Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Language-Based Methodologies for Policy and Leadership Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complementary Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Policy Studies

Abstract

This chapter introduces language-based methodologies and methods, which we argue are particularly relevant to education policy and leadership studies. The chapter discusses critical discourse analysis (CDA), discursive psychology (DP), and conversation analysis (CA) (including membership categorization analysis). First, the chapter provides a general discussion of language-based methodologies. Second, the chapter presents CDA, DP, and CA and highlights the following for each methodological approach: (1) the primary research focus; (2) key features or characteristics; (3) the relevant education policy and/or leadership literature, which has employed CDA, DP, and/or CA; and (4) primary resources for those new to such methodologies and methods. Third, it provides three illustrative examples. Finally, the chapter concludes with suggestions for policy and leadership scholars interested in the study of language writ large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note for those working substantively in education: Rebecca Roger’s (2011) writing around CDA in education may be particularly useful.

References

  • Abrahamsen, H., & Aas, M. (2016). School leadership for the future: Heroic or distributed? Translating international discourses in Norwegian policy documents. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(1), 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. T. (2015). The discursive construction of lower-tracked students: Ideologies of meritocracy and the politics of education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(110). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2141.

  • Antaki, C., Billing, M. G., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. A. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1. https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/open/2002/002/antaki2002002-paper.html

  • Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, B., & Bound, A. M. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of no promo homo policies in US schools. Educational Studies, 51(4), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzul, J. (2014). Critical discourse analysis and science education texts: Employing Foucauldian notions of discourse and subjectivity. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 36(5), 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2012). Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy, 11(3), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E., Greenstein, A., Bragg, J., Hanley, T., Kalambouka, A., Lupton, R., & Winter, L. (2017). Subjects of, or subject to, policy reform? A Foucauldian discourse analysis of regulation and resistance in UK narratives of educational impacts of welfare cuts: The case of the ‘bedroom tax’. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(26). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2320.

  • Dooly, M., & Unamuno, V. (2009). Multiple languages in one society: Categorisations of language and social cohesion in policy and practice. Journal of Education Policy, 24(3), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4(3–4), 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2011). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 147–155). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 357–378). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality—Volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, R. (2017). Constructing teacher effectiveness in policymaking conversations. In J. N. Lester, C. R. Lochmiller, & R. Gabriel (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation (pp. 219–240). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, R., & Lester, J. N. (2013). Sentinels guarding the grail: Value-added measurement and the quest for education reform. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 20(9). Retrieved from: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1165

  • Gabriel, R., & Paulus, T. (2015). Committees and controversy consultants in the construction of education policy. Educational Policy, 29(7), 984–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814531650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D. (2015). The microanalysis online data: Methodological developments. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houen, S., Danby, S., Farrell, A., & Thorpe, K. (2016). ‘I wonder what you know…’ teachers designing requests for factual information. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, L. P. (2011). Discourses of racist nativism in California public education: English dominance as racist nativist microaggressions. Educational Studies, 47(4), 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, T. M. (2017). The discursive construction of superintendent statesmanship on Twitter. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy-Lewis, B. L. (2014). Using critical policy analysis to examine competing discourses in zero tolerance legislation: Do we really want to leave no child behind? Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 165–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2014). Discursive psychology: Methodology and application. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N., & Paulus, T. M. (2014). “That teacher takes everything badly”: Discursively reframing non-normative behaviors in therapy sessions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(5), 641–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N., Lochmiller, C. R., & Gabriel, R. (2016). Locating and applying critical discourse analysis within education policy: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(102). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2768.

  • Lester, J. N., White, F. A., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2017a). Language-based approaches to the study of education policy. In J. N. Lester, C. R. Lochmiller, & R. Gabriel (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N., Lochmiller, C. R., & Gabriel, R. (2017b). Exploring the intersection of education policy and discourse analysis: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(25). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2971.

  • Lester, J. N., Lochmiller, C. R., & Gabriel, R. (Eds.). (2017c). Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M., Jones, L., Holmes, R., & MacRae, C. (2012). Becoming a problem: Behaviour and reputation in the early years classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, R. (2006). Conversation analysis. In M. Slade & S. Priebe (Eds.), Choosing methods in mental health research: Mental health research from theory to practice (pp. 24–46). Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musk, N. J. (2006). Performing bilingualism in Wales with the spotlight on Welsh: A study of language policy and the language practices of young people in bilingual education. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nudzor, H. P. (2013). Unearthing the discursive shift in the ‘fCUBE’ policy implementation in Ghana: Using critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36(2), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. (2017). Membership categorization analysis in education policy research. In J. Lester, C. Lochmiller, & R. Gabriel (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, P. (2014). The media got it wrong! A critical discourse analysis of changes to the educational policy making arena. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(36). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n36.2014.

  • Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 200–221). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2 quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 111–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–293). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Manning, M. (2014). Critical narrative analysis: The interplay of critical discourse and narrative analyses. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M., & Prieto, H. P. (2014). In between self-knowledge and school demands: Policy enacted in the Swedish middle-year classroom. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(4), 554–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Keogh, J., & Hay, S. (2015). Discourses of the good parent in attributing school success. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 452–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (2015). Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourses: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzuner-Smith, S., & Englander, K. (2015). Exposing ideology within university policies: A critical discourse analysis of faculty hiring, promotion and remuneration practices. Journal of Education Policy, 30(1), 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 349–371). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology: Theory, methods, and application. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilinski, B. (2017). Knowing and interpreting prekindergarten policy: A Bakhtinian analysis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(27). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2211.

  • Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Myers (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Jessica Nina Lester & Justin Paulsen

Authors
  1. Jessica Nina Lester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justin Paulsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Nina Lester .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Chad R. Lochmiller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lester, J.N., Paulsen, J. (2018). Language-Based Methodologies for Policy and Leadership Research. In: Lochmiller, C. (eds) Complementary Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Policy Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93538-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93539-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation