Abstract
Online groups are diverse online places and platforms where people with common interests or goals meet and share information, materials, or support. The chapter focuses on online groups oriented toward eating behaviors and describes the diversity of eating-oriented online groups that are connected through digital technology. The diverse factors defining the character of the online group are depicted, including type of online platforms used for interaction, size of group, prevailing ties among members, and sense of online community. Then, specific focus is given to the differentiation between eating-oriented online groups according to their goals and topics, which also delineate membership within such groups. In this regard, attention is given to online groups that provide safe places for members who struggle with stigmatization. The chapter shows how these factors are connected with different norms, values, or discourses within the online group. These may be beneficial, for instance, if they reinforce and motivate users in healthy eating habits, but they can be also risky, if they advocate unhealthy types of eating behaviors. The chapter then reviews the literature related to selected social processes within online groups, specifically social comparison, social influence of the group, and the role of the social support provided by the group. The social comparison is discussed with regard to the diversity of the content available in online groups, such as “thinspiration” content. Social influence is discussed in relation to both informational and normative forms of influence, which are linked with previous depictions of norms and information within differently oriented online groups. Finally, Optimal Matching Theory is used to describe the social support, especially with regard to the potential of online groups to offer emotional support. The beneficial and risky outcomes of diverse eating-oriented online groups are illustrated, with specific focus on online groups for overweight or obese people and those suffering from eating disorders. It is depicted how online groups may facilitate empowerment and motivate eating-related efforts—a process which can, however, be connected with reinforcement of harmful perspectives and practices, such as drastic dieting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arigo, D. (2015). Promoting physical activity among women using wearable technology and online social connectivity: A feasibility study. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 3(1), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2015.1118350
Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, K. H. (2002). Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090121
Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1867–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004
Baron, R. A., Byrne, D. E., & Branscombe, N. R. (2007). Mastering social psychology. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Bartlett, Y. K., & Coulson, N. S. (2011). An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 83(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.029
Beaudoin, C. E., & Tao, C. C. (2007). Benefiting from social capital in online support groups: An empirical study of cancer patients. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 587–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9986
Blanchard, A. L. (2007). Developing a sense of virtual community measure. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 827–830. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9946
Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced sense of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968470
Borzekowski, D. L., Schenk, S., Wilson, J. L., & Peebles, R. (2010). e-Ana and e-Mia: A content analysis of pro–eating disorder web sites. American Journal of Public Health, 100(8), 1526–1534. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.172700
Brotsky, S. R., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
Coulson, N. S., Buchanan, H., & Aubeeluck, A. (2007). Social support in cyberspace: A content analysis of communication within a Huntington’s disease online support group. Patient Education and Counseling, 68(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002
Cranwell, J., & Seymour-Smith, S. (2012). Monitoring and normalising a lack of appetite and weight loss. A discursive analysis of an online support group for bariatric surgery. Appetite, 58(3), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.029
Csipke, E., & Horne, O. (2007). Pro-eating disorder websites: Users’ opinions. European Eating Disorders Review, 15(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.789
Cutrona, C. E. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.3
Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Wiley series on personality processes. Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). Oxford, England: Wiley.
Das, A., & Faxvaag, A. (2014). What influences patient participation in an online forum for weight loss surgery? A qualitative case study. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 3(1), e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2847
De Brún, A., McCarthy, M., McKenzie, K., & McGloin, A. (2014). Weight stigma and narrative resistance evident in online discussions of obesity. Appetite, 72, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.022
Dickins, M., Browning, C., Feldman, S., & Thomas, S. (2016). Social inclusion and the Fatosphere: The role of an online weblogging community in fostering social inclusion. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12397
Dickins, M., Thomas, S. L., King, B., Lewis, S., & Holland, K. (2011). The role of the fatosphere in fat adults’ responses to obesity stigma: A model of empowerment without a focus on weight loss. Qualitative Health Research, 21(12), 1679–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311417728
Eichhorn, K. C. (2008). Soliciting and providing social support over the Internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01431.x
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ, 328(7449), 1166. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166
Fernback, J. (2007). Beyond the diluted community concept: A symbolic interactionist perspective on online social relations. New Media & Society, 9(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072417
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117–140.
Fox, N., & Ward, K. (2008a). Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite, 50(2–3), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Fox, N., & Ward, K. J. (2008b). You are what you eat? Vegetarianism, health and identity. Social Science & Medicine, 66(12), 2585–2595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.011
Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<963::AID-EJSP905>3.0.CO;2-S
Gavin, J., Rodham, K., & Poyer, H. (2008). The presentation of “pro-anorexia” in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307311640
Giles, D. C. (2006). Constructing identities in cyberspace: The case of eating disorders. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X53596
Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Social networks: A developing paradigm (pp. 347–367). New York, NY: Academic.
Greene, J., Sacks, R., Piniewski, B., Kil, D., & Hahn, J. S. (2013). The impact of an online social network with wireless monitoring devices on physical activity and weight loss. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 4(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131912469546
Gurak, L. J., & Antonijevic, S. (2008). The psychology of blogging: You, me, and everyone in between. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208321341
Harper, F. M., Li, S. X., Chen, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2007, April). Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community. In International Conference on persuasive technology (pp. 148–159). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Howard, M. C., & Magee, S. M. (2013). To boldly go where no group has gone before: An analysis of online group identity and validation of a measure. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 2058–2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.009
Hwang, K. O., Ottenbacher, A. J., Green, A. P., Cannon-Diehl, M. R., Richardson, O., Bernstam, E. V., & Thomas, E. J. (2010). Social support in an Internet weight loss community. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.10.003
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871
Juarascio, A. S., Shoaib, A., & Timko, C. A. (2010). Pro-eating disorder communities on social networking sites: A content analysis. Eating Disorders, 18(5), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2010.511918
Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266996
Kelman, H. C. (1974). Social influence and linkages between the individual and the social system: Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization. In J. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power (pp. 125–171). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Klemm, P., Bunnell, D., Cullen, M., Soneji, R., Gibbons, P., & Holecek, A. (2003). Online cancer support groups: A review of the research literature. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21(3), 136–142.
Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 75–93.
Lewis, S., Thomas, S. L., Blood, R. W., Castle, D., Hyde, J., & Komesaroff, P. A. (2011). ‘I’m searching for solutions’: Why are obese individuals turning to the internet for help and support with ‘being fat’? Health Expectations, 14(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00644.x
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.223
McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681
McKenna, K. Y., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2699.6.1.116
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
McNamara, N., & Parsons, H. (2016). ‘Everyone here wants everyone else to get better’: The role of social identity in eating disorder recovery. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12161
Morgan, P. J., Lubans, D. R., Collins, C. E., Warren, J. M., & Callister, R. (2011). 12-month outcomes and process evaluation of the SHED-IT RCT: An internet-based weight loss program targeting men. Obesity, 19(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.119
Mulveen, R., & Hepworth, J. (2006). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of participation in a pro-anorexia internet site and its relationship with disordered eating. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105306061187
Nakhasi, A., Shen, A. X., Passarella, R. J., Appel, L. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2014). Online social networks that connect users to physical activity partners: A review and descriptive analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6), e153. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2674
Peebles, R., Wilson, J. L., Litt, I. F., Hardy, K. K., Lock, J. D., Mann, J. R., & Borzekowski, D. L. (2012). Disordered eating in a digital age: Eating behaviors, health, and quality of life in users of websites with pro-eating disorder content. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), e148.
Reifegerste, D., Wasgien, K., & Hagen, L. M. (2017). Online social support for obese adults: Exploring the role of forum activity. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 101, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.003
Smith, M. A., & Kollock, P. (Eds.). (1999). Communities in cyberspace. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sneijder, P., & Te Molder, H. (2009). Normalizing ideological food choice and eating practices. Identity work in online discussions on veganism. Appetite, 52(3), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.012
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7
Taiminen, H. (2016). How do online communities matter? Comparison between active and non-active participants in an online behavioral weight loss program. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.002
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations (Vol. 7). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. H. (1985). Social support measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00905728
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 399–418). London, UK: Sage.
Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02879.x
Watson, N. (1997). Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the phish.Net fan community. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 102–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Webber, K. H., Tate, D. F., & Quintiliani, L. M. (2008). Motivational interviewing in internet groups: A pilot study for weight loss. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(6), 1029–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.005
Welbourne, J. L., Blanchard, A. L., & Wadsworth, M. B. (2013). Motivations in virtual health communities and their relationship to community, connectedness and stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.024
Wentzer, H. S., & Bygholm, A. (2013). Narratives of empowerment and compliance: Studies of communication in online patient support groups. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(12), e386–e394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.008
Williams, J. P. (2009). Community, frame of reference, and boundary: Three sociological concepts and their relevance for virtual worlds research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 5(2), 3–16.
Wilson, J. L., Peebles, R., Hardy, K. K., & Litt, I. F. (2006). Surfing for thinness: A pilot study of pro–eating disorder web site usage in adolescents with eating disorders. Pediatrics, 118(6), e1635–e1643. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1133
Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00313.x
Yuan, E. J. (2013). A culturalist critique of ‘online community’ in new media studies. New Media & Society, 15(5), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462847
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Šmahel, D., Macháčková, H., Šmahelová, M., Čevelíček, M., Almenara, C.A., Holubčíková, J. (2018). Eating-Oriented Online Groups. In: Digital Technology, Eating Behaviors, and Eating Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93221-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93221-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93220-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93221-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)