Introduction: The EU and the Changing (Geo)Politics of Energy in Europe

  • Jakub M. GodzimirskiEmail author
  • Ole Gunnar Austvik
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


This introductory chapter has three purposes. First, it presents the background for this volume originating in a research project on European integration funded by the Research Council of Norway (RCN). Second, it explains why EU energy policy in this context deserves closer scrutiny looking at energy relationships between the EU and external suppliers of energy and the EU and member states. Finally, this chapter gives an overview of the content of this book and explains rationales for the choice of cases presenting how the EU projects its power, how external suppliers Norway, Russia, Algeria and LNG providers have responded and how the member states Germany, Poland and the three Baltic countries interact with the EU when implementing their energy policies.


Energy policyEnergy Policy Green Energy Systems suppliersSuppliers Godzimirski challengesChallenges 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Archer, C. (2005). Norway Outside the European Union: Norway and European Integration from 1994 to 2004. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Arnesen, F. (1995). Statlig Styring og EØS-Rettslige Skranker. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  3. Austvik, O. G. (2015). Negotiating and Adapting Optimal Integration: Transnational Economic Integration and the Public Management Challenge. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance (pp. 116–137). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Austvik, O. G., & Claes, D. H. (2011). EØS-Avtalen og Norsk Energipolitikk (EEA Agreement and Norwegian Energy Policy). Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  5. Bennett, C. J. (1991). What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bressand, A. (2012). The Changed Geopolitics of Energy and Climate and the Challenge for Europe. A Geopolitical and European Perspective on the Triple Agenda of Competition, Energy Security and Sustainability (Clingendal Clingendal International Energy Programme).Google Scholar
  7. Bressand, A. (2013). The Role of Markets and Investment in Global Energy. In A. Goldthau (Ed.), The Handbook of Global Energy Policy (pp. 15–29). London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claes, D. H. (2002). The Process of Europeanization: Norway and the Internal Energy Market. Journal of Public Policy, 22(3), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities. (2006). External Energy Relations – From Principles to Action. COM(2006) 590 Final. Brussels. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  10. Cowles, M. G., Caporaso, J. A., & Risse-Kappen, T. (2001). Transforming Europe Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. DIFI Norway. (2016). Utenforskapets Muligheter. Om Norsk Påvirkning Innenfor EØS Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  12. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review, 3(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eberlein, B. (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Energy Sector. In C. F. Sabel & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (pp. 61–78). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eberlein, B., & Kerwer, D. (2004). New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (1999). Differentiated Integration in Europe: The Case of EEA Country, Norway. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1), 133–142.Google Scholar
  17. Egenhofer, C., Genoese, F., & Dimitrova, A. (2014). Making the Most of Energy Union. CEPS Commentary. Brussels: CEPS. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  18. Egenhofer, C., Marcu, A., Núñez-Ferrer, J., Genoese, F., & Elkerbout, M. (2015). EU Climate and Energy Governance: There’s More to It Than Meets the Eye. CEPS Commentary. Brussels, Belgium: CEPS. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  19. Eriksen, E. O. (2015). The European Union’s Non-Members: Independence Under Hegemony? London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European, C. (1995). An Energy Policy for the European Union. Luxembourg/Lanham, MD: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities/UNIPUB.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. (2000). Green Paper – Towards a European Strategy for the Security of Energy Supply (E. Commission Ed.). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2006). Green Paper. A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2014a). European Energy Security Strategy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  24. European Commission. (2014b). In-Depth Study of European Energy Security. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  25. European Commission. (2014c). A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  26. European Commission. (2015). Energy Union: Advancing the Integration of European Energy Markets. IP/15/5142. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  27. European Commission Directorate-General for Energy. (2010). European Energy and Transport – Trends to 2030: Update 2009. Retrieved from Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  28. Folkerts-Landau, D. (2013). Energiewende 2.0 – Don’t Risk Competitiveness. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  29. Fox, A. B. (1959). The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War Two. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Godzimirski, J. M. (2014a). Mapping Eu Countries’ Relationships with Energy Suppliers. GR:EEN Policy Brief. University of Warwick. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  31. Godzimirski, J. M. (2014b). The Norwegian Energy Security Debate. In E. Moe & P. Midford (Eds.), Common Challenges, National Responses: The Political Economy of Renewable Energy and Energy Security in Japan, China and Northern Europe (pp. 116–136). London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2014). A Liberal Actor in a Realist World? The Commission and the External Dimension of the Single Market for Energy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1452–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015). A Liberal Actor in a Realist World: The European Union Regulatory State and the Global Political Economy of Energy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldthau, A., & Witte, J. M. (Eds.). (2010). Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game. Berlin, Germany/Washington, DC: Global Public Policy Institute/Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grätz, J. (2012). Unconventional Resources: The Shifting Geographies and Geopolitics of Energy. In D. Möckli (Ed.), Strategic Trends 2012. Key Developments in Global Affairs (pp. 79–102). Zurich, Switzerland: Center for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  36. Heubaum, H., & Biermann, F. (2015). Integrating Global Energy and Climate Governance: The Changing Role of the International Energy Agency. Energy Policy, 87, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and Conditions of Cross-National Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jong, D. d., Linde, C. v. d., & Smeenk, T. (2010). The Evolving Role of LNG in the Gas Market. In A. Goldthau & J. M. Witte (Eds.), Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game (pp. 195–220). Berlin, Germany/Washington, DC: Global Public Policy Institute/Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  40. Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  42. Ladrech, R. (2002). Europeanization and Political Parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Party Politics, 8(4), 389–403.Google Scholar
  43. Laxer, G. (1995). Social Solidarity, Democracy and Global Capitalism. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 32(3), 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lefeber, L., & Vietorisz, T. (2007). The Meaning of Social Efficiency. Review of Political Economy, 19(2), 139–164.Google Scholar
  45. Marcinkiewicz, K., & Tosun, J. (2015). Contesting Climate Change: Mapping the Political Debate in Poland. East European Politics, 31(2), 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Micco, P. d. (2014). The EU’s Energy Security Made Urgent by the Crimean Crisis. Brussels: European Parliament. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  47. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Norway. (2012). Utenfor Og Innenfor: Norges Avtaler Med EU (Outside and Inside: Norway’s Agreements with the EU). NOU: Vol. NOU 2012:2. Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Norway. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  48. Moravcsik, A. (2001). Federalism in the European Union: Rhetoric and Reality. In K. Nicolaidis & R. Howse (Eds.), Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (pp. 161–189). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Padgett, S. (1992). The Single European Energy Market: The Politics of Realization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 30(1), 53–76. Scholar
  50. Panke, D. (2010). Small States in the European Union: Coping with Structural Disadvantages. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  51. Panke, D. (2012). Small States in Multilateral Negotiations. What Have We Learned? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(3), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (Eds.). (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union : Towards a New Architecture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sandholtz, W. (2004). European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sartor, O., Spencer, T., Bart, I., Julia, P.-E., Gawlikowska-Fyk, A., Neuhoff, K., et al. (2014). The EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Framework and Energy Security. Climate Strategies. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
  55. Slominski, P. (2016). Energy and Climate Policy: Does the Competitiveness Narrative Prevail in Times of Crisis? Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M. E. (2011). A Liberal Grand Strategy in a Realist World? Power, Purpose and the EU’s Changing Global Role. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strange, S. (1988). States and Markets. London/New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Sweet, A. S., & Sandholtz, W. (1997). European Integration and Supranational Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 297–317. Scholar
  59. Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A. T., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: Between National Positions and Governance Innovation in EU Energy and Climate Policy. Climate Policy, 16(5), 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toje, A. (2011). The European Union as a Small Power. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Train, K. (1991). Optimal Regulation: The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Vital, D. (1967). The Inequality of States: A Study of the Small Power in International Relations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  63. World Trade Organization WTO. (2010). World Trade Report 2010. Trade in Natural Resources. Retrieved October 12, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI)OsloNorway
  2. 2.Norway UniversityLillehammerNorway

Personalised recommendations