Multiple-Partner Fertility: Variation Across Measurement Approaches

  • J. Bart StykesEmail author
  • Karen Benjamin Guzzo
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 47)


Contemporary US families are characterized by high levels of complexity but measuring complexity, such as multiple-partner fertility (MPF), can be difficult. Scholars generally use indirect methods rather than direct items to measure MPF due to data limitations. The redesigned 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) and the 2011–2015 Cycle of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) provide a unique opportunity to evaluate different measurement approaches. We document variation in prevalence estimates of MPF among women aged 15–44 across approaches and datasets. Overall, our findings suggest that 20–25% of mothers experience MPF. Direct measures of MPF produce lower prevalence estimates compared to semi-direct and indirect approaches, pointing to the possibility of social desirability bias. Moreover, direct measures seem to perform particularly poorly for less advantaged women. Further, variation in identifying MPF has implications for its association with other behaviors and outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of these findings and make recommendations for future data collection and research endeavors.


  1. Bronte-Tinkew, J., Horowitz, A., & Scott, M. E. (2009). Fathering with multiple partners: Links to children’s well-being in early childhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 608–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. R. (2011). Who owes what to whom? Child support policy given multiple-partner fertility. Social Service Review, 85(4), 587–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson, M. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban U.S. parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 718–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson, M. J., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41(2), 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Census. (2016). Survey of income and program participation: 2014 panel user’s guide (1st ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Economic and Statistics Administration.Google Scholar
  6. Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherlin, A. J. (2014). Labor’s love lost: The rise and fall of the working-class family in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Dorius, C. (2012). Does MPF put women at risk? Theories of multipartnered fertility and health. PSC Research Report 12–770. Population Studies Center, University of Michigan. Retrieved from
  9. Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Social Problems, 47(1), 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Evenhouse, E., & Reilly, S. (2012). Multiple-father families and welfare. Journal of Family Issues, 33(7), 966–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fomby, P. (2018). Motherhood in complex families. Journal of Family Issues, 39(1), 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fomby, P., & Cherlin, A. J. (2007). Family instability and child well-being. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fomby, P., & Osborne, C. (2017). Family instability, multipartner fertility, and behavior in middle childhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Furstenberg, F. F. (2014). Fifty years of family change: From consensus to complexity. The ANNALS of the American Academic of Political and Social Science, 654(1), 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2009). Money, marriage and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2011). Mothers but not wives: The increasing lag between nonmarital births and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2014). Magic moment? maternal marriage for children born out of wedlock. Demography, 51(4), 1345–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grall, T. S. (2013). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2011 (pp. 60–246). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  20. Guzzo, K. B. (2014). New partners, more kids: Multiple-partner fertility in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654(66), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guzzo, K. B. (2017). A research note on the stability of unions formed post-conception. 2017 Working Paper Series. Center for Family and Demographic Research: Bowling Green State University. Retrieved from
  22. Guzzo, K. B., & Dorius, C. (2016). Challenges in measuring and studying multipartnered fertility in American survey data. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(4), 553–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guzzo, K. B., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2007). Multipartnered fertility among young women with a nonmarital first birth: Prevalence and risk factors. Perspective on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halpern-Meekin, S., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2013). Relationship churning in emerging adulthood: On/off relationships and sex with an ex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(2), 166–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayford, S. R., Guzzo, K. B., & Smock, P. J. (2014). The decoupling of marriage and parenthood? Trends in the timing of marital first births, 1945–2002. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 520–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joyner, K., Elizabeth Peters, H., Hynes, K., Sikora, A., Tabor, J. R., & Rendall, M. S. (2012). The quality of male fertility data in major U.S. surveys. Demography, 49(1), 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klerman, L. V. (2007). Multipartnered fertility: Can it be reduced? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(1), 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, D., & McLanahan, S. (2015). Family structure transitions and child development: Instability, selection, and population heterogeneity. American Sociological Review, 80(4), 738–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Bart Stykes, J. (2014). Family complexity among children in the United States. TheANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654(1), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are raring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McLanahan, S. (2009). Fragile families and the reproduction of poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621(1), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLanahan, S., & Beck, A. N. (2010). Parental relationships in fragile families. The Future of Children, 20(2), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer, D. R., & Cancian, M. (2012). I’m not supporting his kids: Nonresident fathers’ contributions given mothers’ new fertility. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 132–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, D. R., Cancian, M., & Cook, S. T. (2005). Multiple-partner fertility: Incidence and implications for child support policy. Social Service Review, 79(4), 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Monte, L. M. (2007). Blended but not the Bradys: Navigating unmarried multiple partner fertility. Ch. 8. In P. England & K. Edin (Eds.), Unmarried couples with children (pp. 183–203). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Monte, L. M. (2017). Multiple partner fertility research brief. Current Population Reports: U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Pessin, L. (2018). Changing gender norms and marriage dynamics in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schoen, R. (2010). Gender competition and family change. GENUS: Journal of Population Sciences, 66(2), 65–120.Google Scholar
  39. Stewart, S. D. (2007). Brave new stepfamilies: Diverse paths toward stepfamily living. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family changes: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turney, K., & Carlson, M. J. (2011). Multipartnered fertility and depression among fragile families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(3), 570–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu, L. L. (2008). Cohort estimates of nonmarital fertility for U.S. women. Demography, 45(1), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zobl, S. L, & Smock, P. J. (2015). Multiple partner fertility among white married couples in the US, 1955. (FP-15-02). National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologySam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations