Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Developing Language and Literacy in English across the Secondary School Curriculum pp 1–36Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Introduction: Language and Literacy Across the Secondary School Curriculum

  • 1004 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a context for the remainder of the project, by providing an overview of initiatives into developing language and literacy in English across the curriculum in England and associated teaching of grammar from the 1960s to the present day. It discusses how developing language and literacy across the curriculum is nothing new, and has long been of concern in education in the UK and beyond. The realisation of the importance of language for learning characterised early work in the field by Barnes et al. (1971) and The Bullock Report of 1975. At the same time, the theoretical underpinnings of what a pedagogic grammar could look like had as yet to be developed, which it now has. It discusses the ideological clashes in relation to the teaching of grammar that characterised the introduction of the national curriculum in the late 1980s through to the present day, and how various whole scale initiatives such as NLS in the 1990s and 2000s failed to impact upon teachers’ imagination and pedagogic practices. Its central argument is, that for any kind of literacy across the curriculum strategy to have any purchase, it has to align with teachers’ day to day affordances across all curriculum subjects in ways that take account of the local as well as the regional and national contexts within which they work, rather than as top down, generic initiative that are imposed upon them.

Keywords

  • Secondary School Curriculum
  • Bullock Report
  • Grammar Instruction
  • Language developmentLanguage Development
  • Schleppegrell

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achugar, M., & Carpenter, B. D. (2012). Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education, 23(3), 262–276.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. (2005). Knowledge about the teaching of [sentence] grammar: The state of play. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews R., Torgerson C., Beverton S., Locke T., Low G., Robinson A., & Zhu D. (2004a). The effect of grammar teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Retrieved December 12, 2005 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/reel.

  • Andrews R., Torgerson C., Beverton S., Locke T., Low G., Robinson A., & Zhu D. (2004b). The effect of grammar teaching (sentence-combining) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Retrieved December 12, 2005 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/reel.

  • Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., et al. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 39–55.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulos, J., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2003). Discourse constructions of youth identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1976/1992). From communication to curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Rosen, M. (1969/1971). Language, the learner and the school. London: Penguin Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1991). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Vol. 4. Class, codes and control. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (Eds.). (2014). Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy. Dordrecht, Heidlelberg, New York and London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2011). Repertoires revisited: ‘Knowing language’ in superdiversity. London: Kings College Working Papers in Language and Literacies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and social change: Papers in the sociology of education. Tavistock: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education society and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, S., Kehily, M. J., & Buckingham, D. (Eds.). (2014). Youth cultures in the age of global media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisk, M. (2015). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre based pedagogy for K-5 classrooms. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F., Gray, P., Gray, B., Macken, M., Martin, J. R. & Rothery, J. (1990a, 1990b, 1992). Language a resource for meaning: Procedures. Books 1–4 and Teachers Manual; Reports Books 104 and Teachers’ Manual; Explanations Books 1–4 and Teachers’ Manual. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, U. (1994). Bringing English to order. English in Education, 28(1), 33–38.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, U. (2001). War words: Language, history and the disciplining of English. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, U. (2005). Bernstein’s theory of pedagogic discourse: Linguistics, educational policy and practice in the UK English/literacy classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, U. (2013). Language and identity in Englishes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. London: Hienemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbett, W. (1818). A grammar of the English language. New York: Peter Eckler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, C. (1996). Exploring literacy in school history. Sydney: Disadvantaged Schools Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. (2014). A language as a social-semiotic-based approach to teaching and learning in higher education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, K., & Lobeck, A. (Eds.). (2010). Linguistics at school: Language awareness in primary and secondary education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (DES). (1975). The Bullock Report. A Language for Life. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1988). The Kingman Report. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Rozelle, NSW: Primary English Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Silva Joyce, H., & Feez, S. (2016). Exploring literacies: Theory, research, practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. (1991). A schooling in English. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeke, B., & Breen, L. (2013). Beginning again: A response to Rosen and Christie. Changing English; Studies in Culture and Education, 20(3), 292–305.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, P., Pearce, J., & Thornton, G. (1971). Language in use. London: Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, V., & Briggs, J. (2011). Teacher education and applied linguistics: What needs to be understood about what, how and where beginning teachers learn. In S. Ellis & E. McCartney (Eds.), Applied linguistics and primary school teaching (pp. 276–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, A. (1994). ‘Do as I say’: The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 191–210). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R. (2012). Learning the grammatics of quoted speech: Benefits for punctuation and expressive reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 206–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartland, L., & Smolkin, L. (2016). The histories and mysteries of grammar instruction. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 391–399.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2012). The old and the new in the new digital literacies. Education Forum, 76(4), 418–420.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2014). Decontextualised language: A problem, not a solution. International Multilingual Research, 8(1), 9–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Georgakopoulou, A. (2014). ‘Girlpower or girl (in) trouble?’ Identities and discourses in the (new) media engagement of adolescents’ school-based interaction. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 428–455). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli, M., & Clayton, D. (Eds.). (2016). Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwyn, A., & Fuller, C. (2011). The great literacy debate. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools—A report to Carnegie corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1991). Linguistic perspectives on literacy: A systemic-functional approach. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the Inaugural Australian Systemic Linguistics Conference. Centre for Studies of Language in Education, Darwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 339–376). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamond, J. (Ed.). (2001). Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, M., & Macken-Horarik, M. (2015). Linguistically informed teaching of spelling: Toward a relational approach. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38(2), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R., & Walmsley, J. (2005). The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics, 41(3), 593–622.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. (1996). Exploring literacy in school geography. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. (2016). Academic literacies in the middle years: A framework for enhancing teacher knowledge and student achievement. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L. (2015). Functional language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle years. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 252–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O Hallora, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, M. (2016). Literacy and multimodality across different global sites. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). A New Literacies Sampler. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge Falmer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T. (Ed.). (2010). Beyond the grammar wars: A resource book for developing teachers and students language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2008). Multiliteracies and ‘basic skills’ accountability. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), New literacties and the English curriculum: Multimodal perspectives (pp. 283–308). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2011). Why schools English needs a ‘good enough’ grammatics (and not more grammar). Changing English: Studies in culture and education, 19(2), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., & Horarik, S. (2018). Rethinking grammar in language arts: Insights from an Australian survey of teachers’ subject knowledge. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(3), 288–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarick, M., Sandiford, C., Love, K., & Unsworth, L. (2015). New ways of working ‘with grammar in mind’ in school English: Insights from systemic functional grammatics. Linguistics and Education, 31, 145–158.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J., Merchant, G., Gillen, J., & Davies, J. (2012). Virtual literacies: Interactive spaces for children and young people. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2013). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24, 23–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maune, M., & Klassen, M. (2014). Filling in the gaps: Genre as a scaffold to the text types of the Common Core State Standards. In L. C. Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts. Sheffield and Bristol, CT: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybin, J. (2014). Researching children’s language and literacy practices in school. In C. McAlister & S. Ellis (Eds.), Genre pedagogy and literacy across learning. Paper presented at SERA Annual Conference 2014, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D. (2018). Grammar as a meaning-making resource for improving writing. LI. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D., & Watson, A. (2013a). Creating a language-rich classroom. In S. Capel, M. Leask, & T. Turner (Eds.), Learning to teach in the secondary school: A companion to school experience (pp. 403–413). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D., & Watson, A. (2013b). Grammar matters: How teachers’ grammatical knowledge impacts on the teaching of writing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 77–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D., & Watson, A. (2014). The role of grammar in the writing curriculum: A review. Journal of Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(1), 41–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers Education, 27(2), 139–166.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nesi, H., & Gardener, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Students writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2009). English at the crossroads: An evaluation of English in primary and secondary schools 2005/8. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2012). Moving English forward. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, L. C., & Iddings, J. (2014). Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts. Sheffield and Bristol, CT: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Roswell, J. (2012). Literacy and education: The new literacy studies in the classroom (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, C., Martin, J. R., & Unsworth, L. (2013). Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, B., Burnett, C., & Marchant, G. (Eds.). (2016). Literacy, media, technology: Past, present and future. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polias, J., & Dare, B. (2006). Towards a pedagogic grammar. In R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, & A. McCabe (Eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. (2004). Talking with Jess: Looking at how metalanguage assisted explanation writing in the middle years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, B., Clark, U., & McIntyre, J. (1994). Evaluation of the implementation of English in the national curriculum at key stages 1, 2 and 3 (1991–1993). London: Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/warwick/warwick1994.html.

  • Rose, D., Gray, B., & Cowey, W., (1999). Scaffolding reading and writing for indigenous children in school. In P. Wignell (Ed.), Double power: English literacy in indigenous schooling (pp. 23–60). Melbourne: NLLIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. (2013). How genre theory saved the world. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 20(1), 3–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rothery, J. (1994). Exploring literacy in school English (write it right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63, 153–170.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M., Greer, S., & Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 174–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L., & Thomas, A. (Eds.). (2014). English teaching and new literacies pedagogy: Interpreting and authoring digital multimedia narratives. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L., & Macken-Horarik, M. (2015). Interpretive responses to images in picture books by primary and secondary school students: Exploring curriculum expectations of a ‘visual grammatics’. English in Education, 49(1), 56–79.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (2015). The problem of grammar teaching: A case study of the relationship between a teacher’s beliefs and pedagogical practice. Language and Education, 29(4), 332–346.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1998). Children entering literate worlds: Perspectives from the study of textual practice. In F. Christie & R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 18–46). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2000). Children’s literature, children and uses of language description. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: A functional perspective (pp. 111–129). London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2004). Ontogenesis and grammatics: Functions of metalanguage in pedagogic discourse. In G. Williams & A. Lukin (Eds.), The development of language (pp. 241–267). London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, D. (2017). How writing works: From the invention of the alphabet to the rise of social media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, D., Jones, R., Bradford, H., & Anne, W. M. (2013). Teaching English language and literacy (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Urszula Clark

Authors
  1. Urszula Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urszula Clark .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clark, U. (2019). Introduction: Language and Literacy Across the Secondary School Curriculum. In: Developing Language and Literacy in English across the Secondary School Curriculum . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93239-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93239-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93238-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93239-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

search

Navigation