Skip to main content

The Distinctive Features of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in REBT

Abstract

Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) was originated by Albert Ellis in 1955 and, as such, it can be regarded as the first approach within the cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) tradition. People often ask what the differences are between REBT and CBT, but this is not a fair question as it would involve a comparison between a therapy approach (specific) with a therapy tradition (general), a bit like asking what the difference is between an apple (a specific fruit) and fruit (the general category). A fairer question would be: ‘What are the features of REBT that make it distinctive within the CBT tradition and within the wider field of psychotherapy?’ This chapter is devoted to answering this question. A word before we start. While some of the features discussed here are unique to REBT, others are not; but all these features taken together represent the distinctiveness of REBT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Other REBT scholars may give a higher rating towards the irrationality end of the continuum given the ease in which people think irrationally.

  2. 2.

    Other REBT scholars may give a ‘6’ towards the constitutionalism end of the continuum (rather than a ‘7’ in recognitition of there being a learned-cultural component to irrational beliefs.

  3. 3.

    While Ellis more frequently referred to rigid beliefs as absolute, he also used the term ‘rigid to refer to these primary irrational beliefs (Ellis & Joffe Ellis, 2011).

  4. 4.

    For research evidence on this and other points made in this chapter, see Chap. 5, this volume.

  5. 5.

    See Chap. 7 on ‘REBT and the Working Alliance’, this volume.

  6. 6.

    I refer to these doubts, reservations and objections here as DROs.

References

  • Bond, F. W., & Dryden, W. (2000). How rational beliefs and irrational beliefs affect people’s inferences: An experimental investigation. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R. (1991) Comprehensive cognitive disputing in rational-emotive therapy. In M. Bernard (Ed.), Using rational-emotive therapy effectively (pp. 173–195). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (1985). Challenging but not overwhelming: A compromise in negotiating homework assignments. British Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3(1), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (1987). Current issues in rational-emotive therapy. London, UK: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (1994). When musts are not enough: A note on determining the type of your client’s disturbance by referring to her secondary irrational beliefs. The Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapist, 2(2), 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (1997). Therapists’ dilemmas. Revised edition. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (1998). Understanding persons in the context of their problems: A rational emotive behaviour therapy perspective. In M. Bruch & F. W. Bond (Eds.), Beyond diagnosis: Case formulation approaches in CBT (pp. 43–64). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2001). Reason to change: A rational emotive behaviour therapy (REBT) workbook. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2015). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: Distinctive features (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2016). Attitudes in rational emotive behaviour therapy: Components, characteristics and adversity related consequences. London, UK: Rationality Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2018). Rational emotive behavioural coaching: Distinctive features. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W., & Neenan, M. (2004). The rational emotive behavioural approach to therapeutic change. London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1959). Requisite conditions for basic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 538–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1976). The biological basis of human irrationality. Journal of Individual Psychology, 32, 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1979). Discomfort anxiety: A new cognitive-behavioral construct (Part I). Rational Living, 14(2), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1980a). Discomfort anxiety: A new cognitive-behavioral construct (Part II). Rational Living, 15(1), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1980b). The value of efficiency in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice, 17, 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1983). The philosophic implications and dangers of some popular behavior therapy techniques. In M. Rosenbaum, C. M. Franks, & Y. Jaffe (Eds.), Perspectives in behavior therapy in the eighties (pp. 138–151). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Revised and updated edition. New York, NY: Birch Lane Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2000). How to control your anxiety before it controls you. New York, NY: Citadel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2002). Overcoming resistance: A rational emotive behavior therapy integrated approach. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Joffe Ellis, D. (2011). Rational emotive behaviour therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. I., & Davidson, J. (2014). The transdiagnostic road map so case formulation and treatment planning: Practical guidance for clinical decision making. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelle, L. A., & Ziegler, D. J. (1992). Personality theories: Basic assumptions, research and applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, F. (2015). Skills in cognitive behaviour therapy (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, D. J. (2000). Basic assumptions concerning human nature underlying rational emotive behaviour therapy (REBT) personality theory. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 18, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dryden, W. (2019). The Distinctive Features of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. In: Bernard, M.E., Dryden, W. (eds) Advances in REBT. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93118-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics