Advertisement

Language, Literacy and Pedagogy

Chapter
  • 559 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of language based pedagogy (LBP) and its theoretical base, drawn linguistically from SFL/G, sociologically from Bernstein’s notion of pedagogic discourse and sociopsychologically from theorists such as Vygotsky. It shows the importance of language for learning generally, and the ways in which teaching grammar and metalanguage can help pupils’ and students develop their apprenticeship into the discursive practices that characterise different subject disciplines. The key argument put forward in the chapter is that recontextualising literacy, particularly across the secondary curriculum, relates to the expression of subject knowledge and the discursive practices that characterise all school subjects, and not simply that of English. Illustrative examples are taken from research into teachers’ practices undertaken in the two secondary schools discussed in more detail in Chapters  4 6.

Keywords

Basic Language Education (LBP) registerRegister Language developmentLanguage Development Dialectdialect Semantic Gravity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, S. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies (pp. 7–15). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. (1975). Class and pedagogies: Visible and invisible. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI).Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, B. (1991). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Vol. 4. Class, codes and control. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, B. (1999). Horizontal and vertical discourse: An essay. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Randi, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finnegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and social change: Papers in the sociology of education. Tavistock: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belkapp Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1991). The teaching-learning cycle. In J. Hamond, A. Burns, & H. Joyce (Eds.), English for social purposes. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
  17. Busch, B. (2012). The linguistic repertoire revisited. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing: A genre based approach. Erskeneville, NSW: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools’ Program.Google Scholar
  19. Carter, R. A. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carter, R. A., & McCarthy, M. J. (2015). Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carter, R. A., & McCarthy, M. J. (2004). Talking, creating: Interactional language, creativity and context. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carter, R. A., McCarthy, M. J., Mark, G., & O’Keefe, A. (2011). English grammar today: An A-Z of spoken and written grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Christie, F. (2002). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. Schleppegrell & M. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages (pp. 45–66). Mahwah, NJ and London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Christie, F. (2007). Ongoing dialogue: Functional language and Bernsteinian sociological perspectives in education. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 3–13). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  26. Christie, F. (2012) Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Chichester, West Sussex and Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  28. Christie, F., & Macken-Horarik, M. (2007). Building vertically in subject English. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistics and sociological perspectives (pp. 14–36). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (2007). Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  30. Clark, U. (2001). War words: Language, history and the disciplining of English. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  31. Clark, U. (2005). Bernstein’s theory of pedagogic discourse: Linguistics, educational policy and practice in the UK English/literacy classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 32–47.Google Scholar
  32. Clark, U. (2010). The problematics of prescribing grammatical knowledge: The case in England. In T. Locke (Ed.), Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom (pp. 120–136). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Clark, U. (2013). Language and identity in Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. (2014). A language as a social-semiotic-based approach to teaching and learning in higher education. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Coupland, N., & Bishop, H. (2007). The ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(1), 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Department of Education and Science. (1988). The Kingman report. Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of English language. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  37. Derewianka, B. (1998). A grammar companion for primary teachers. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  38. De Silva Joyce, H., & Feez, S. (2016). Exploring literacies: Theory, research, practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Elliot, G., Green, S., Constantinou, F., Vitello, S.,Chambers, L., Rushton, N., et al. (2016). Variations in aspects of writing in 16+ examinations between 1980 and 2014. Research matters: A Cambridge assessment publication, Special Issue 4. http://cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/340982-research-matters-special-issue-4-aspects-of-writing-1980-2014.pdf.
  40. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  41. Fontaine, L. (2012). Analysing English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  43. Gardiner, J. (2006). Assessment and Learning. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Gibbons, P. (2002). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  45. Gumperz, J. (1960). Formal and informal standards in the Hindi regional language area (with C. M. Naim). In C. Ferguson & J. Gumperz (Eds.), Linguistic diversity in South Asia. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center.Google Scholar
  46. Gumperz, J. (1964). On the ethnology of linguistic change. In Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference. Los Angeles, CA: Mouton & Company.Google Scholar
  47. Halliday, M. (1977). Text as semantic choice in social context. In T. van Dijk & J. Petofi (Eds.), Grammars and descriptions (pp. 176–225). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  48. Halliday, M. (1983). Spoken and written language. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press (Republished by OUP 1989).Google Scholar
  49. Halliday, M. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  51. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Halliday, M., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Halliday, M., McIntosh, A., & Stevens, P. (2007 [1964]). The users and uses of language. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and society. Volume 10 in the Collected works of M. A. K. Halliday (pp. 5–37). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  54. Hasan, R. (1973). Code, register and social dialect. In B. Bernstein (Ed.), Class, codes and control, Vol. 11: Applied studies towards a sociology of language (pp. 253–292). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  55. Hudson, R. (1992). Teaching grammar: A guide for the national curriculum. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Hudson, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  57. Humphrey, S. (2015). A 4×4 literacy toolkit for employment: English language learners for academic literacies. In M. B. Schaefer (Ed.), Research on teaching and learning with the literacies of young adolescents (pp. 49–72). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Humphrey, S. (2016). Academic literacies in the middle years: A framework for enhancing teacher knowledge and student achievement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (1994). Context-text-grammar: Teaching the genres and grammar of school writing in infant and primary schools. Broadway, NSW: Text productions.Google Scholar
  60. Langacker, R. W. (1983). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and Second language learning. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds). Theories in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  62. Lillis, T. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Martin, J. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Martin, J. (2013). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  66. Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  67. Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2012). Learning to write: Reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Martin, J., & Rothery, J. (1986). Writing Project: Report. Working Papers in Linguistics 4. Sydney: Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  69. Maton, K. (2013). Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory. London and NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Maton, K., & Muller, J. (2007). A sociology for the transmission of knowledges. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 14–33). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  72. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we learn to think together. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mercer, N., & Edwards, D. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen and Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Painter, C. (2005). Learning through language in early childhood. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  76. Pearson, P., & Gallagher, M. (1993). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Raban, B, Clark, U., & McIntyre, J. (1994). Evaluation of the implementation of English in the national Curriculum at key stages 1, 2 and 3 (1991–1993). London: Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/warwick/warwick1994.html.
  78. Rothery, J. (1989). Learning about language. In R. Hasan & J. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 152–198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  79. Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (Eds.). (1997). Exploring experience through story. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 231–263). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  80. Sebba, M. (2012). Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, power and identity. In A. Jaffe, J. Androutsopoulos, M. Sebba, & S. Johnson (Eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, power and identity (pp. 1–20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  81. Snell, J. (2013). Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Language and Education, 27(2), 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessment through the student’s eye. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22–26.Google Scholar
  83. Tienson, J. (1983). Linguistic competence. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. Paper 259. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/259.
  84. Upward, C., & Davidson, G. (2011). The history of English spelling. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Velghe, F., & Blommaert, J. (2014). Emergent new literacies and the mobile phone: Informal languages learning, voice and identity in a South African township. In B. Geraghty & J. Conacher (Eds.), Intercultural contact, language learning and migration (pp. 89–111). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  86. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Plester, B. (2014). Text messaging and its impact on literacy skills: The evidence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations