Skip to main content

Research on Sustainable Business Model Patterns: Status quo, Methodological Issues, and a Research Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainable Business Models

Abstract

This chapter describes avenues for future research to develop a “sustainable business model pattern language.” The chapter reflects on how sustainable business model (SBM) patterns can be identified, described, and turned into a design language to support the development of more sustainable organisations. Such organisations solve ecological, social, and economic problems through new approaches to proposing, delivering, capturing, and creating value. Theoretical and conceptual elements as well as methodological issues of developing an SBM pattern language are discussed. The value of using patterns in practice is illustrated with two business model innovation tools, one analogue and one digital, that use different patterns, including revenue and pricing, circular economy, and SBM patterns. Finally, questions for future research are proposed.

“The people can shape buildings for themselves, and have done it for centuries by using languages which I call pattern languages. A pattern language gives each person who uses it, the power to create an infinite variety of new and unique buildings, just as his ordinary language gives him the power to create an infinite variety of sentences.”

(Alexander 1979, p. 167)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Also referred to as “business models for sustainability” (e.g., Wells 2013). Both terms are used interchangeably in this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Since 2002, the Iba Lab at Keio University & CreativeShift Lab created 67 pattern languages including 1610 patterns; see http://web.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~iba/languages.html (as of April 2018).

References

  • Abdelkafi, N., and K. Täuscher. 2016. Business Models for Sustainability from a System Dynamics Perspective. Organization & Environment 29 (1): 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelkafi, N., S. Makhotin, and T. Posselt.2013. Business Model Innovations for Electric Mobility—What Can Be Learned from Existing Business Model Patterns?International Journal of Innovation Management17(1): Art. 1340003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. 1979. The Timeless Way of Building. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, and S. Angel. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, R., and H.-D. Zimmermann. 2001. Preface: Introduction to Special Section—Business Models. EM—Electronic Markets 11 (1): 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amshoff, B., C.Dülme, J.Echterfeld, and J.Gausemeier.2015. Business Model Patterns for Disruptive Technologies. International Journal of Innovation Management19 (3): Art. No. 1540002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltramello, A., L. Haie-Fayle, and D. Pilat. 2013. Why New Business Models Matter for Green Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisgaard, T., K. Henriksen, and M. Bjerre. 2012. Green Business Model Innovation—Conceptualisation, Next Practice and Policy. Oslo: Nordic Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., S. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2013. A Value Mapping Tool for Sustainable Business Modelling. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 13 (5): 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R., and J. Pinkse. 2017. Value Propositions for Disruptive Technologies: Reconfiguration Tactics in the Case of Electric Vehicles. California Management Review 59 (4): 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R., J. Pinkse, and A. Kolk. 2014. Business Models for Sustainable Technologies: Exploring Business Model Evolution in the Case of Electric Vehicles. Research Policy 43 (2): 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., and F. Lüdeke-Freund. 2013. Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State-of-the-art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, H.2013. Lean Venturing: Learning to Create New Business Through Exploration, Elaboration, Evaluation, Experimentation, and Evolution. International Journal of Innovation Management 17 (3): Article 1340013 (22 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, H., K. Fichter, F. Lüdeke-Freund, and I. Tiemann. 2018. Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Development: Principles, Criteria, and Tools. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 10 (2): 256–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, H., and F. Lüdeke-Freund. 2017a. Values-Based Innovation Management: Innovating by What We Care About. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, H., and F.Lüdeke-Freund.2017b. Values-Based Network and Business Model Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 21 (3): Article 1750028 (35 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Values-Based Business Model Innovation—A Toolkit. In Sustainable Business Models: Principles, Promise, and Practice, ed. L.Moratis, F.Melissen, and S.Idowu. Springer, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroux, S.2017. Patterns for Sustainable Business Model Innovation. Creating a Pattern Taxonomy for Business Model Innovation in the Sustainability Context. Master thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • CB Insights. 2018. The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail. Accessed April 26, 2018. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/startup-failure-reasons-top/.

  • Clinton, L., and R. Whisnant. 2014. Model Behavior—20 Business Model Innovations for Sustainability. London: Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, J. 1999. The Business Pattern: A New Tool for Organizational Knowledge Capture and Reuse. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society for Information Science 36: 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T.2017. Time for New Relationships: Stakeholder Relationship Patterns of Post-Growth Businesses. Master thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., K. Frankenberger, and M. Csik. 2014. The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models That Will Revolutionise Your Business. Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., K. Corley, and A. Hamilton. 2013. Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotra, K., and S. Netessine. 2013. OM Forum—Business Model Innovation for Sustainability. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 15 (4): 537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A. 2016. A Proposal for a Design Approach to More Sustainable Business Models: Tools, Process and Outcomes to Envision the Future of an Organization. Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A., and R.L. Paquin. 2016. The Triple Layered Business Model Canvas: A Tool to Design More Sustainable Business Models. Journal of Cleaner Production 135: 1474–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. 2015. 5 Insights & Predictions on Disruptive Tech from KPMG’s 2015 Global Innovation Survey. Accessed April 28, 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2015/11/08/5-insights-predictions-on-disruptive-tech-from-kpmgs-2015-global-innovation-survey/#224de63a3cbb.

  • Lambert, S. 2015. The Importance of Classification to Business Model Research. Journal of Business Models 3 (1): 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H. 2015. Pattern Theory—Introduction and Perspectives on the Tracks of Christopher Alexander. Graz: HLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., and K. Dembek. 2017. Sustainable Business Model Research and Practice: Emerging Field or Passing Fancy? Journal of Cleaner Production 168: 1668–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., S. Carroux, A. Joyce, L. Massa, and H. Breuer. 2018a. The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustainable Production and Consumption. Online first 26 June 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., S.Gold, and N.Bocken. 2018b. A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, in print. Online first 25 April 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massa, L., C. Tucci, and A. Afuah. 2017. A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research. Academy of Management Annals 11 (1): 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Cross-case Displays: Exploring and Describing. In Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge, M.2017. Thinking Outside the Bin—Sustainable Business Model Patterns for Food Waste Prevention. Master thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2009. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Amsterdam: Self-published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. 2010. Sustainability-driven Entrepreneurship: Principles of Organization Design. Journal of Business Venturing 25 (5): 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, C. 2008. A Modified Delphi Approach to a New Card Sorting Methodology. Journal of Usability Studies 4 (1): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauter, R., J. Jonker, and R.J. Baumgartner. 2017. Going One’s Own Way: Drivers in Developing Business Models for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 140: 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remane, G., A. Hanelt, J. Tesch, and L.M. Kolbe.2017. The Business Model Pattern Database—A Tool for Systematic Business Model Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 21 (1): Article 1750004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. 1992. The Organizational Taxonomy: Definition and Design. Academy of Management Review 17 (4): 758–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., E.G. Hansen, and F. Lüdeke-Freund. 2016. Business Models for Sustainability: Origins, Present Research, and Future Avenues. Organization & Environment 29 (1): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.1969/1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. 2002. Typologies, Taxonomies, and the Benefits of Policy Classification. Policy Studies Journal 30 (3): 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., and C. Cocklin. 2008. Conceptualizing a ‘Sustainability Business Model. Organization & Environment 21 (2): 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A. 2004. Eight Types of Product–Service System: Eight Ways to Sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (4): 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Product Services for a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy—A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 97: 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upward, A., and P. Jones. 2016. An Ontology for Strongly Sustainable Business Models: Defining an Enterprise Framework Compatible with Natural and Social Science. Organization & Environment 29 (1): 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UXBerlin. 2018. Refinement for Business Modelling (Template). Accessed April 26, 2018. http://www.uxberlin.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Values-Based_Business_Modelling_UXBerlin.pdf.

  • Wells, P. 2013. Business Models for Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B.W., A. Pistoia, S. Ullrich, and V. Göttel. 2016. Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives. Long Range Planning 49 (1): 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., S. Evans, D. Vladimirova, and P. Rana. 2017. Value Uncaptured Perspective for Sustainable Business Model Innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 140: 1794–1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., R. Amit, and L. Massa. 2011. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management 37 (4): 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Lüdeke-Freund .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lüdeke-Freund, F., Bohnsack, R., Breuer, H., Massa, L. (2019). Research on Sustainable Business Model Patterns: Status quo, Methodological Issues, and a Research Agenda. In: Aagaard, A. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93275-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics