Advertisement

Psychological Anthropology and the Study of Disability

  • Thomas S. Weisner
Chapter
Part of the Culture, Mind, and Society book series (CMAS)

Abstract

Autism understood in cultural context is as essential as autism understood as a neurological condition. Psychological Anthropology (PA) includes the comparative, contextual study of culture and mental life. PA aspires to be holistic, open to plural mixed methods, comparative, collaborative with other disciplines, and inclusive across the levels of analysis. This essay considers six themes in PA that also are reflected in the chapters in our volume: difference is both biological and social; diverse experiences of disability are central; cultural beliefs regarding disability vary widely around the world; disability is connected to other differences in society, including deprivation, exclusion and vulnerability due to race, class and resources; social and sociolinguistic mechanisms that are important for understanding disability also are important for studying many other topics in PA generally; and diverse family and parenting practices and everyday routine activities are important in the field of PA, perhaps especially so for ASD, as are the institutional and structural conditions in society that condition daily routines. The contributions of PA—particularly ecocultural theory, cultural models, and explanatory models of illness—are important for theory, methods, and empirical outcomes for autism spectrum conditions, and open up possibilities for new approaches to ASD.

References

  1. Bernheimer, Lucinda, and Thomas Weisner. 2007. “‘Let Me Just Tell You What I Do All Day …’: The Family Story at the Center of Intervention Research and Practice.” Infants and Young Children 20 (3): 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brezis, Rachel, Thomas Weisner, Tamara Daley, Nidhi Singhal, Merry Barua, and Shreya Chollera. 2015. “Parenting a Child with Autism in India: Narratives Before and After a Parent–Child Intervention Program.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 39 (2): 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, Alex, Vikram Patel, R. Thara, and Oye Gureje. 2008. “Questioning an Axiom: Better Prognosis for Schizophrenia in the Developing World?” Schizophrenia Bulletin 34 (2): 229–244.Google Scholar
  4. Daley, Tamara, Thomas Weisner, and Nidhi Singhal. 2014. “Adults with Autism in India: A Mixed-Method Approach to Make Meaning of Daily Routines.” Social Science and Medicine 116: 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edgerton, Robert. 1967. The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the Lives of the Mentally Retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1969. “On the ‘Recognition’ of Mental Illness.” In Changing Perspectives in Mental Illness, edited by Stanley C. Plog and Robert B. Edgerton, 49–72. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1992. Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Edgerton, Robert, and Alex Cohen. 1994. “Culture and Schizophrenia: The DOSMD Challenge.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 164 (2): 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fein, Elizabeth. 2015. “No One Has to Be Your Friend: Asperger’s Syndrome and the Vicious Cycle of Social Disorder in Late Modern Identity Markets.” Ethos 43 (1): 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallimore, Ronald, Jennifer Coots, Thomas Weisner, Helen Garnier, and Donald Guthrie. 1996. “Family Responses to Children with Early Developmental Delays II: Accommodation Intensity and Activity in Early and Middle Childhood.” American Journal on Mental Retardation 101: 215–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodley, Dan, and Claire Tregaskis. 2006. “Storying Disability and Impairment: Retrospective Accounts of Disabled Family Life.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (5): 630–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groce, Nora. 1985. Everybody Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha’s Vineyard. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1999. “Disability in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Rethinking Disability.” The Lancet 354 (9180): 756–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hay, Cameron, ed. 2016. Methods that Matter: Integrating Mixed Methods for More Effective Social Science Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ingstad, Benedicte, and Susan Whyte, eds. 1995. Disability and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kleinman, Arthur. 2008. “Commentary on Alex Cohen et al: ‘Questioning an Axiom: Better Prognosis for Schizophrenia in the Developing World.’” Schizophrenia Bulletin 34 (2): 249–250.Google Scholar
  17. Marshall, M. (1996). “Problematizing Impairment: Cultural Competence in the Carolines.” Ethnology 35 (94): 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy, Robert. 1987. The Body Silent: A Journey into Paralysis. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  19. Ochs, Elinor, and Olga Solomon. 2010. “Autistic Sociality.” Ethos 38 (1): 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ochs, Elinor, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Karen Sirota, and Olga Soloman. 2004. “Autism and the Social World: An Anthropological Perspective.” Discourse Studies 6 (2): 147–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orbuch, Terri. 1997. “People’s Accounts Count: The Sociology of Accounts.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 455–478.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, Debra, and Thomas S. Weisner. 2007. “Sociocultural Studies of Families of Children with Intellectual Disabilities.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 13: 302–312.Google Scholar
  23. Solomon, Olga, and Nancy Bagatell. 2010. “Introduction: Autism: Rethinking the Possibilities.” Ethos 38 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stiker, Henri-Jacques. 1997. A History of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Weisner, Thomas. 1996. “The 5 to 7 Transition as an Ecocultural Project.” In The Five to Seven Year Shift: The Age of Reason and Responsibility, edited by A.J. Sameroff and M.M. Haith, 295–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2002. “Ecocultural Understanding of Children’s Developmental Pathways.” Human Development 45 (4): 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2008. “Well Being and Sustainability of the Daily Routine of Life.” In The Good Life: Well-Being in Anthropological Perspective, edited by G. Mathews and C. Izquerdo, 349–380. New York: Berghahn Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2015. “Childhood: Anthropological Aspects.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 3, edited by James D. Wright, 451–458. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2017. “Culture, Context, and the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in the Study of Human Development.” In Advances in Culture and Psychology, edited by M. Gelfand, C.Y. Chiu, and Y.Y. Hong, chapter 4, 153–215. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zetlin, Andrea, Thomas Weisner, and Ronald Gallimore. 1985. “Diversity, Shared Functioning, and the Role of Benefactors: A Study of Parenting by Retarded Persons.” In Children of Handicapped Parents: Research and Clinical Perspectives, edited by S.K. Thurman, 69–95. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Weisner
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Psychiatry and AnthropologyUCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations