Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Operations Management ((BRIEFSOPERMAN))

  • 978 Accesses

Abstract

In today’s highly dynamic and rapidly changing environment, the global competition among organizations has led to higher demands on the manufacturing organizations. The manufacturing industry has experienced an unprecedented degree of change in the last three decades, involving drastic changes in management approaches, product and process technologies, customer expectations, supplier attitudes, as well as competitive behavior. These challenges are forcing the manufacturing organizations globally to foster high reliability, availability, and maintainability in the manufacturing systems by implementation of various strategic and proactive market-driven strategies to remain competitive in a highly dynamic environment (Ahuja & Khamba, 2008). With increased competition, attention has been focused on improving efficiency of manufacturing operations to meeting market conditions in terms of delivery, cost, and quality (Yamashina, 1995). To meet the continuously changing environment, satisfy customer, and retain market share, incremental improvements of manufacturing system processes have become necessary (Shingeo, 1988). It includes collection of activities aiming at simplifying production processes through elimination of different types of waste (Terziovski, 2002). It is based on making incremental innovation supported by different types of practices (Malik, Li-bin, YeZhuang, & Xiao-lin, 2007). Companies are therefore applying continuous improvement practices to enhance their systems and operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdolshah, M., & Jahan, A. (2006). How to use continuous improvement tools in different life periods of organization. International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology 2, 772–777, Singapore: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M., Componation, P., Czarnecki, H., & Schroer, B. J. (1999). Simulation as a tool for continuous process improvement. Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, USA, 1, 766–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S., Hassan, M. H., & Fen, Y. H. (2005). Performance measurement and evaluation in an innovative modern manufacturing system. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(2), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, I. P. S., & Khamba, J. S. (2008). Total productive maintenance: Literature review and direction. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25(7), 709–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J. (2000).Creating and maintaining high involvement innovation. Seminar on kaizen from understanding to action, 30 March, Institute of Electrical Engineers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Caffyn, S., & Gallagher, M. (2001). An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behavior. Technovation, 21(2), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., & Francis, D. (1999). Developing continuous improvement capability. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(11), 1106–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, M., & Heap, J. (2002). The myth of continuous improvement. Work Study, 51(6), 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. C. (1999). The role of performance measurement in continuous improvement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(12), 1318–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, A. P., & New, S. (2003). Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(12), 1426–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2000). Choosing the right tool from the tool box-some examples of Gemba Kaizen practice. IEE Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), London, 6, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrborty, A., Bhattacharya, M., Ghosh, S., & Sarkar, G. (2013). Importance of KAIZEN concept in medium manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Management and Strategy, 4(6), 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, M., Kannan, S., & Pandiaraj, P. (2008). Quality improvement in automobile assembly production line by using Kaizen. Manufacturing Technology Today, 7(3), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. (1995). Core threads of continuous improvement. Management Development Review, 8(4), 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. L., & Hyland, P. W. (1997). Continuous improvement strategies across selected manufacturing sector. Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 4(3), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. I., & Wu, C. W. (2004). A new focus on overcoming the improvement failure. Technovation, 24, 585–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E., & Dale, B. G. (1995). Organization of continuous improvement: An examination. The TQM Magazine, 7(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghan, R., Zohrab, M., Momeni, A., & Hoseini, M. (2006). Continuous improvement approach in the agriculture sector. Asian Pacific Productivity Conference, Seoul National University, South Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhongade, P. M., Singh, M., & Stouty, V. A. (2013). A review: Literature survey for the Implementation of Kaizen. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 3(1), 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, R. F., Noblett, M. J., & Phelps, J. A. (1998). Impact of poka-yoke device on job performance of individuals with cognitive impairments. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6(3), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. A., VanAken, E. M., Doolen, T. L., & June, W. (2009). Critical success factor human resource outcome in Kaizen event: An Empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(1), 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Lorenzo, A., Prado, J., & Arca, J. G. (2000). Continuous improvement and employee participation in SMEs. The TQM Magazine, 12(4), 290–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., & Davies, L. (1990). In pursuit of frameworks for the development of growth models of the small business. International Small Business Journal, 9(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves, G. C. (2002). Business process management: Integration of quality management and reengineering for enhanced competitiveness. Pro Quest Information and Learning Company, 7(1), 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granja, D. A., Picchi, F. A., & Robert, G. T. (2005). Target and Kaizen costing in construction. Proceedings IGLC-13, Sydney, Australia, pp. 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunberg, T. (2003). A review of improvement methods in manufacturing operations. Work Study, 52(2), 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongming, H., Sun, H., & Xu, Y. (2000). An empirical study on quality management practices in Shinghai manufacturing industries. Total Quality Management, 11(8), 1111–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, P., Mellor, R., Omara, E., & Kondepndi, R. (2000). A comparison of Australian firms and their use of continuous improvement tools. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionica, A. C., Leba, M., & Corbu, C. (2013). Professional Development—Between Reengineering and Continuous Improvement. 2nd World Conference on Educational Technology ResearchesWCETR2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irane, Z., & Sharp, J. M. (1997). Integrating continuous improvement and innovation into a corporate culture: a case study. Technovation, 17(4), 225–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaca, C., Viles, E., Mateo, R., & Santos, J. (2012). Components of sustainable improvement systems: theory and practices. The TQM Journal, 24(2), 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jager, B., Minnie, C., Jager, J., Welgemoed, M., Bessant, J., & Francis, D. (2004). Enabling continuous improvement: a case study of implementation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(4), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S., Michela, J., & Noori, H. (1999). Within the Canadian boundaries: A close look at Canadian Industries implementing continuous improvement. The TQM Magazine, 11(3), 188–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsdottir, S., Ingason, H. I., & Jonasson, H. I. (2014). Continuous improvement projects in certified organizations in Iceland: traditional projects or not? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. Y., Wang, Y. J., & Wu, S. (2009). Competitive strategy, TQM practice, and Continuous Improvement of international project management. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26(2), 164–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaskhedikar, K., & Katore, H. V. (2013). Improvement of quality and productivity in casting industries. Mechanica Confab, 2(3), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I. A. (2011). KAIZEN: The Japanese strategy for continuous improvement. VSRD International Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(3), 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, K., Kikuchi, T., & Takai, T. (2007). Method of overall consumable effectiveness. IEEE International symposium on semiconductor manufacturing, Santa Clara, USA, pp. 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1999). Strategy, value innovation and the knowledge economy. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1991). High involvement management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2000). Customer service excellence through people motivation and Kaizen. IEE Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), 5, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leede, J. D., & Looise, J. K. (1999). Continuous improvement and the mini-company concept. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(11), 1188–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leem, C. S., & Kim, J. (2004). An integrated evaluation system based on the continuous improvement model of IS performance. Industrial Management and Data System, 104(2), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljungstrom, M. (2005). A mode for starting up and implementing continuous improvement and work development in practice. The TQM Magazine, 17(5), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Jain, V. K. (1995). Organizational learning and continuous improvement. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackle, K. (2000). A frame work for implementation of Kaizen management system audit. IEE Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), 3, pp.1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. A., Li-bin, L., YeZhuang, T., & Xiao-lin, S. (2007) Continuous improvement practices in Asian developing countries: A comparative analysis between Chinese and Pakistani manufacturing industry. 14th International conference on management science and engineering, Harbin, P.R. China, pp. 692–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oprime, P. C., Mendes, G. H., & Pimenta, M. L. (2012). Continuous improvement: Critical factors in Brazilian industrial companies. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(1), 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, V. S. (2001). Inventory management Kaizen. Proceedings 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology, Austin, pp. 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusiniak, S. (1996). Maximizing your IE value. Industrial Engineer, 28(6), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, A., Powell, J. A., & Formoso, C. T. (2000). Setting stretch targets for driving continuous improvement in construction: analysis of Brazilian Company. Work Study, 49(2), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savino, M. M., & Mazza, A. (2014). Toward environmental and quality sustainability-an integrated approach for continuous improvement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, T. I. (1999). Cycles of continuous improvement: Realizing competitive advantage through quality. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 19(11), 1203–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J. H. (1997). Kaizen Blitz. Industry Week, 246(16), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingeo, S. (1988). Non-stock production: The shingo system for continuous improvement. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siekman, P. (2002). Pentair fixes its own mess. Fortune, 146(6), 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W. (2009). Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change. Management Research News, 32(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderquist, K. (1996). Managing innovation in SMES: A comparison of companies in UK, France and Portugal. International Journal of Technology Management, 12(3), 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, S. G., Ho, S. M., Shumal, D., & Liu, P. C. (2006). Implementing FMEA in a collaborating supply chain environment. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 23(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski, M. (2001). The effect of continuous improvement and innovation management practices on small to medium performance. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Quality and Innovation Management, Euro-Australian Co-operation Centre for Global Management, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski, M. (2002). Achieving performance excellence through an integrated strategy of radical innovation and continuous improvement. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(2), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski, M., & Power, D. (2007). Increasing ISO 9000 certification benefits: A continuous improvement approach. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(2), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, Y. (1994). Involving staff in the process of continuous improvement. Training for Quality, 2(3), 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonnessen, T. (2005). Continuous innovation through wide employee participation. The TQM Magazine, 17(2), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassie, L. (1998). A proactive team-based approach in health and safety management. Employee Relations, 20(6), 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. (1986). The deming management method. New York, NY: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. M. (1998). Implementing self managed process improving team in continuous improvement environment. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2001). Maximum cost reduction minimum effort. Manufacturing Engineer, 80(4), 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J. (1997). The six values of a quality culture. National Productivity Review, 16(2), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashina, H. (1995). Japanese manufacturing strategy and the role of total productive maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan-jiang, C., Lang, X. & Xiao-na, W. (2006). Empirical study of influencing factors of continuous improvement. International conference on management science and engineering, Lille, France, PP. 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yung, W. K. C. (1996). An integrated model for manufacturing process improvement. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 61(1), 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, J., Singh, H. (2019). Literature Review. In: Strategic Implementation of Continuous Improvement Approach. SpringerBriefs in Operations Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93121-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics