Advertisement

Horizontally Elastic Not-First/Not-Last Filtering Algorithm for Cumulative Resource Constraint

  • Roger Kameugne
  • Sévérine Betmbe Fetgo
  • Vincent Gingras
  • Yanick Ouellet
  • Claude-Guy Quimper
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10848)

Abstract

Fast and powerful propagators are the main key to the success of constraint programming on scheduling problems. It is, for example, the case with the cumulative constraint, which is used to model tasks sharing a resource of discrete capacity. In this paper, we propose a new not-first/not-last rule, which we call the horizontally elastic not-first/not-last, based on strong relaxation of the earliest completion time of a set of tasks. This computation is obtained when scheduling the tasks in a horizontally elastic way. We prove that the new rule is sound and is able to perform additional adjustments missed by the classic not-first/not-last rule. We use the new data structure called Profile to propose a \(\mathcal {O}(n^3)\) filtering algorithm for a relaxed variant of the new rule where n is the number of tasks sharing the resource. We prove that the proposed algorithm still dominates the classic not-first/not-last algorithm. Experimental results on highly cumulative instances of resource constrained project scheduling problems (RCPSP) show that using this new algorithm can substantially improve the solving process of instances with an occasional and marginal increase of running time.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggoun, A., Beldiceanu, N.: Extending CHIP in order to solve complex scheduling and placement problems. Math. Comput. Model. 17(7), 57–73 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability, vol. 29. W. H. Freeman, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baptiste, P., Le Pape, C., Nuijten, W.: Constraint-Based Scheduling: Applying Constraint Programming to Scheduling Problems. Kluwer, Boston (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kameugne, R., Fotso, L.P., Scott, J., Ngo-Kateu, Y.: A quadratic edge-finding filtering algorithm for cumulative resource constraints. Constraints 19(3), 243–269 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gay, S., Hartert, R., Schaus, P.: Simple and scalable time-table filtering for the cumulative constraint. In: Pesant, G. (ed.) CP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9255, pp. 149–157. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23219-5_11CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kameugne, R., Fotso, L.P.: A cumulative not-first/not-last filtering algorithm in \(\cal{O}(n^2 \rm {log}(\rm n))\). Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 44(1), 95–115 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vilím, P.: Edge finding filtering algorithm for discrete cumulative resources in \({\cal{O}}(kn\,{\rm log}\,n)\). In: Gent, I.P. (ed.) CP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5732, pp. 802–816. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gingras, V., Quimper, C.-G.: Generalizing the edge-finder rule for the cumulative constraint. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2016), pp. 3103–3109 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Schutt, A., Wolf, A.: A new \({\cal{O}}(n^2\log n)\) not-first/not-last pruning algorithm for cumulative resource constraints. In: Cohen, D. (ed.) CP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6308, pp. 445–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15396-9_36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baptiste, P., Le Pape, C.: Constraint propagation and decomposition techniques for highly disjunctive and highly cumulative project scheduling problems. Constraints 5(1–2), 119–139 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Derrien, A., Petit, T.: A new characterization of relevant intervals for energetic reasoning. In: O’Sullivan, B. (ed.) CP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8656, pp. 289–297. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10428-7_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlier, J., Néron, E.: On linear lower bounds for the resource constrained project scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 149(2), 314–324 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koné, O., Artigues, C., Lopez, P., Mongeau, M.: Event-based milp models for resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Comput. Oper. Res. 38(1), 3–13 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Letort, A., Beldiceanu, N., Carlsson, M.: A scalable sweep algorithm for the cumulative constraint. In: Milano, M. (ed.) CP 2012. LNCS, pp. 439–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gay, S., Hartert, R., Lecoutre, C., Schaus, P.: Conflict ordering search for scheduling problems. In: Pesant, G. (ed.) CP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9255, pp. 140–148. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23219-5_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prud’homme, C., Fages, J.-G., Lorca, X.: Choco Solver Documentation, TASC, INRIA Rennes, LINA CNRS UMR 6241, COSLING S.A.S. (2016). http://www.choco-solver.org

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Kameugne
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sévérine Betmbe Fetgo
    • 3
  • Vincent Gingras
    • 4
  • Yanick Ouellet
    • 4
  • Claude-Guy Quimper
    • 4
  1. 1.University of MarouaMarouaCameroon
  2. 2.University of BamendaBamendaCameroon
  3. 3.University of DschangDschangCameroon
  4. 4.Université LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations