Advertisement

Loganiaceae

Loganiaceae R. Br. ex Mart., Nov. Gen. Sp. Pl. 2: 133 (1827) (“Loganieae”), nom. cons.
Strychnaceae DC. ex Perleb, Vers. Arzneikr. Pfl.: 244 (1818) (“Strychneae”).
Spigeliaceae Bercht. & J. Presl, Přir. Rostlin 1: 40 (1823).
Gardneriaceae Wall. ex Perleb, Clav. Class.: 23 (1838) (“Gardnereae”).
Antoniaceae Hutch., Fam. Fl. Pl., ed. 2: 375 (1959).
Geniostomaceae Struwe & V. Albert, Cladistics 10: 206 (1995).
  • L. StruweEmail author
  • K. L. Gibbons
  • B. J. Conn
  • T. J. Motley
Chapter
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 15)

Abstract

The Loganiaceae is a pantropical angiosperm family in the order Gentianales consisting of 16 genera and approximately 460 species, distributed in all tropical areas of the world, as well as reaching some subtropical areas. The plants in this family are highly variable in their vegetative habit, from ephemeral annual herbs to large trees. This worldwide treatment includes detailed information on vegetative and reproductive morphology, flower and wood anatomy, embryology and cytology, infrafamilial classification and phylogenetic relationships, and ethnobotanical uses and conservation for all genera. Keys to the tribes and genera are provided, and the morphology and distribution of each genus is described. The accepted genera in the current circumscription are, listed by tribe: Antonieae: Antonia, Bonyunia, Norrisia, Usteria; Loganieae: Adelphacme, Geniostoma, Logania, Mitrasacme, Mitreola, Orianthera, Phyllangium, Schizacme; Spigelieae: Spigelia; Strychneae: Neuburgia, Gardneria, Strychnos.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Adebowale, A., Lamb, J., Nicholas, A., Naidoo, Y. 2016. Molecular systematics of southern African monkey orange Strychnos L. (Loganiaceae). Kew Bull. 71: 1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group] 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 141: 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backlund, M., Oxelman, B., Bremer, B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to Loganiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baillon, H.E. 1880. Sur la tribu des Labordiées. Bull. Mensuel, Soc. Linnéenne de Paris 1: 238–240.Google Scholar
  5. Bedi, Y.S., Bir, S.S., Gill, B.S. 1980. In: Löve, A. (ed.) IOPB Chromosome reports LXVII. Taxon 29: 353–355.Google Scholar
  6. Bendre, A.M. 1975. Patterns of nodal anatomy in Loganiaceae. Curr. Sci. 44(3): 99.Google Scholar
  7. Bisset, N.G. 1974. The Asian species of Strychnos. Part III. The Ethnobotany. Lloydia 37: 63–107.Google Scholar
  8. Bisset, N.G. 1980a. Loganiaceae. Phytochemistry. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. ed. 2, 28b(1). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 211–237.Google Scholar
  9. Bisset, N.G. 1980b. Loganiaceae. Useful plants. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 28b (1). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 238–244.Google Scholar
  10. Booker, S.G., Cooper, R.C. 1961. New Zealand Medicinal Plants. Auckland: Unity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Borgmann, E. 1964. Anteil der Polyploiden in der Flora des Bismarckgebirges von Ostneuguinea. Z. Bot. 52: 118–177.Google Scholar
  12. Bremer, B., Olmstead, R.G., Struwe, L, Sweere, J.A. 1994. rbcL sequences support exclusion of Retzia, Desfontainia, and Nicodemia from the Gentianales. Pl. Syst. Evol. 190: 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bremer, B., Bremer, K., Heidari, N., Erixon, P., Olmstead, R.G., Anderberg, A.A., Källersjö, M., Barkhordarian, E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 24: 274–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carr, G.D. 1978. Chromosome numbers of Hawaiian flowering plants and the significance of cytology in selected taxa. Amer. J. Bot. 65: 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castro, I., Robertson, A.W. 1997. Honeyeaters and the New Zealand forest flora: The utilization and profitability of small flowers. New Zeal. J. Ecol. 21: 169–179.Google Scholar
  16. Conn, B.J. 1980. A taxonomic revision of Geniostoma subg. Geniostoma (Loganiaceae). Blumea 26: 245–364.Google Scholar
  17. Conn, B.J. 1993. A new species of Geniostoma (Loganiaceae) from Lord Howe Island. Telopea 5: 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conn, B.J. 1995. Taxonomic revision of Logania section Logania (Loganiaceae). Austr. Syst. Bot. 8: 585–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conn, B.J., Brown, E.A, Dunlop, C.R. 1996. Loganiaceae. In: Wilson, A. Flora of Australia, vol. 28: Gentianales. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 1–72.Google Scholar
  20. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. 2 vols. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dahlgren, K.V.O. 1922. Die Embryologie der Loganiaceengattung Spigelia. Sv. Bot. Tidskr. 16: 77–87.Google Scholar
  22. de Lange, P.J., Rolfe, J.R., Champion, P.D., Courtney, S.P., Heenan, P.B., Barkla, J.W., Cameron, E.K., Norton, D.A., Hitchmough, R.A. 2013. Conservation status of New Zealand indigenous vascular plants, 2012. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 3. Wellington: Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  23. Endress, P.K., Jenny, M., Fallen, M.E. 1983. Convergent elaboration of apocarpous gynoecia in higher advanced dicotyledons (Sapindales, Malvales, Gentianales). Nord. J. Bot. 3: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Endress, M.E., Sennblad, B., Nilsson, S., Civeyrel, L., Chase, M.W., Huysmans, S., Grafström, E. Bremer, B. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of Apocynaceae s. str. and some related taxa in Gentianales: a multidisciplinary approach. In: Robbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E. (eds.) Second Int. Rubiaceae Conference Proceedings, Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 59–102.Google Scholar
  25. Endress, M.E., Igersheim, A., Garnock-Jones, P. 1998. Sexual dimorphism and secondary pollen presentation in Geniostoma ligustrifolium (Geniostomaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85, suppl.: 126.Google Scholar
  26. Erbar, C., Leins, P. 1999. Secondary pollen presentation and a curious rupture of the style in Spigelia (Spigeliaceae, Gentianales). Pl. Biol. (Stuttgart) 1: 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foster, C., Conn, B.J., Henwood, M.J., Ho, S. 2014. Molecular data support Orianthera: a new genus of Australian Loganiaceae. Telopea 16: 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frasier, C.L. 2008. Evolution and systematics of the angiosperm order Gentianales with an in-depth focus on Loganiaceae and its species-rich and toxic genus Strychnos. Ph.D. Thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Gadella, T.W.J. 1962. Some cytological studies in the Loganiaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 11: 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gadella, T.W.J. 1963. Some cytological studies in the Loganiaceae II. Verh. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Ser. C, 66: 265–269.Google Scholar
  31. Gadella, T.W.J. 1967. Some cytological studies in the Loganiaceae IV. Verh. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Ser. C, 70: 302–304.Google Scholar
  32. Gadella, T.W.J. 1969. Chromosome numbers of some Angiospermae collected in Cameroun and the Ivory Coast. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Ser. C, 72: 306–310.Google Scholar
  33. Gadella, T.W.J. 1970. Chromosome numbers of some angiosperms collected in Cameroun and the Ivory Coast II. Acta Bot. Neerl. 19: 431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gadella, T.W.J. 1972. Cytological studies on some flowering plants collected in Africa. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 42: 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gadella, T.W.J. 1977. In: Löve, A. (ed.) IOPB Chromosome number reports LVI. Taxon 26: 257–274.Google Scholar
  36. Gadella, T.W.J. 1978. In: Löve, A. (ed.) IOPB Chromosome number reports LXI. Taxon 27: 392.Google Scholar
  37. Gadella, T.W.J. 1980. Loganiaceae. Cytology. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 28b(1). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 202–210.Google Scholar
  38. Gibbons, K.L., Conn, B.J., Henwood, M.J. 2012. Phylogenetic relationships in Loganieae (Loganiaceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA sequence data. Austr. Syst. Bot. 25: 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gibbons, K.L., Conn, B.J., Henwood, M.J. 2014. The Australasian genus Schizacme (Loganiaceae): new combinations and new species in the New Zealand flora. Telopea 17: 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gould, K.R. 1997. Systematic studies in Spigelia. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  41. Grant, J.R. 2009. A revision of neotropical Bonyunia (Loganiaceae: Antonieae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hair, J.B. 1963. Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora. 6. New Zeal. J. Bot. 1: 243–257.Google Scholar
  43. Hakki, M.I. 1980. Loganiaceae. Embryology. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 28b(1). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 192–201.Google Scholar
  44. Hakki, M.I. 1998. On floral morphology and embryology of Usteria guineensis Willd. (Loganiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 120: 275–293.Google Scholar
  45. Hallé, N., Florence, J. 1986. Description de 10 espèces rares de plantes à fleures de l’ile de Rapa. In: Rapa: Direction des centres d’expérimentations nucléaires, pp. 129–149. Service Mixte de Contrôle Biologique, ORSTOM, France.Google Scholar
  46. Hilton-Taylor, C. 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  47. Jensen, S.R. 1992. Systematic implications of the distribution of iridoids and other chemical compounds in the Loganiaceae and other families of the Asteridae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keighery, G.J. 1975. In: Löve, A. (ed.) IOPB Chromosome number reports XLIX. Taxon 24: 501–516.Google Scholar
  49. Kerharo, J., Adams, J.G. 1974. La pharmacopée sénégalaise traditionnelle. Plantes médicinales et toxiques. Paris: Vigot.Google Scholar
  50. Leenhouts, P.W. 1962 [1963]. Loganiaceae. In: van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.) Flora Malesiana, Ser. 1, vol. 6(2). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, pp. 293–387.Google Scholar
  51. Leeuwenberg, A.J.M., Leenhouts, P.W. 1980. Loganiaceae. Taxonomy. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 28b(1). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 22–96.Google Scholar
  52. Lewis, W.H., Stripling, H.L., Ross, R.G. 1962. Chromosome numbers for some angiosperms of the southern United States and Mexico. Rhodora 64: 147–161.Google Scholar
  53. Li, P.-T., Leeuwenberg, A.J.M. 1996. Loganiaceae. In: Raven, P.H., Wu, Z. (eds.) Flora of China 14. Beijing: Science Press, pp. 320–338.Google Scholar
  54. Machado, C.G., Coelho, A.G., Santana, C.S., Rodrigues, M. 2007. Hummingbirds and their flowers in the ‘campos rupestres’ of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, northeastern Brazil. Rev. Brasil. Ornith. 15: 267–279.Google Scholar
  55. Mangenot, S., Mangenot, G. 1957. Deuxième liste nombres chromosomiques nouveaux chez diverses dicotylédones et monocotylédones d’Afrique occidentale. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 27: 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mangenot, S., Mangenot, G. 1958. Deuxième liste nombres chromosomiques nouveaux chez diverses dicotylédones et monocotylédones d’Afrique occidentale. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 28: 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mangenot, S., Mangenot, G. 1962. Enquête sur les nombres chromosomiques nouveaux dans une collection d’espèces tropicales. Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. 25: 411–447.Google Scholar
  58. Mann, H. 1866. Enumeration of Hawaiian plants. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 7: 196–197.Google Scholar
  59. Mennega, A.M.W. 1980. Loganiaceae. Anatomy of the secondary xylem. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 28b(1). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 112–161.Google Scholar
  60. Meyer, J.-Y. 1996. Espèces et espaces menacés de la Société et des Marquises. Contribution à la biodiversité de Polynésie française N°1–5. Délégation à l’Environnement/Délégation à la Recherche, Papeete, Tahiti.Google Scholar
  61. Miège, J. 1960. Nombres chromosomiques de plantes d’Afrique occidentale. Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. 21: 373–384.Google Scholar
  62. Mohrbutter, C. 1936. Embryologische studien an Loganiaceen. Planta 26: 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Molina, J., Struwe, L. 2004. Neuburgia novocaledonica, comb. nov. and the first record of domatia in the family Loganiaceae. Austr. Syst. Bot. 17: 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moore, R.J. 1947. Cytotaxonomic studies of the Loganiaceae I. Chromosome numbers and phylogeny in the Loganiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 34: 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mori, S.A., Brown, J.L. 1994. Report on wind dispersal in a lowland moist forest in central French Guiana. Brittonia 46: 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mori, S.A., Cremers, G., Gracie, C., de Granville, J.-J., Hoff, M., Mitchell, J.D. 2002. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Central French Guiana. Part 2. Dicotyledons. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Garden 76(2).Google Scholar
  67. Motley, T.J., Carr, G.D. 1998. Artificial hybridization in the Hawaiian endemic genus Labordia (Loganiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85: 654–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Motley, T.J., Cross, H.B. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography, and breeding system evolution among Hawaiian Labordia and Pacific (New Zealand) Geniostoma species (Loganiaceae). XVI International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, MO: abstract 66.Google Scholar
  69. Netolitzky, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermensamen. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, II. Bd. 10 (Berlin): 266–267.Google Scholar
  70. Olmstead, R.G., Bremer, B., Scott, K.M., & Palmer, J.D. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 700–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Olmstead, R.G, dePamphilis, C.W., Wolfe, A.D., Young, N.D., Elisons, W.J., Reeves, P.A. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Oxelman, B., Bremer, B. 2000. Discovery of paralogous nuclear gene sequences coding for the second-largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB2) and their phylogenetic utility in Gentianales of the asterids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1131–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Oxelman, B., Backlund, B., Bremer, B. 1999. Relationships of Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24: 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Popovkin, A.V., Mathews, K.G., Mendes Santos, J.C., Carmen Molina, M. Struwe, L. 2011. Spigelia genuflexa (Loganiaceae), a new geocarpic species from the Atlantic forest of northeastern Bahia, Brazil. PhytoKeys 6: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Punt, W. 1980. Pollen morphology. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 28b(1). Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, pp. 162–191.Google Scholar
  76. Quattrocchi, U. 2016. CRC World Dictionary of Medicinal and Poisonous Plants: Common Names, Scientific Names, Eponyms, Synonyms, and Etymology. CRC Press: Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  77. Rageau, J. 1973. Les plantes médicinales de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Trav. Doc. ORSTOM 23: 91.Google Scholar
  78. Raghavan, R.S. 1959. Chromosome numbers in Indian plants III. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B 49: 239–244.Google Scholar
  79. Rattenbury, J.A. 1980. Dioecy in Geniostoma ligustrifolium. Auckland Bot. Soc. Newsletter January 1980: 8–10.Google Scholar
  80. Reddy, A.S., Rao, Y.B.N., Khanam, A., Durga, I.S. 1999. A contribution to the embryology of Mitreola oldenlandioides Wall. Phytomorphology 49: 283–287.Google Scholar
  81. Rock, J.F. 1913. The indigenous trees of the Hawaiian Islands. Published privately, Honolulu. Pp. 401–406, 536. [Republished, with introduction by S. Carlquist and addendum by D.R. Herbst, 1974, by Charles E. Tuttle Co., Rutland, VT]Google Scholar
  82. Rogers, G.K. 1986. The genera of Loganiaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 67: 143–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Scherff, E.E. 1939. Genus Labordia. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. XVII (6): 449–546.Google Scholar
  84. Schmelzer, G.H., Ameenah Gurib-Fakim (eds.) 2008. Medicinal Plants, vol. 1. Wageningen, Netherlands: PROTA.Google Scholar
  85. Schultes, R.E. 1977. De plantis toxicariis e mundo novo tropicale commentationes XV. Desfontainia: a new Andean hallucinogen. Harvard Bot. Mus. Leafl. 25: 99–104.Google Scholar
  86. Selling, O.H. 1947. Studies in Hawaiian pollen statistics, Part II. B. P. Bishop Museum Special Publ. 38: 287–290.Google Scholar
  87. Sinnott, E.W. 1914. Investigations on the phylogeny of the angiosperms. I. The anatomy of the node as an aid in the classification of angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 1(7): 303–322, pl. 30–35.Google Scholar
  88. Skottsberg, C. 1936. Vascular plants from the Hawaiian Islands. II. Acta Horti Gotoburgensis 10: 97–193.Google Scholar
  89. Smith, N.M. 1991. Ethnobotanical field notes from the Northern Territory, Australia. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 14: 1–44.Google Scholar
  90. Smith, A.C., Stone, B.C. 1962. Studies of Pacific Island plants. XVII. The genus Geniostoma (Loganiaceae) in the New Hebrides, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga. Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 37: 1–42.Google Scholar
  91. Solereder, H. 1892–1895. Loganiaceae. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. IV, 2: 19–48 (1892), 49–50 (1895). Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  92. Struwe, L. 2004. Loganiaceae (Logania or Strychnine family). In: Smith, N., Mori, S.A., Henderson, N., Stevenson, D.W., Heald, S.V. (eds.) Flowering plants of the Neotropics. Princeton, New Jersey: The New York Botanical Garden Press and Princeton University Press, pp. 219–221.Google Scholar
  93. Struwe, L., Albert, V.A. 1997. Floristics, cladistics, and classification: three case studies in Gentianales. In: Dransfield, J., Coode, M.J.E., Simpson, D.A. (eds.) Plant diversity in Malesia III. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp.321–352.Google Scholar
  94. Struwe, L., Albert, V.A. (eds.) 2002. Gentianaceae: Systematics and natural history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Struwe, L., Albert, V.A., Bremer, B. 1994 [1995]. Cladistics and family level classification of the Gentianales. Cladistics 10: 175–206.Google Scholar
  96. Tiagi, Y.D., Kshetrapal, S. 1972. Studies on the floral anatomy, evolution of the gynoecium and the relationships of the family Loganiaceae. Adv. Pl. Morph. 1972: 408–416.Google Scholar
  97. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Services) 2002. Species Information Threatened and Endangered Animals and Plants homepage, http://endangered.fws.gov/ [accessed June 12, 2002]
  98. Valeton, T. 1902. Einige Notizen über neue und schon bekannte Arten der Gattung Geniostoma. Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg 12: 1–29.Google Scholar
  99. Vinckier, S., Smets, E. 2002. Morphology, ultrastructure and typology of orbicules in family Loganiaceae s. l. and related genera, in relation to systematics. Rev. Palaeobot. Palyn. 119: 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wagner, W.L., Herbst, D.R., Sohmer, S.H. 1990. Loganiaceae. In: Wagner, W.L., Herbst, D.R., Sohmer, S.H. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press and Bishop Museum Press, pp. 850–864.Google Scholar
  101. Whistler, W.A. 1990. Ethnobotany of the Cook Islands: The plants, their Maori names, and their uses. Allertonia 5: 393–394.Google Scholar
  102. Wightman, G., Dilkbarri, D., Williams, L., Dalywaters, I. 1992. Mudburra ethnobotany Aboriginal plant use from Kulumindini (Elliot), Northern Australia. NT Bot. Bull. 14: 1–44.Google Scholar
  103. Yamazaki, T. 1963. Embryology of Mitrasacme alsinoides var. indica. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Imp. Univ., Ser. 4, Boil. 29: 201–205.Google Scholar
  104. Yang, L-L., Li, H-L., Wei, L., Yang, T., Kuang, D-Y., Li, M-H., Liao, Y-Y., Chen, Z-D., Wu, H., Zhang, S-Z. 2016. A supermatrix approach provides a comprehensive genus-level phylogeny for Gentianales. J. Syst. Evol. 54: 400–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zepernick, B. 1972. Arzneipflanzen der Polynesier. Baessler Arch. Beih. 8: 69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Struwe
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. L. Gibbons
    • 2
  • B. J. Conn
    • 3
  • T. J. Motley
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, & Natural ResourcesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain TrustSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.John Ray Herbarium, School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations