Skip to main content

Managing Context: Lessons from a Large-Scale Science Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problem Structuring Approaches for the Management of Projects

Abstract

Recent decades have seen repeatedly the high-profile abandonment of ambitious and expensive projects. Sauer (Why Information Systems Fail. Alfred Waller, Henley-on-Thames, 1993) and Flyvbjerg et al. (Megaprojects and Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) argue that the management of large-scale and long-term projects involves the definition and redefinition of success and failure, and the maintenance of financial and political support. To be successful, projects and policies must address both task and institutional orientations. Even if clear criteria are available for identifiable sub-systems, the issue of the effectiveness of any significantly complex system will impinge on a range of potentially conflicting values and interests. To manage these requires the development of narratives convincing to a range of stakeholders. The high energy physics experiments developed at CERN over decades offer insight into the successful long-term management of complex projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tim Berners-Lee celebrating 20 years of WWW at http://info.cern.ch/www20/.

  2. 2.

    The LHC is a collider in which two opposing beams of electrons (hadrons) are brought together within detectors in order to produce collisions which create short lived sub-atomic particles. Four major experimental detectors are located around the 27 km circumference of the LHC.

  3. 3.

    See http://angelsanddemons.cern.ch/.

  4. 4.

    Austria to quit CERN particle physics laboratory

    Fri, May 8 2009, 7:11 AM EDTVIENNA (Reuters) – Austria plans to pull out of the international particle physics laboratory CERN because its share of the high cost is eating up too much of the country’s budget for international research.

    See the response to this statement at

    http://user.web.cern.ch/user/news/2009/090508.html.

    http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=1978.

    http://www.teilchen.at:8080/teilchen/laufend/OneArticle?updatelogo=1;id=208;e=0.

    Austria to stay in particle physics lab after all.

    Mon, May 18 2009, 11:30 AM EDTVIENNA (Reuters) – Austria has changed its mind and will now not pull out of the international particle physics laboratory CERN over the cost, Chancellor Werner Faymann said in a statement on Monday, overruling his science minister.

References

  • Birnholz, J. (2008, Winter). When Authorship Isn’t Enough: Lessons from CERN on the Implications of Formal and Informal Credit Attribution Mechanisms in Collaborative Research. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, F. (2007). The New Cosmic Onion: Quarks and the Nature of the Universe. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge, D. (1982). Critical Decision-Making. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2000). The Springboard: How Story-Telling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, J. E. T., & Crombie, A. D. (1974). A Sociology of Organisations. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in Organizations: Facts Fictions and Fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2008, September 9). Legal Bid to Stop CERN Atom Smasher from ‘Destroying the World’. Daily Telegraph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B. (2003). Europe’s Space Programme: To Ariane and Beyond. London: Springer-Praxis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, C. J., & Hickson, D. J. (1979). A Cross-National and Cross-Institutional Typology of Organisations. In C. J. Lammers & D. J. Hickson (Eds.), Organizations Alike and Unlike: International and Interinstitutional Studies in the Sociology of Organizations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leake, J. (2009, October 18). A Particle God Doesn’t Want Us to Discover. Sunday Times, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, S. E. (1987). The Role of Time-Frames in Design Decision-Making. Design Studies, 8(3), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, S. E. (2004). Design and Determination: The Role of Information Technology in Redressing Regional Inequities in the Development Process. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. S. (1993). Why Information Systems Fail. Henley-on-Thames: Alfred Waller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely, B. J., Denning, S., Groh, K., & Prusak, L. (2005). Storytelling in Organizations: Why Storytelling Is Transforming 21st Century Organizations and Management. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., Schatzman, L., et al. (1973). The Hospital and Its Negotiated Order. In G. Salaman & K. Thompson (Eds.), People and Organisations. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubes, G. (1986). Nobel Dreams Power Deceit and the Ultimate Experiment. Redmond: Tempus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (1971). Exploring the Industrial Subculture. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Little .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Little, S. (2019). Managing Context: Lessons from a Large-Scale Science Project. In: Bell, G., Pagano, R., Warwick, J., Sato, C. (eds) Problem Structuring Approaches for the Management of Projects. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93263-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics