Abstract
Precast concrete frame systems are widely preferred for the single storey industrial buildings in Turkey and Europe due to its rapid and economical construction practice. Field investigations after past major earthquakes revealed that the damage in such structures was primarily due to the improper detailing in beam–column connections and lack of required lateral stiffness. In this study, two different precast industrial buildings, damaged during the 1999 Marmara earthquake, were numerically investigated. The seismic performances of the buildings were evaluated by using Incremental Equivalent Seismic Load Method and strain-based damage definitions as recommended in Turkish Earthquake Code. The analytical results obtained from performance evaluations are compared with the findings from the field investigations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arslan MH, Korkmaz HH, Gulay FG (2006) Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the Turkish Earthquake code. Eng Fail Anal 13(4):537–557
ATC-40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California
Belleri A, Torquati M, Riva P, Nascimbene R (2015) Vulnerability assessment and retrofit solutions of precast industrial structures. Earthquakes and structures 8(3):801–820
Bozdag O, Duzgun M (2010) Mevcut Prefabrike Bir Binanın Deprem Performansının Artımsal İtme Analizi Yöntemleri ile Belirlenmesi. Beton Prefabrikasyon 93:5–13 (in Turkish)
Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI) SAP2000: Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures. Berkeley, California
Ercolino M, Magliulo G, Manfredi G (2016) Failure of a precast RC building due to Emilia-Romagna earthquakes. Eng Struct 118:262–273
Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
FEMA (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Ghosh SK, Cleland N (2012) Observations from the February 27, 2010, earthquake in Chile. PCI J 57(1):52–75
Iverson JK, Hawkins NM (1994) Performance of precast/prestressed concrete building structures during Northridge Earthquake. PCI J 39:38–56
Khare RK, Maniyar MM, Uma SR, Bidwai VB (2011) Seismic performance and design of precast concrete building structures: an overview. J Struct Eng 38(3):272–284
Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20:452–464
Magliulo G, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2008) Seismic assessment of existing precast industrial buildings using static and dynamic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 30(9):2580–2588
Mainstone RJ (1971) On the stiffness and strength of infilled frames. In: Proceedings of the institute of civil engineers, Supplemental vol IV, pp 57–90
Mainstone RJ, Weeks GA (1972) The influence of bounding frame on the racking stiffness and strength of brick walls. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on brick masonry, UK, 1972
Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Div 114(8):1804–182
Muguruma H, Nishiyama M, Watanabe F (1995) Lessons learned from the Kobe earthquake—a Japanese perspective. PCI J 40:28–42
Ozden S, Meydanli HM (2003) Seismic response of pre-cast industrial buildings during 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. SE-40EEE, Skopje earthquake: 40 years of European Earthquake Engineering, Skopje, Macedonia, 2003
Ozden S, Akpinar E, Erdogan H, Atalay HM (2014) Performance of precast concrete structures in October 2011 Van earthquake Turkey. Mag Concr Res 66(11):543–552
Ozturk, B, Demiralan F (2007) Investigation of seismic behavior of a prefabricated building located at a seismically active region using various ground motion records. In: Sixth national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey
Poland CD, Hom DB (1997) Opportunities and pitfalls of performance based seismic engineering. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, Slovenia
Posada M, Wood SL (2002) Seismic performance of precast industrial buildings in Turkey. In: 7th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, Boston
Senel SM, Palanci M (2013) Structural aspects and seismic performance of 1-story precast buildings in Turkey. J Performance of Constructed Facilities 27(4):437–449
TEC (1975) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas (Turkish Earthquake Code 1975). Ministry of public works and settlement, government of republic of Turkey, Ankara
TEC (2007) Specifications for buildings to be built in seismic areas (Turkish Earthquake Code 2007). Ministry of Public works and settlement, government of republic of Turkey, Ankara
XTRACT (2007) Cross section analysis program for structural engineers. Imbsen and Associates Inc., USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seckin, A., Atalay, H.M., Erdogan, H., Doran, B., Akbas, B. (2019). Strain-Based Seismic Performance Evaluation of Prefabricated Structures. In: Kasimzade, A., Şafak, E., Ventura, C., Naeim, F., Mukai, Y. (eds) Seismic Isolation, Structural Health Monitoring, and Performance Based Seismic Design in Earthquake Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93157-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93157-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93156-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93157-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)