Skip to main content

Surgical Technique, Subaxial Spine: Cervical Disc Replacement Revision Surgery

  • Chapter
  • 1672 Accesses

Abstract

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has a high success rate. However, failure may occur due to persistent radiculopathy or myelopathy, malposition, heterotopic ossification, infection, subsidence, bearing wear, sizing error, and vertebral body fracture. Preoperative planning prior to revision surgery requires a complete history and physical, operative note from the index surgery, identification of implant information, imaging (radiographs, CT, and/or MRI), and determination of the etiology of CDR failure. Explanting the device and performing a fusion with a cage or graft may be performed for one-level revision. Corpectomy and fusion should be considered for two or greater levels of CDR revision because it reduces the number of graft-bone interfaces that require fusion, provides a large amount of autograft, affords stability, and removes the fibrinous on growth that occurs under the baseplates from the original surgery. Revision is associated with a greater complication rate than primary CDR, and consideration must be given to mitigating factors that predispose to adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Fineberg SJ, et al. Comparison of revision surgeries for one- and two-level cervical TDR and ACDF from 2002 to 2011. Spine J. 2014;14(12):2841–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rihn JA, Radcliff K, Hipp J, et al. Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(3):106–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EU, et al. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2012;37(6):445–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hacker FM, Babcock RM, Hacker RJ. Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2013;38(26):2223–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skovrlj B, Lee DH, Caridi JM, et al. Reoperations following cervical disc replacement. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(3):471–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

VIDEO_justiniorio (MP4 64237 kb)

Data 53.1

iorio.ppt (PPTX 70569 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iorio, J.A., Koutsoumbelis, S., Kim, H.J., Albert, T.J. (2019). Surgical Technique, Subaxial Spine: Cervical Disc Replacement Revision Surgery. In: Koller, H., Robinson, Y. (eds) Cervical Spine Surgery: Standard and Advanced Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93432-7_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93432-7_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93431-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93432-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics