Skip to main content

Computational Thinking in K-12: In-service Teacher Perceptions of Computational Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) has been described as a problem-solving approach that draws from the practices of computer science (CS). Computer science ideas and practices influence multiple domains, from simplifying complex tasks and problems through problem decomposition to using automation to increase the speed and efficiency of solving those problems. Computational thinking is, thus, described as a set of mental skills, a disposition common to most fields, and computer science concepts that can impact those fields decontextualized from programming and hardware. Researchers and educators have worked to integrate CT into multiple subjects in K-12. This takes the form of both identifying instances of CT already being used in existing teacher practices and identifying areas where disciplinary practices can be changed through the latest application of computational tools. This chapter reports the results from a study to examine practicing teachers’ views of CT and how those views compare to how computer science education researchers define CT. Results from this study suggest that teachers’ conceptions of CT include important aspects of the CT literature, yet there are several common misconceptions about CT. We discuss implications of our findings on how to engage non-computing K-12 teachers in computational thinking and develop their competencies to incorporate CT within the context of their subject area. The goal of this discussion is to inform in-service and preservice teacher development efforts and clarify how CT applies to disciplinary knowledge within K-12 education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the american educational research association, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1–25).

    Google Scholar 

  • The College Board. (2014). AP Computer Science Principles: 2016–2017. Retrieved from https://advancesinap.collegeboard.org/stem/computer-science-principles/course-details

  • DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, P. J. (2009). Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. H., & Lu, J. J. (2009). Education: Human computing skills: Rethinking the K-12 experience. Association for computing machinery. Communications of the ACM, 52(2), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional research service. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf

  • Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T. L., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C. K., Herman, J., Schneider, S. A., Madden, S., & Jones, B. (2011). Integrating literacy and science in biology: Teaching and learning impacts of reading apprenticeship professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 647–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12 a review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 798–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indiana Department of Education (2017). Indiana academic standards: Science & computer science. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/standards/science-computer-science.

  • Lee, I., Martin, F., & Apone, K. (2014). Integrating computational thinking across the K–8 curriculum. ACM Inroads, 5(4), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., & Settle, A. (2014). Computational thinking in K-9 education. In Proceedings of the working group reports of the 2014 on innovation & technology in computer science education conference (pp. 1–29). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2010). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States (Ed.). (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e000xna&AN=867791.

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D., & Kurland, D. M. (1984). On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas in Psychology, 2(2), 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Berretta, R. (2014). Digital technology teachers’ perceptions of computer science: It is not all about programming. In 2014 I.E. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby, C. C. (2015). Relationships: Computational thinking, pedagogy of programming, and bloom’s taxonomy. In Proceedings of the workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 80–87). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Texas State Board of Education (2012). Chapter 111. Texas essential knowledge and skills for mathematics subchapter a. Elementary. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter111/ch111a.html

  • Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2017). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding a 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60, 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011, March). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 465–470). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aman Yadav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sands, P., Yadav, A., Good, J. (2018). Computational Thinking in K-12: In-service Teacher Perceptions of Computational Thinking. In: Khine, M. (eds) Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93565-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93566-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics