Advertisement

Maps for Easy Paths (MEP): A Mobile Application for City Accessibility

  • S. Comai
  • E. De Bernardi
  • F. Salice
  • A. Vali
Chapter
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

Maps for Easy Paths (MEP) project aims to improve accessibility of our cities, by collecting data of urban barriers and accessible paths using mobile devices. Its focus is on users with motor impairments; however, the application design takes into account also some characteristics of other kinds of disabilities. In this chapter, we describe the MEP project in general and present our mobile applications and their design to meet the requirements of usability, accessibility, and usefulness. In particular, we report our usability–accessibility evaluation done both with automatic tools and with manual/visual analysis and describe the experience in using it in different cities and in campaigns with middle and high school students, to understand the perceived usefulness and its ease of use.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by Polisocial Award, Politecnico di Milano, Italy. We wish to thank the whole MEP team, the schools that participated in the campaigns, and the MEP users.

References

  1. 1.
    Axsmap.: http://www.axsmap.com/. Cited 28/11/2017
  2. 2.
    Bardaro G, Vali A, Comai S, Matteucci M (2015) Accessible urban routes reconstruction by fusing mobile sensors data. In: 13th international conference on advances in mobile computing & multimedia (MoMM), Bruxelles, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bromley RD, Matthews DL, Thomas CJ (2007) City center accessibility for wheelchair users: the consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities 24:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardonha C, Gallo D, Avegliano P, Herrmann R, Koch F, Borger S (2013) A crowdsourcing platform for the construction of accessibility maps. In: Proceedings of the 10th international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013, pp 26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comai S, De Bernardi E, Matteucci M, Salice F (2016) Maps for easy paths (MEP): enriching maps with accessible paths using MEP Traces, − 2nd EAI international conference on smart objects and technologies for social good, GOODTECHS 2016, ISSN: 1867–8211, Venice, Italy, pp. 254–263Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comai S, De Bernardi E, Matteucci M, Salice F (2017) Maps for easy paths (MEP): accessible paths tracking and reconstruction. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things 3(9):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Comai S, Kayange D, Mangiarotti R, Matteucci M, Ugur Yavuz S, Valentini F (2015) Mapping city accessibility: review and analysis. In: Proceedings 13th international conference on advancing assistive technology and eAccessibility for people with disabilities (AAATE’15), Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Harrison R, Flood D, Duce D (2013) Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J Interact Sci 1(1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0827-1-1
  10. 10.
    ISO 9241–11:1998: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – part 11: guidance on usability. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004 – standardization and related activities – general vocabulary. https://www.iso.org/standard/39976.html
  12. 12.
    Iwasawa Y, Ikuko EY, Yutaka M (2016) Combining human action sensing of wheelchair users and machine learning for autonomous accessibility data collection. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 99(4):1153–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Map for easy paths project web site http://mep5x1000.wixsite.com/mepapp. Cited 28/11/2017
  14. 14.
    Mapability project web site. http://www.mapability.org. Cited 28/11/2017
  15. 15.
    Mapillary project web site. https://www.mapillary.com. Cited 28/11/2017
  16. 16.
    Matthews H et al (2003) Modelling access with GIS in Urban Systems (MAGUS): capturing the experiences of wheelchair users. Area 35:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, Shipp K, Hoenig H (2002) Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc Sci Med 55:1435–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mirri S, Prandi C, Salomoni P (2016) Personalizing pedestrian accessible way-finding with mPASS. In: Consumer communications & networking conference (CCNC), 2016 13th IEEE annual, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp 1119–1124Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/. Cited 28/11/2017
  20. 20.
    Shigeno K, et al (2013) Citizen sensing for collaborative construction of accessibility maps. In: Proceedings of the 10th international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013, pp 24Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wheely app. http://www.wheelyapp.com/. Cited 28/11/2017
  22. 22.
    Wheel Map. https://wheelmap.org. Cited 28/11/2017
  23. 23.
    Zhang D, Adipat B (2005) Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability of testing mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18(3):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e BioingegneriaPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations