Cyber-Physical Sensors and Devices for the Provision of Next-Generation Personalized Services

  • Borja BordelEmail author
  • Teresa Iturrioz
  • Ramón Alcarria
  • Diego Sánchez-de-Rivera
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 773)


Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are set to radically transform the world we live in. Prototypes for very different domains have been reported, from Industry 4.0 to Ambient Intelligence and the Internet of Things. Several research works have shown the good performance of these systems, which could be useful for everyday living once they become commercial products. However, no complete application for cyber-physical devices has been reported yet. Thus, the large amount of benefits this new paradigm may push remains very difficult to envision by general society and companies. In any case, personalized services rank among the most direct and interesting applications for cyber-physical devices. So far, no work on this topic has been reported, but the implementation of this new generation of services is a key area for the advancement toward the CPS era. Therefore, in this paper we will explore the concept of cyber-physical personalized services and propose a first example of these new services based on cyber-physical sensors and a cyber-physical device: a smart table. Finally, in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed solution, we will carry out an experimental validation.


Cyber-Physical Systems RFID Humanized computing Smart object Personalized services 



Borja Bordel has received funding from the Ministry of Education through the FPU program (grant number FPU15/03977). Additionally, the research leading to these results has received funding from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through SEMOLA project (TEC2015-68284-R) and from the Autonomous Region of Madrid through MOSI-AGIL-CM project (grant P2013/ICE-3019, co-funded by EU Structural Funds FSE and FEDER).


  1. 1.
    Bordel, B., Alcarria, R., Robles, T., Martín, D.: Cyber–physical systems: extending pervasive sensing from control theory to the internet of things. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 40, 156–184 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sánchez, B.B., Alcarria, R., de Rivera, D.S., Sánchez-Picot, Á.: Enhancing process control in industry 4.0 scenarios using cyber-physical systems. JoWUA 7(4), 41–64 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, E.A.: Cyber-physical systems-are computing foundations adequate. In: Position Paper for NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap, vol. 2, October 2006Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bordel Sánchez, B., Alcarria, R., Martín, D., Robles, T.: TF4SM: a framework for developing traceability solutions in small manufacturing companies. Sensors 15(11), 29478–29510 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robles, T., Alcarria, R., Martín, D., Morales, A., Navarro, M., Calero, R., López, M., et al.: An internet of things-based model for smart water management. In: Proceedings of 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 821–826. IEEE, May 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pérez-Jiménez, M., Sánchez, B.B., Alcarria, R.: T4AI: a system for monitoring people based on improved wearable devices. Res. Briefs Inf. Commun. Technol. Evol. (ReBICTE) 2, 1–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt, A.: Implicit human computer interaction through context. Pers. Technol. 4(2–3), 191–199 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bordel, B., Alcarria, R., Martín, D., Robles, T., de Rivera, D.S.: Self-configuration in humanized cyber-physical systems. J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput. 8(4), 485–496 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hong, J., Suh, E.H., Kim, J., Kim, S.: Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4), 7448–7457 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morales, A., Alcarria, R., Martín, D., Robles, T.: Enhancing evacuation plans with a situation awareness system based on end-user knowledge provision. Sensors 14(6), 11153–11178 (2014). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, W.L., Jung, C.F.: A hybrid approach for personalized service staff recommendation. Inf. Syst. Front. 19(1), 149–163 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sánchez, B.B., de Rivera, D.S., Sánchez-Picot, A.: Building unobtrusive wearable devices: an ergonomic cybernetic glove. J. Internet Serv. Inf. Secur. 6(2), 37–52 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martín, D., Bordel, B., Alcarria, R., Sánchez-Picot, Á., de Rivera, D.S., Robles, T.: Improving learning tasks for mentally handicapped people using AmI environments based on cyber-physical systems. In: International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, pp. 166–177. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stehr, M.O., Talcott, C., Rushby, J., Lincoln, P., Kim, M., Cheung, S., Poggio, A.: Fractionated software for networked cyber-physical systems: research directions and long-term vision. In: Formal Modeling: Actors, Open Systems, Biological Systems, pp. 110–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herlihy, L., Golen, E., Reznik, L., Lyshevski, S.E.: Secure communication and signal processing in inertial navigation systems. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO), pp. 414–419. IEEE, April 2017Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu, L.L.: Improving system reliability for cyber-physical systems (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University) (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bellavista, P., Giannelli, C.: Cyber physical sensors and actuators for privacy-and cost-aware optimization of user-generated content provisioning. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 15, 7172–7205 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Javed, F., Ali, U., Nabeel, M., Khalid, Q., Arshad, N., Ikram, J.: SmartDSM: a layered model for development of demand side management in smart grids. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges for the Smart Grid, pp. 15–20. ACM, June 2014Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stergiopoulos, G., Valvis, E., Anagnou-Misyris, F., Bozovic, N., Gritzalis, D.: Interdependency analysis of junctions for congestion mitigation in transportation infrastructures (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kureshi, I., Theodoropoulos, G., Mangina, E., O’Hare, G., Roche, J.: Towards an info-symbiotic decision support system for disaster risk management. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications, pp. 85–91. IEEE Press, October 2015Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyshevski, S.E.: Signal processing in cyber-physical MEMS sensors: inertial measurement and navigation systems. IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Basta, S., Manco, G., Masciari, E., Pontieri, L.: 20+ years of analytics on complex data: impact, issues, challenges and contributions. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Masciari, E., Saccà, D. (eds.) A Comprehensive Guide Through the Italian Database Research Over the Last 25 Years. Studies in Big Data, vol. 31, pp. 353–374. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Das, S.K., Cook, D.J.: Agent based health monitoring in smart homes. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics (ICOST), Singapore, pp. 3–14, 15–17 September 2004Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le Gal, C., Martin, J., Lux, A., Crowley, J.L.: Smart office: design of an intelligent environment. IEEE Intell. Syst. 4, 60–66 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lesser, V., Atighetchi, M., Benyo, B., Horling, B., Raja, A., Wagner, T., Xuan, P., Zhang, S.: The intelligent home testbed. In: Proceedings of the Autonomy Control Software Workshop, Seattle, WA, USA, 29 January 1999Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tokuda, H., Takashio, K., Nakazawa, J., Matsumiya, K., Ito, M., Saito, M.: SF2: Smart furniture for creating ubiquitous applications. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applications and the Internet, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 423–429, 26–30 January 2004. Sensors 2015, 15 29509 59Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hagale, A.R., Kelley, J.E., Rozich, R.: RFID smart office chair. US Patent 6,964,370, 15 Nov 2005. 61Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fishkin, K.P., Philipose, M., Rea, A.: Hands-on RFID: wireless wearables for detecting use of objects. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan, pp. 38–43, 18–21 October 2005Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Marculescu, D.: Electronic textiles: a platform for pervasive computing. IEEE Proc. 91, 1995–2018 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sakurai, S.: Prediction of sales volume based on the RFID data collected from apparel shops. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 1(2–3), 174–182 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Giochi SmartPoker. Accessed 18 Feb 2018
  33. 33.
    Argos Smart Clinical Cupboard. Accessed 18 Feb 2018
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    SATO’s VINICITY Technology. Accessed 18 Feb 2018
  36. 36.
    Bordel, B., Alcarria, R.: Assessment of human motivation through analysis of physiological and emotional signals in industry 4.0 scenarios. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 4(6), 1–21 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Borja Bordel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Teresa Iturrioz
    • 1
  • Ramón Alcarria
    • 1
  • Diego Sánchez-de-Rivera
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Politécnica de MadridMadridEspaña

Personalised recommendations