon, L., Nicholson, C., Scuteri, A.: Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement. The frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 68(1), 62–67 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morley, J.E., Vellas, B., van Kan, G.A., et al.: Frailty consensus: a call to action. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 14, 392–397 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fried, L.P., Tangen, C.M., Walston, J., et al.: Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56, 146–156 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olaroiu, M., Ghinescu, M., Naumov, V., Brinza, I., Heuvel, W.: The psychometric qualities of the Groningen frailty indicator in Romanian community-dwelling old citizens. Fam. Pract. 31(4), 490–495 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    At, J., Bryce, R., Prina, M., Acosta, D., Ferri, C.P., Guerra, M., Huang, Y., Rodriguez, J.J., Salas, A., Sosa, A.L., Williams, J.D., Dewey, M.E., Acosta, I., Liu, Z., Beard, J., Prince, M.: Frailty and the prediction of dependence and mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a 10/66 population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 13, 138 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rockwood, K., Song, X., MacKnight, C., et al.: A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 173(5), 489–495 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cesari, M., Gambassi, G., Abellan van Kan, G., Vellas, B.: The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes. Age Ageing 43(1), 10–12 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blodgett, J., Theou, O., Kirkland, S., Andreou, P., Rockwood, K.: Frailty in NHANES: comparing the frailty index and phenotype. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 60(3), 464–470 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harttgen, K., Kowal, P., Strulik, H., Chatterji, S., Vollmer, S.: Patterns of frailty in older adults: comparing results from higher and lower income countries using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE). PLoS ONE 8, e75847 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Syddall, H., Roberts, H.C., Evandrou, M., Cooper, C., Bergman, H., Sayer, A.A.: Prevalence and correlates of frailty among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Age Ageing 39(2), 197–203 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santos-Eggimann, B., Cuenoud, P., Spagnoli, J., Junod, J.: Prevalence of frailty in middle-aged and older community-dwelling Europeans living in 10 countries. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 64, 675–681 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roe, L., O’Halloran, A., Normand, C., Murphy, C.: The impact of frailty on public Health Nurse Service Utilisation: Findings from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gill, T.M., Gahbauer, E.A., Allore, H.G., Han, L.: Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons. Arch. Intern. Med. 166(4), 418–423 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lang, P.O., Michel, J.P., Zekry, D.: Frailty syndrome: a transitional state in a dynamic process. Gerontology 55(5), 539–549 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gray, S.L., Anderson, M.L., Hubbard, R.A., LaCroix, A., Crane, P.K., McCormick, W., Bowen, J.D., McCurry, S.M., Larson, E.B.: Frailty and incident dementia. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 68(9), 1083–1090 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sergi, G., Veronese, N., Fontana, L., De Rui, M., Bolzetta, F., Zambon, S., Corti, M.C., Baggio, G., Toffanello, E.D., Crepaldi, G., Perissinotto, E.: Pre-frailty and risk of cardiovascular disease in elderly men and women: the Pro. VA study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 65(10), 976–983 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Caoimh, R., Healy, E., O’Connell, E., Gao, Y., Molloy, D.W.: The community assessment of risk tool, (CART): investigation of inter-rater reliability for a new instrument measuring risk of adverse outcomes in community dwelling older adults. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 181(S7), 227 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Caoimh, R., Gao, Y., Svendrovski, A., Healy, E., O’Connell, E., O’Keeffe, G., Cronin, U., O’Herlihy, E., Cornally, N., Molloy, D.W.: Screening for markers of frailty and perceived risk of adverse outcomes using the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC). BMC Geriatr. 14, 104 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Caoimh, R., Gao, Y., Svendrovski, A., Healy, E., O’Connell, E., O’Keeffe, G., Leahy-Warren, P., Cronin, U., O’Herlihy, E., Cornally, N., Molloy, D.W.: The risk instrument for screening in the community (RISC): a new instrument for predicting risk of adverse outcomes in community dwelling older adults. BMC Geriatr. 15, 92 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0095-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kahlon, S., Pederson, J., Majumdar, S.R., Belga, S., Lau, D., Fradette, M., Boyko, D., Bakal, J.A., Johnston, C., Padwal, R.S., McAlister, F.A.: Association between frailty and 30-day outcomes after discharge from hospital. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 187(11), 799–804 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robinson, T.N., Wu, D.S., Stiegmann, G.V., Moss, M.: Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults. Am. J. Surg. 202(5), 511–514 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Song, X., Mitnitski, A., Rockwood, K.: Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 58(4), 681–687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bousquet, J., Michel, J.P., Strandberg, T., Crooks, D., Iakovidis, I., Iglesia, M.: The European innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing: the European geriatric medicine introduces the EIP on AHA column. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 5, 361–362 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fairhall, N., Kurrle, S.E., Sherrington, C., Lord, S.R., Lockwood, K., John, B., Monaghan, N., Howard, K., Cameron, I.D.: Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention on preventing development of frailty in pre-frail older people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 5(2), e007091 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    O’Caoimh, R., Sweeney, C., Hynes, H., et al.: COLLaboration on AGEing – COLLAGE: Ireland’s three star reference site for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA). Eur. Geriatr. Med. 6, 505–511 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Michel, J.P., Dreux, C., Vacheron, A.: Healthy ageing: evidence that improvement is possible at every age. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 7(4), 298–305 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Frost, R., Belk, C., Jovicic, A., Ricciardi, F., Kharicha, K., Gardner, B., et al.: Health promotion interventions for community-dwelling older people with mild or pre-frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 17, 157 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fiatarone Singh, M.A., Gates, N., Saigal, N., et al.: The Study of Mental and Resistance Training (SMART) study-resistance training and/or cognitive training in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized, double-blind, double-sham controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 15(12), 873–880 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ngandu, T., Lehtisalo, J., Solomon, A., Levälahti, E., Ahtiluoto, S., Antikainen, R., Bäckman, L., Hänninen, T., Jula, A., Laatikainen, T., Lindström, J.: A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385(9984), 2255–2263 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    O’Caoimh, R., Sato, S., Wall, J., Igras, E., Foley, M.J., Timmons, S., Molloy, D.W.: Potential for a “memory gym” intervention to delay conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 16(11), 998–999 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bherer, L., Erickson, K.I., Liu-Ambrose, T.: A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. J. Aging Res. J. Aging. Res. 2013 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/657508. Article ID: 657508 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pahor, M., Guralnik, J.M., Ambrosius, W.T., Blair, S., Bonds, D.E., Church, T.S., Espeland, M.A., Fielding, R.A., Gill, T.M., Groessl, E.J., King, A.C.: Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adults: the LIFE study randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311(23), 2387–2396 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beswick, A.D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., Ebrahim, S.: Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 371, 725–735 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Serra-Prat, M., Sist, X., Domenich, R., Jurado, L., Saiz, A., Roces, A., et al.: Effectiveness of an intervention to prevent frailty in pre-frail community-dwelling older people consulting in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 46, 1–7 (2017)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Keränen, N.S., Kangas, M., Immonen, M., Similä, H., Enwald, H., Korpelainen, R., Jämsä, T.: Use of information and communication technologies among older people with and without frailty: a population-based survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 19(2), e29 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Broekhuizen, K., de Gelder, J., Wijsman, C.A., Wijsman, L.W., Westendorp, R.G., Verhagen, E., Slagboom, P.E., de Craen, A.J., van Mechelen, W., van Heemst, D., van der Ouderaa, F.: An internet-based physical activity intervention to improve quality of life of inactive older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 18(4), e74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee, P.H., Lee, Y.S., Chan, D.C.: Interventions targeting geriatric frailty: a systemic review. J. Clin. Gerontol. Geriatr. 3(2), 47–52 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Turner, G., Clegg, A.: British Geriatrics Society; Age UK; Royal College of General Practioners. Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report. Age Ageing 43(6), 744–747 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Velsen, L., Illario, M., Jansen-Kosterink, S., Crola, C., Di Somma, C., Colao, A., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M.: A community-based, technology-supported health service for detecting and preventing frailty among older adults: a participatory design development process. J. Aging Res. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/216084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    de Vette, F., Tabak, M., Dekker-van Weering, M., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M.: Engaging elderly people in telemedicine through gamification. JMIR Serious Games 3(2), e9 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lumsden, J., Edwards, E.A., Lawrence, N.S., Coyle, D., Munafò, M.R.: Gamification of cognitive assessment and cognitive training: a systematic review of applications and efficacy. JMIR Serious Games 4, 2 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Patel, M.S., Benjamin, E.J., Volpp, K.G., Fox, C.S., Small, D.S., Massaro, J.M., Lee, J.J., Hilbert, V., Valentino, M., Taylor, D.H., Manders, E.S., Mutalik, K., Zhu, J., Wang, W., Murabito, J.M.: Effect of a game-based intervention designed to enhance social incentives to increase physical activity among families. The BE FIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Boehler, C.E., de Graaf, G., Steuten, L., Yang, Y., Abadie, F.: Development of a web-based tool for the assessment of health and economic outcomes of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA). BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 15(S3), 4 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Illario, M., Iaccarino, G., Piazza, O., Menditto, E., Coscioni, E.: Proceedings of the EIP on AHA: A3 action group on frailty. Transl. Med. UniSa 13, 1–3 (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Vries, N.M., Staal, J.B., van Ravensberg, C.D., Hobbelen, J.S.M., Olde Rikkerte, M.G.M., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G.: Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res. Rev. 10, 104–114 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    van Kempen, J.A., Schers, H.J., Philp, I., Rikkert, M.G.O., Melis, R.J.: Predictive validity of a two-step tool to map frailty in primary care. BMC Med. 13(1), 1 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Steverink, N., Slaets, J.P.J., Schuurmans, H., Van Lis, M.: Measuring frailty: developing and testing the GFI (Groningen Frailty Indicator). Gerontologist 41(S1), 236 (2001)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    O’Caoimh, R., Gao, Y., McGlade, C., Healy, L., Gallagher, P., Timmons, S., Molloy, D.W.: Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment. Age Ageing 41(5), 624–629 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    O’Caoimh, R., Gao, Y., Gallagher, P., Eustace, J., McGlade, C., Molloy, D.W.: Which part of the quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Qmci) discriminates between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment and dementia? Age Ageing 42, 324–330 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    O’Caoimh, R., Svendrovski, A., Johnston, B., Gao, Y., McGlade, C., Timmons, S., Eustace, J., Guyatt, G., Molloy, D.W.: The quick mild cognitive impairment screen correlated with the standardised Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive section in clinical trials. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67, 87–92 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bunt, S., O’Caoimh, R., Krijnen, W.P., Molloy, D.W., Goodijk, G.P., van der Schans, C.P., Hobbelen, J.S.M.: Validation of the dutch version of the quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Qmci-D). BMC Geriatr. 15, 115 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0113-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    O’Caoimh, R., Timmons, S., Molloy, D.W.: Screening for mild cognitive impairment: comparison of “MCI Specific” screening instruments. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 51(2), 619–629 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yavuz, B.B., Hacer, D.V., O’Caoimh, R., Kizilarslanoglu, M.C., Kilic, M.K., Molloy, D.W., Dogrul, R.T., Karabulut, E., Sağır, A., Yesil, Y., Kuyumcu, M.E., Halil, M., Cankurtaran, M.: Validation of the Turkish version of the quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Qmci-TR). Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Other Dement. 32(3), 145–156 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Li, X., Chen, Z., Gao, Y., Molloy, D.W., O’Caoimh, R.: Development of the Chinese version of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci-CN). Age Ageing 46(S3), 57 (2017)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    O’Caoimh, R., Molloy, D.William: The quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Qmci). In: Larner, A.J. (ed.) Cognitive Screening Instruments, pp. 255–272. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44775-9_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    O’Caoimh, R., Gao, Y., Gallagher, P., Eustace, J., Molloy, W.: Comparing approaches to optimize cut-off scores for short cognitive screening instruments in mild cognitive impairment and dementia. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 57(1), 123–133 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    O’Caoimh, R., Molloy, D.W., Fitzgerald, C., Van Velsen, L., Cabrita, M., Nassabi, M.H., de Vette, F., Dekker-van Weering, M., Jansen-Kosterink, S., Kenter, W., Frazer, S., et al.: Healthcare recommendations from the personalised ICT supported service for independent living and active ageing (PERSSILAA) study. In: ICT4Ageing Well 2017, Porto, Portugal, 28–29 April 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Goisser, S., Guyonnet, S., Volkert, D.: The role of nutrition in frailty: an overview. J. Frailty Aging 5(2), 74–77 (2016)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    MacLeod, S., Musich, S., Gulyas, S., Cheng, Y., Tkatch, R., Cempellin, D., et al.: The impact of inadequate health literacy on patient satisfaction, healthcare utilization, and expenditures among older adults. Geriatr. Nurs. 38(4), 334–341 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shakersain, B., Santoni, G., Faxén-Irving, G., Rizzuto, D., Fratiglioni, L., Xu, W.: Nutritional status and survival among old adults: an 11-year population-based longitudinal study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 70, 320–325 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Schilp, J., Kruizenga, H.M., Wijnhoven, H.A., Leistra, E., Evers, A.M., van Binsbergen, J.J., Deeg, D.J., Visser, M.: High prevalence of undernutrition in Dutch community-dwelling older individuals. Nutrition 28(11), 1151–1156 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    O’Shea, E., Trawley, S., Manning, E., Barrett, A., Browne, V., Timmons, S.: Malnutrition in hospitalised older adults: a multicentre observational study of prevalence, associations and outcomes. J. Nutr. Health Aging 21(7), 830–836 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-016-0831-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pauly, L., Stehle, P., Volkert, D.: Nutritional situation of elderly nursing home residents. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 40(1), 3–12 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    van Staveren, W.A., de Groot, L.C.P.: Evidence-based dietary guidance and the role of dairy products for appropriate nutrition in the elderly. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 30(S5), 429–437 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Plassman, B.L., Langa, K.M., Fisher, G.G., Heeringa, S.G., Weir, D.R., Ofstedal, M.B., Burke, J.R., Hurd, M.D., Potter, G.G., Rodgers, W.L., Steffens, D.C.: Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 148(6), 427–434 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Prince, M., Bryce, R., Albanese, E., Wimo, A., Ribeiro, W., Ferri, C.P.: The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dementia 9(1), 63–75 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Satizabal, C.L., Beiser, A.S., Chouraki, V., Chêne, G., Dufouil, C., Seshadri, S.: Incidence of dementia over three decades in the Framingham Heart Study. N. Engl. J. Med. 374(6), 523–532 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Matthews, F.E., Arthur, A., Barnes, L.E., et al. (Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Collaboration): A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet, 382(9902), 1405–1412 (2013)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Langa, K.M., Larson, E.B., Crimmins, E.M., et al.: A comparison of the prevalence of dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012. JAMA Intern. Med. 177(1), 51–58 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Norton, S., Matthews, F.E., Barnes, D.E., Yaffe, K., Brayne, C.: Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 13(8), 788–794 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Choi, J., Twamley, E.W.: Cognitive rehabilitation therapies for Alzheimer’s disease: a review of methods to improve treatment engagement and self-efficacy. Neuropsychol. Rev. 23(1), 48–62 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Galvin, J.E., Roe, C.M., Powlishta, K.K., Coats, M.A., Muich, S.J., Grant, E., Miller, J.P., Storandt, M., Morris, J.C.: The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology 65(4), 559–564 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Larner, A.J.: AD8 informant questionnaire for cognitive impairment pragmatic diagnostic test accuracy study. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 28(3), 198–202 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L.: Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Liu, L.K., Lee, W.J., Chen, L.Y., Hwang, A.C., Lin, M.H., Peng, L.N., Chen, L.K.: Association between frailty, osteoporosis, falls and hip fractures among community-dwelling people aged 50 years and older in Taiwan: results from I-Lan longitudinal aging study. PLoS ONE 10(9), e0136968 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Liu, C.K., Fielding, R.A.: Exercise as an intervention for frailty. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 27(1), 101–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Giné-Garriga, M., Roqué-Fíguls, M., Coll-Planas, L., Sitjà-Rabert, M., Salvà, A.: Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 95(4), 753–769 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Robertson, M.C., Devlin, N., Scuffham, P., Gardner, M.M., Buchner, D.M., Campbell, A.J.: Economic evaluation of a community based exercise programme to prevent falls. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 55, 600–606 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Thomas, S., Mackintosh, S., Halbert, J.: Does the ‘Otago exercise programme’ reduce mortality and falls in older adults?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 39(6), 681–687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Tabak, M., Brusse-Keizer, M., van der Valk, P., Hermens, H., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M.: A telehealth program for self-management of COPD exacerbations and promotion of an active lifestyle: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 9, 935 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Vollenbroek-Hutten, M., Pais, S., Ponce, S., Dekker-van Weering, M., Jansen-Kosterink, S., Schena, F., Tabarini, N., Carotenuto, F., Iadicicco, V., Illario, M.: Rest rust! physical active for active and healthy ageing. Transl. Med.@ UniSa 13, 19 (2015)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Chesser, A.K., Keene Woods, N., Smothers, K., Rogers, N.: Health literacy and older adults: a systematic review. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721416630492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Manafo, E., Wong, S.: Health literacy programs for older adults: a systematic literature review. Health Educ. Res. 27(6), 947–960 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Norman, C., Skinner, H.: eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J. Med. Internet Res. 8, e9 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Strawbridge, W.J., Shema, S.J., Balfour, J.L., Higby, H.R., Kaplan, G.A.: Antecedents of frailty over three decades in an older cohort. J. Gerontol. 53b(1), S9–S16 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Keller, H.H.: Nutrition and health-related quality of life in frail older adults. J. Nutr. Health Aging 8(4), 245–252 (2004)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Lenardt, M.H., Carneiro, N.H.K., Albino, J., Willig, M.H.: Quality of life of frail elderly users of the primary care. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem 27(5), 399–404 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Gill, D.L., Hammond, C.C., Reifsteck, E.J., Jehu, C.M., Williams, R.A., Adams, M.M., et al.: Physical activity and quality of life. J. Prev. Med. Publ. Health 46(1), S28 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Drewnowski, A., Evans, W.J.: Nutrition, physical activity, and quality of life in older adults: summary. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56(2), 89–94 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Bitterman, N.: Design of medical devices—a home perspective. Eur. J. Internal Med. 22(1), 39–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., Madden, L.: Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc. 23(5), 561–582 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cesari, M., Prince, M., Thiyagarajan, J.A., De Carvalho, I.A., Bernabei, R., Chan, P., Gutierrez-Robledo, L.M., Michel, J.P., Morley, J.E., Ong, P., Manas, L.R.: Frailty: an emerging public health priority. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 17(3), 188–192 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sacha, J., Sacha, M., Soboń, J., Borysiuk, Z., Feusette, P.: Is it time to begin a public campaign concerning frailty and pre-frailty? A review article. Front. Physiol. 11(8), 484 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00484
  98. 98.
    Scanlon, L., O’Shea, E., O’Caoimh, R., Timmons, S.: Technology use, frequency and self-rated skills: a survey of community dwelling older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 63(7), 1483–1484 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gell, N.M., Rosenberg, D.E., Demiris, G., LaCroix, A.Z., Patel, K.V.: Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. Gerontologist 55(3), 412–421 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Scanlon, L., O’Shea, E., O’Caoimh, R., Timmons, S.: Assessment of cognition using cognitive training: comparison of a commercial “brain training” application with the montreal cognitive assessment. Gerontology 62(2), 247–252 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Franchini, M., Pieroni, S., Fortunato, L., Knezevic, T., Liebman, M., Molinaro, S.: Integrated information for integrated care in the general practice setting in Italy: using social network analysis to go beyond the diagnosis of frailty in the elderly. Clin. Transl. Med. 5(1), 24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Watkins, I., Xie, B.: eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(11), e225 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Cesari, M., Marzetti, E., Thiem, U., Pérez-Zepeda, M.U., Van Kan, G.A., Landi, F., Petrovic, M., Cherubini, A., Bernabei, R.: The geriatric management of frailty as paradigm of “the end of the disease era”. Eur. J. Internal Med. 31, 11–14 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rónán O’Caoimh
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • D. William Molloy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol Fitzgerald
    • 1
  • Lex Van Velsen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Miriam Cabrita
    • 4
    • 5
  • Mohammad Hossein Nassabi
    • 5
  • Frederiek de Vette
    • 5
  • Marit Dekker van Weering
    • 4
  • Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink
    • 4
  • Wander Kenter
    • 4
  • Sanne Frazer
    • 4
  • Amélia P. Rauter
    • 6
  • Antónia Turkman
    • 6
  • Marília Antunes
    • 6
  • Feridun Turkman
    • 6
  • Marta S. Silva
    • 6
  • Alice Martins
    • 6
  • Helena S. Costa
    • 7
    • 8
  • Tânia Gonçalves Albuquerque
    • 7
    • 8
  • António Ferreira
    • 6
  • Mario Scherillo
    • 9
  • Vincenzo De Luca
    • 10
  • Pasquale Abete
    • 10
  • Annamaria Colao
    • 10
  • Alejandro García-Rudolph
    • 11
  • Rocío Sanchez-Carrion
    • 11
  • Javier Solana Sánchez
    • 12
    • 13
  • Enrique J. Gomez Aguilera
    • 12
    • 13
  • Maddalena Illario
    • 10
    • 14
  • Hermie Hermens
    • 4
    • 5
  • Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, St. Finbarrs HospitalUniversity College CorkCork CityIreland
  2. 2.COLLaboration on AGEingUniversity College CorkCork CityIreland
  3. 3.Health Research Board, Clinical Research Facility GalwayNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  4. 4.Roessingh Research and DevelopmentEnschedeThe Netherlands
  5. 5.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Fundação da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  7. 7.Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IPLisboaPortugal
  8. 8.REQUIMTE/LAQVFaculdade de Farmácia da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  9. 9.Nexera SpaNapoliItaly
  10. 10.Federico II University HospitalNapoliItaly
  11. 11.Institut GuttmannInstitut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UABBadalona, BarcelonaSpain
  12. 12.Biomedical Engineering and Telemedicine Center, ETSI Telecomunicacion, Centre for Biomedical TechnologyUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  13. 13.Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN)ZaragozaSpain
  14. 14.Campania Health Directorate Division for Health InnovationNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations