Skip to main content

The Ethics of Care as Applied to Physiotherapy Training and Practice – A South African Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 13))

Abstract

Many philosophical approaches can be brought to the solving of ethical dilemmas in the healthcare professional arena, but in this chapter, we suggest that care ethics or the ethic of care might be the most appropriate within the context of physiotherapy.

The aims of this chapter are the following:

  1. (a)

    Introduce readers to the concepts of the ethics of care or “care ethics”. This includes a brief description of the history, principles and criticisms that have been levelled against care ethics.

  2. (b)

    Discuss how care ethics is relevant to the ethical issues in physiotherapy training and clinical practice, with an emphasis on the South African situation.

  3. (c)

    Present a case study that demonstrates how care ethics might inform ethical decision making in the clinical setting.

The first section of the chapter focuses on the principles of care ethics, history and criticisms. The second section of the chapter focuses on ethical issues in physiotherapy training and practice in South Africa. This includes a discussion of the imperative to train physiotherapists who are fit for the purpose, i.e. able to provide accessible, effective and culturally appropriate care to all South Africans. The final section of the chapter focuses on a case study of an ethical dilemma in clinical practice, with discussion of how care ethics can inform decision making. The “web of care” in this case includes consideration of the community service (junior) physiotherapist, the patient, their caregivers or families, the physiotherapist’s colleagues and lecturers, as well as the wider community from which all are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berghs, M. 2017. Practices and discourses of Ubuntu: Implications for an African model of disability? African Journal of Disability 6: 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, E. 2016. Towards the next phase of Ubuntu – Andries Baart. Retrieved on August 21, 2017 from https://ethicsofcare.org/towards-the-next-phase-of-ubuntu/.

  • Breslin, J.M., S.K. MacRae, J. Bell, and P.A. Singer. 2005. Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: Views of Toronto bioethicists. BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byszewski, A., W. Hendelman, C. McGuinty, and G. Moineau. 2012. Wanted: Role models – Medical students’ perceptions of professionalism. BMC Medical Education 12 (1): 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A., D. Callahan, and J. Haas. 1987. Ethical and policy issues in rehabilitation medicine. Hastings Center Report 17 (4): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N., and J. Sabin. 2002. Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health South Africa. 2009. White paper for the transformation of the health system in South Africa 1997. Retrieved on October 11, 2017 from http://www.docs/policy/white_paper/healthsys97_01.html.

  • Elliott, A. 2001. Health care ethics: Cultural relativity of autonomy. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 12 (4): 326–330. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0456/984643f3252fe863a53da03f380c6811a349.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastmans, C. 2006. The care perspective in health care ethics. In Essentials of teaching and learning in nursing ethics, ed. A. Davis, V. Tschudin, and L. De Raeve, 135–148. London: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, K., C. Stocking, L. Wagner, S. Foye, and M. Siegler. 2001. Ethical issues identified by rehabilitation clinicians. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82 (Suppl 2): S2–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, V.D. 2012. Applying the ethics of care to your nursing practice. Medsurg Nursing 21 (2): 112–114. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, Q. 2016. Allied health clinical practice guidelines in South African primary healthcare settings. Sage Matters, Sept 2016. Pretoria: MRC SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayosi, B.M., and S.R. Benatar. 2014. Health and health care in South Africa – 20 years after Mandela. New England Journal of Medicine 371 (14): 1344–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C., T. Vos, R. Lozano, M. Naghavi, A. Flaxman, C. Michaud, et al. 2012. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions 1990–2010. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. The Lancet 380 (9859): 2197–2223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nortjé, N., and J. De Jongh. 2017. Professionalism – A case for medical education to honour the societal contract. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy 47 (2): 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, L., and C. Ennis. 2005. The ethic of care in teaching: An overview of supportive literature. Quest 57: 392–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram-Tiktin, E. 2011. A decent minimum for everyone as a sufficiency of basic human functional capabilities. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7): 24–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen, S. 1998. Citizenship and the ethics of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, F., and A. Niemeijer. 2017. Rethinking critical reflection on care: Late modern uncertainty and the implications for care ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9766-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2001. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Edwards, S.D. 2011. Is there a distinctive care ethics? Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa Burgess .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burgess, T., Jelsma, J. (2018). The Ethics of Care as Applied to Physiotherapy Training and Practice – A South African Perspective. In: Nortjé, N., De Jongh, JC., Hoffmann, W. (eds) African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93230-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics