Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying Citizen Science to Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lake Restoration Handbook

  • 1082 Accesses

Abstract

Interest in citizen science is growing globally as environmental degradation continues, information needs increase and value of stronger relationships between the science community and public is recognised. How community volunteers participate in citizen science ranges from solely collecting environmental data to being fully engaged in project design and delivery. In New Zealand, community groups lead diverse environmental restoration projects. Responding to an online questionnaire, 137 groups (from a total of 296) reported carrying out their own monitoring to measure environmental change. While 98 of 239 groups reported an interest in monitoring water quality in the future, current freshwater monitoring activities were reported as limited (33 of 143 groups). Current monitoring centred mostly on stream macroinvertebrate counts. Three case studies are presented that outline how community groups have engaged in collecting water quality data. In contrast, a strong culture of volunteer water quality monitoring exists where programmes are designed to educate participants while also providing data for fundamental research, e.g. in the USA, and for government agency-led environmental decision-making. To encourage wider participation of communities, professional scientists and government agencies in citizen science, principles underpinning the development and implementation of long-term volunteer monitoring programmes are outlined. Stronger community participation in monitoring has the potential to improve both scientific and environmental literacy while building more complete data sets describing trends in freshwater resources. Furthermore, in New Zealand an informed and engaged public is in line with goals of local, regional and national government to increase public involvement in freshwater through participatory decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen A, King J, Oakden J (2014) Three case studies: companion document to the evaluation of the sustainable farming fund. Kinnect Group, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell S, Koenig J (2010) Using CyberTracker – indigenous rangers demonstrate a flexible data collection and monitoring tool and report on extensive on-ground works. Ecol Manag Restor 12:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann RW, Bigham DL, Hoyer MV et al (2012) Factors determining the distributions of total phosphorus, total nitrogen and chlorophyll a in Florida lakes. Lake Reserv Manag 28:10–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine DJ, Davies-Colley RJ (2010) Water quality trends at NRWQN sites for the period 1989–2007. NIWA Report HAM2009-026. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJF, Kilroy C, Mulcock CM, Scarsbrook M, Ogilvie S (2002) New Zealand stream health monitoring and assessment kit. Stream monitoring manual. Version 2. NIWA Technical Report 111- 1. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigham DL (2012) Analyses of temporal changes in trophic state variables in Florida lakes. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bone J, Archer M, Barraclough D, Eggleton P, Flight D, Head M, Jones DT, Scheib C, Voulvoulis N (2012) Public participation in soil surveys: lessons from a pilot study in England. Environ Sci Technol 46:3687–3696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney R, Ballard HL, Jordan R, McCallie E, Phillips T, Shirk J, Wilderman CC (2009) Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brossard D, Lewenstein B, Bonney R (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: the impact of a citizen science project. Int J Sci Educ 27(9):1099–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumby A, Hartley S, Salmon R (2015) Evaluation of the Great Kereru Count 2014 and recommendations for future citizen science projects. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Water Resources Control Board (2012) Creekwatch: explore your watershed. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Hunt DM, Campbell-Hunt C (2013) Ecosanctuaries: communities building a future for New Zealand’s threatened ecologies. Otago University Press, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield DE Jr, Brown CD, Bachman RW, Hoyer MV (2002) Volunteer lake monitoring: testing the reliability of data collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH Program. Lake Reserv Manag 18:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey CC, Weathers KC, Ewing HA, Greer ML, Cottingham KL (2014) Spatial and temporal variability in recruitment of the cyanobacterium Gloeotrichia echinulata in an oligotrophic lake. Freshw Sci 33:577–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr A (2004) Why do we all need community science? Soc Nat Resour 17:841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary EG, Snyder M (1999) The motivations to volunteer: theoretical and practical considerations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier K, Clarkson B, Aldridge B, Hicks BJ (2008) Can urban streams be restored? Linking vegetation restoration with urban stormwater mitigation. New Zealand Water and Wastes Association. conference. www.streamcare.org.nz/Collier_2008_Stormwater_paper.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2018

  • Conrad C, Daoust T (2008) Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environ Manag 41:358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad C, Hilchey K (2011) A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ Monit Assess 176:273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham KL, Ewing HA, Greer ML, Carey CC, Weather KL (2015) Cyanobacteria as drivers of lake nitrogen and phosphorus cycling. Ecosphere 6:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crall AW, Jordan R, Holfelder K, Newman GJ, Graham J, Waller DM (2012) The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Underst Sci 22:745–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A (2005) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv 14:2507–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derby M (2012) Local and regional government. https://teara.govt.nz/en/local-and-regional-government/print. Accessed 9 Sept 2018

  • Dickinson J, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, Phillips T, Purcell K (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ 10:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely E (2008) Volunteer monitoring and the democratization of science. Volunt Monit 19:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firehock K, West J (1995) A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 14:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fore LS, Paulsen K, O’Laughlin K (2001) Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshw Biol 46:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friends of Waiwhetu Stream (2013) Annual Report, 26 November 2013. Friends of Waiwhetu Stream, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffredo S, Pensa F, Neri P, Orlandi A, Gagliardi MS, Velardi A, Piccinetti C, Zaccanti F (2010) Unite research with what citizens do for fun: “recreational monitoring” of marine biodiversity. Ecol Appl 20:2170–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M (2015) Citizen science and policy: a European perspective, Case study series, vol 4. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Handford P (2011) Community conservation in New Zealand: towards a shared approach. PA Handford & Associates, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard G, Breese T (2010) The state of environmental reporting: the best way forward for environmental reporting in New Zealand. Linc Plan Rev 2:28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Horizon Research (2013) Business and consumer behaviour 2013. Prepared for the Sustainable Business Council in association with Fairfax Media. Horizon Research, Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer MV, Wellendorf N, Frydenborg R, Bartlett D, Canfield DE (2012) A comparison between professionally (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) and volunteer (Florida LAKEWATCH) collected trophic state chemistry data in Florida. Lake Reserv Manag 28:277–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer M, Bigham D, Bachmann R, Canfield DE (2014) Florida LAKEWATCH: citizen scientists protecting Florida’s aquatic systems. Fla Sci 77:184–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer MV, Terrell JB, Canfield DE Jr (2015) Chain of eutrophication models for assessing the potential impact of nutrient enrichment on Choctawhatchee Bay, FL, USA. Fla Sci 78:20–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughey K, Kerr G, Cullen R (2013) Public perceptions of New Zealand’s environment: 2010. EOS Ecology, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos MediaCT (2013a) Our mobile planet: New Zealand. Google, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos MediaCT (2013b) Our mobile planet: United States of America. Google, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan R, Gray SA, Howe DV, Brooks WR, Ehrenfeld JG (2011) Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen science programs. Conserv Biol 25:1148–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebo S, Bunch M (2013) Canadian ENGOs in governance of water resources: information needs and monitoring practices. Environ Monit Assess 185:9451–9460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levrel H, Fontaine B, Henry P-Y, Frederic J, Romain J, Christian K, Denis C (2010) Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: a French example. Ecol Econ 69:1580–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Gibbons D (2012) Can we make biodiversity monitoring happen in Australia? Moving beyond ‘it’s the thought that counts. In: Lindenmayer D, Gibbons D (eds) Biodiversity monitoring in Australia. CSIRO, Collinwood, VIC, Australia, pp 193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Likens G (2010) Effective ecological monitoring. CSIRO, Collingwood, VIC, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark C (2003) BioBlitz: getting into backyard biodiversity. Bioscience 53(4):329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine Volunteer Lake Monitoring Programme (2012) Maine Lakes Report 2012. Maine Volunteer Lake Monitoring Programme, Auburn, ME, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean I (2014) Community action and science help restore New Zealand lakes. Solutions 5:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing A, Primack R, Bonney R (2012) The history of public participation in ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 10:285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment (2013) Freshwater reform 2013 and beyond. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Government (2014a) National policy statement for freshwater management. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Government (2014b) Resource Management Act 1991. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Landcare Trust (2013) End-of-drain treatment systems. NZ Landcare Trust, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Marine Studies Centre (2012) Marine Metre Squared: developing community tools for marine monitoring. New Zealand Marine Studies Centre, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman GJ, Wiggins A, Crall AW, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K (2012) The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Front Ecol Environ 10:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obrecht D, Milanik M, Perkins B, Ready D, Jones JJ (1998) Evaluation of data gnerated from lake samples collected by volunteers. J Lake Reserv Manag 14:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Auditor-General (2011) Managing freshwater quality: challenges for regional councils. Office of the Auditor-General, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Air Laboratories (2013) OPAL community environment report. Imperial College London, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (2013) Water quality in New Zealand: land use and nutrient pollution. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters MA, Hamilton D, Eames C (2015) Action on the ground: a review of community environmental groups’ restoration objectives, activities and partnerships in New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 29:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock R, Whitelaw G (2005) Community-based monitoring in support of local sustainability. Local Environ 10:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MC, Colin M (2008) Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: what would it really take? Sci Commun 30:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Andreotta M, Brusseau M, Artiola J, Maier RM, Gandolfi AJ (2015) Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: the Gardenroots case study. Int Public Health J 7:pii 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravine D (2007) Manawatu River Estuary Ramsar management plan 2007–2012. Manawatu Estuary Trust, Foxton, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross D (2009) Landcare in New Zealand. In: Catacutan D, Neely C, Johnson M, Poussard H, Youl R (eds) Landcare: local action, global progress. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotokare Scenic Reserve Trust (2014) Annual report: biosecurity and ecological activities July 2013–June 2014. Rotokare Scenic Reserve Trust, Taranaki, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarnelle O, Morrison J, Kaul R, Horst G, Wandell H, Bednarz R (2010) Citizen monitoring: testing hypotheses about the interactive influences of eutrophication and mussel invasion on a cyanobacterial toxin in lakes. Water Res 4:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savan B, Morgan AJ, Gore C (2003) Volunteer environmental monitoring and the role of the universities: the case of citizens’ environment watch. Environ Manag 31:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scassa T, Chung H (2015) Typology of citizen science projects from an intellectual property perspective: invention and authorship between researchers and participants. Policy memo series, volume 5. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk J, Ballard HL, Wilderman C, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Jordan R, McCallie E, Minarchek M, Lewenstein BV, Krasny ME, Bonney R (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecol Soc 17:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurr EB (2012) New Zealand garden bird survey – analysis of the first four years. N Z J Ecol 36:287–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher A, Griffiths D, Hodgson D, Inger R (2013) Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the apprehensive. Ecol Evol 3:5268–5278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrell JB, Watson DL, Hoyer MV, Allen MS, Canfield DE (2000) Temporal water chemistry trends (1967–1997) for a population of Florida waterbodies. Lake Reserv Manag 16:177–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tipa G, Teirney L (2003) A cultural health index for streams and waterways: indicators for recognising and expressing Maori values. Report prepared for the Ministry for the Environment ME475. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull DJ, Bonney R, Bascom D, Cabral A (2000) Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Sci Educ 84:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweddle JC, Robinson LD, Pocock MJO, Roy HE (2012) Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the U.K. Natural History Museum and NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology for UK-EOF, London, 29 p

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (2012) The United Nations world water development report 4: managing water under uncertainty and risk. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) The volunteer monitor’s guide to quality assurance project plans. EPA 841-B-96-003. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Catalog of watershed groups. http://water.epa.gov/action/adopt/network.cfm. Accessed 24 Jan 2014

  • University of Wisconsin Parkside (2014) Algae estimator. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=appinventor.ai_yelirkered.AlgaeEstimator_WeatherAPI&hl=en. Accessed 15 Dec 2014

  • Verburg P, Hamill M, Unwin J, Abell JA (2010) Lake water quality in New Zealand 2010: status and trends. NIWA Report HAM2010-107 to the Ministry for the Environment. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins A, Newman G, Stevenson R, Crowston K (2011) Mechanisms for data quality and validation in citizen science. Proceedings of the eScience 2011 workshop on computing for citizen science, IEEE, Stockholm, Sweden 5–8 December 2011, pp 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014) World development indicators: size of the economy. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington JP, Silvertown J, Cook L, Cameron R, Dodd M, Greenwood RM, McConway K, Skelton P (2012) Evolution Megalab: a case study in citizen science methods. Methods Ecol Evol 3:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao X, Dorovskoy P, Biradar C, Bridge E (2011) A library of georeferenced photos from the field. Earth Space Sci News 92:453–454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. David Hamilton

    Present address: Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Monica A. Peters

  2. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

    David Hamilton

  3. Technology, Environmental, Mathematics and Science Education Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Chris Eames

Authors
  1. Monica A. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Hamilton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chris Eames
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

    David P. Hamilton

  2. Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Kevin J. Collier

  3. NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research), Hamilton, New Zealand

    John M. Quinn

  4. NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research), Christchurch, New Zealand

    Clive Howard-Williams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peters, M.A., Hamilton, D., Eames, C. (2018). Applying Citizen Science to Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration. In: Hamilton, D., Collier, K., Quinn, J., Howard-Williams, C. (eds) Lake Restoration Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93043-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation