Skip to main content

The EU’s Strategy Towards External Gas Suppliers and Their Responses: Norway, Russia, Algeria and LNG

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

The EU has a range of policy tools for dealing with the challenges it faces in the regional and international gas trade: when 1) integrating Norway into the Single European Market (SEM), 2) coping with Russia, 3) securing supply of Algerian gas and 4) taking advantage of the rising global trade in LNG. Norway as a major gas exporter to the EU shares interests with other major gas suppliers, Russia and Algeria. This chapter analyses the EU’s approaches to the governance of regional gas markets and responses of Norway, Russia, Algeria and the countries that export LNG to the EU that have chosen various strategies of relating to EU regulatory and market power. Some sell gas at the EU border while others develop other forms of cooperation with the EU.

The authors would like to thank the participants of the NUPI’s EUNOR workshops in 2016 and 2017 for valuable feedback on earlier versions of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These issues are dealt with in detail in Chap. 2 of this book, whereas our focus is on how the EU has influenced the strategies of its key external gas suppliers.

  2. 2.

    This has been argued by, inter alia, Indra Øverland: see Chap. 4 in this volume.

  3. 3.

    See Chap. 6 of this volume for further details.

  4. 4.

    See Chap. 5 for more on this, as well as Russia’s formal and informal channels of influence.

  5. 5.

    https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/imports-and-secure-supplies/supplier-countries download. Retrieved 4 September 2016.

  6. 6.

    As discussed in detail by Indra Øverland in Chap. 4.

  7. 7.

    For more detailed examination of the special features of the energy relationship between Norway and the EU, see Chap. 6 of this volume by Ole Gunnar Austvik; Chap. 5 by Jakub M. Godzimirski deals with Norwegian—and Russian—strategies of influencing EU energy policy.

  8. 8.

    The Commission successfully settles GFU case with Norwegian gas producers; European Commission, IP/02/1084 17/07/2002, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-02-1084_en.htm.

  9. 9.

    As detailed by Godzimirski, Chap. 5 in this volume.

  10. 10.

    See Goldthau and Sitter, Chap. 2 in this volume.

  11. 11.

    This is also evident from the fact that its lobbying efforts in the EU have been minimal; see Godzimirski, Chap. 5 of this volume.

  12. 12.

    For the claim that EU regulation adds billions of euros to overall UK energy bills and that Brexit would make consumers better off, see ‘A chance to take £33bn burden off shoulders of small businesses’ http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/Politics/article1670391.ece and https://britain-europe.com/2016/03/24/the-costs-and-benefits-of-eu-energy-and-climate-policy/.

References

  • Aissaoui, A. (2016). Algerian Gas: Troubling Trends, Troubled Policies (OIES PAPER NG 108).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S. (1993). The Struggle Over North Sea Oil: Petroleum Policy in Denmark, Britain and Norway 1962–92. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S., Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2017). Energy Union: Europe’s New Liberal Mercantilism? London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S., & Sitter, N. (2009). The European Union Gas Market: Differentiated Integration and Fuzzy Liberalization. In G. Fermann (Ed.), Political Economy of Energy in Europe: Forces of Integration and Fragmentation (pp. 63–84). Berlin, Germany: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S., & Sitter, N. (2015a). The External Reach of the EU Regulatory State: Norway, Russia and the Security of Natural Gas Supplies. In I. Peters (Ed.), The European Union’s Foreign Policy in a Comparative Perspective: Beyond the “Actorness and Power” Debate (pp. 80–97). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S., & Sitter, N. (2015b). Managing Heterogeneity in the EU: Using Gas Market Liberalisation to Explore the Changing Mechanisms of Intergovernmental Governance. Journal of European Integration, 37(3), 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ask, A. O. (2017, November 8). Det er et sug etter norsk gass i Europa – ny eksportrekord. Aftenposten. https://www.aftenposten.no/okonomi/i/KE43o/Det-er-et-sug-etter-norsk-gass-i-Europa--ny-eksportrekord. Retrieved November 19, 2017.

  • Austvik, O. G. (2001). Gassdirektiv, GFU og norske interesser. Internasjonal politikk, 3, 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belyi, A. (2012). Russia’s Position on the Energy Charter. Meeting Summary: Russia and Eurasia Programme. http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Russia%20and%20Eurasia/270412summary.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2017.

  • Boussena, S., & Locatelli, C. (2013). Energy Institutions and Organisational Change in the EU and Russia: Revisiting Gas Relations. Energy Policy, 55, 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussena, S., & Locatelli, C. (2017). Gazprom and the Complexity of the EU Gas Market: A Strategy to Define. Post-Communist Economies, 29(4), 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP. (2017, June). BP Statistical Review of World Energy. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2017/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2017-full-report.pdf. Retrieved October 20, 2017.

  • Cameron, F. (2009). The Politics of EU–Russia Energy Relations. EU–Russia Energy Relations, EURUSSIA Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, H., Ladislaw, S., & Hudson, A. (2015). The US–EU Energy Relationship. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU Leadership in Energy and Environmental Governance? Global and Local Challenges and Responses (pp. 159–180). Houndmills, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correlje, A., & van der Linde, C. (2006). Energy Supply Security and Geopolitics: A European Perspective. Energy Policy, 34, 532–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbouche, H. (2011). Algeria’s Shifting Gas Export Strategy: Between Politics and Market Constraints. Oxford, UK: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.NG 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entelis, J. (2012). Sonatrach: The Political Economy of an Algerian State Institution. In D. G. Victor, D. R. Hults, & M. C. Thurber (Eds.), Oil and Governance: State-Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply (pp. 557–598). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, J., Bergesen, O. H., Moe, A., & Sydnes, A. K. (1988). Natural Gas in Europe: Markets, Organization and Politics. London: Pinters.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission. (2017). EU Invests €444 Million in Key Energy Infrastructure, Press Release IP/17/280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. (2012, January 15). UK Warned Over Dependence on Qatar Gas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franza, L. (2014). Long-Term Gas Import Contracts in Europe (CIEP Energy Papers 2014/08).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godzimirski, J. M. (Ed.). (2013). Russian Energy in a Changing World. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau, A. & Sitter, N. (2015a) A Liberal Actor in a Realist World. The European Union Regulatory State and the Global Political Economy of Energy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau, A. & Sitter, N. (2015b) Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 941-965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriev, L., Golyashev, A., & Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (2016). Razvitiye konkurrentsii na gazovykh rynkakh. Energeticheskii byulettin. Moscow: Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. http://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/9458.pdf. Retrieved October 20, 2017.

  • Gustafson, T. (1989) Crisis Amid Plenty. The Politics of Soviet Energy Under Breznev and Gorbachev, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (2014). The European Framework for Energy and Climate Policies. Energy Policy, 64, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2016). Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (2014, October 27). Lithuania Cheers ‘Independence’. Foreign Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, J. (2015, April 22). In Accusing Russian Energy Giant Gazprom, E.U. Begins a Test of Wills. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardaś, S. (2016). The Twilight of the Oil Eldorado: How the Activity of Russian Oil Companies on the EU Market Has Evolved. OSW Studies. Warsaw: OSW. https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/prace_55_ang_eldorado_net.pdf

  • Kardaś, S. (2017). At Crossroads. Current Problems of Russia’s Gas Sector. OSW Studies. Warsaw: OSW. https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/prace_63_ang_at-crossroads_net.pdf

  • Larsson, R. R. (2006). Russia’s Energy Policy: Security Dimensions and Russia’s Reliability as an Energy Supplier. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, M., Schnichels, D., & Svane, L. P. (2002). Liberalization of the European Gas Market – Commission Settles GFU Case with Norwegian Producers. Competition Policy Newsletter, 3, 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, P. (1994). Energy Policies of the European Union. London: EC Inform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, G., Behrens, A., Egenhofer, C., & Genoese, F. (2015). Europe’s Long Strategy in the Wider EU Gas Market. CEPS Policy Brief, 333. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/PB333_Europe%20LNG%20Strategy_0.pdf. Retrieved August 12, 2016.

  • Nosko, A., & Misik, M. (2017). No United Front: The Political Economy of Energy in Central and Eastern Europe. In S. S. Andersen, A. Goldthau, & N. Sitter (Eds.), Energy Union: Europe’s New Liberal Mercantilism? (pp. 201–222). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nyssens, H., Cultrera, C., & Schnichels, D. (2008). The Territorial Restrictions Case in the Gas Sector: A State of Play. Competition Policy Newsletter, 1, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orttung, R. W., & Overland, I. (2011). A Limited Toolbox: Explaining the Constraints on Russia’s Foreign Energy Policy. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2(1), 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2017a, January 27). Algeria Top Gas Supplier to Spain 2016, Eyes More EU Exports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2017b, September 7). Algeria to Increase Gas Output for Export – Sonatrach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, F., & Zeitlin, J. (2011). Experimentalist Governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 169–183). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2008). Russia and European Energy Security: Divide and Dominate. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talus, K. (2011). Long-term Natural Gas Contracts and Antitrust Law in the European Union and the United States. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 4(3), 260–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talus, K. (2012). Winds of Change: Long-term Gas Contracts and the Changing Energy Paradigms in the European Union. In C. Kuzemko, M. Keating, A. Goldthau, & A. Belyi (Eds.), Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia (pp. 227–242). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verda, M. (2015). The Foreign Dimension of EU Energy Policy: The Case of the Southern Gas Corridor. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU Leadership in Energy and Environmental Governance? Global and Local Challenges and Responses (pp. 69–86). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. (2009). Energy Security: Europe’s New Foreign Policy Challenge. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andersen, S.S., Sitter, N. (2019). The EU’s Strategy Towards External Gas Suppliers and Their Responses: Norway, Russia, Algeria and LNG. In: Godzimirski, J.M. (eds) New Political Economy of Energy in Europe. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93360-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics