Abstract
The focus of this chapter is on the detection of signals that have a known form or structure when they are occluded by additive noise. The most common example of signals with known form is from active remote sensing where a known source signal is projected into the underwater environment and the sounds measured by a sensor are then analyzed to achieve one of the inferential objectives. Matched-filter detectors (also known as replica correlators or pulse compressors) are derived under a variety of assumptions about the signal amplitude and phase. Waveform autocorrelation and ambiguity functions are introduced to represent the response of the matched filter to mismatch in time and Doppler and presented for the standard sonar pulses (continuous-wave, linear- and hyperbolic-frequency-modulated pulses). Conventional beamforming of an array of sensors is shown to be a spatial matched filter detector. The differences between resolution, accuracy, and ambiguity with respect to parameter estimation are articulated. Lower bounds on the variance are derived for estimating signal strength, phase, time of arrival, and Doppler scale, including examples using the standard sonar pulses. Many practical aspects of sonar signal processing are covered including the effect of oversampling on false alarm rate, normalization of a time-varying background noise and reverberation power (cell-averaging and order-statistic normalizers), Doppler filter banks (with a fast-Fourier-transform implementation for continuous-wave pulses), and using incoherent integration to surmount temporal spreading losses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As described in Sect. 6.3.4, the likelihood function of a parameter is simply the PDF taken as a function of the parameter.
- 2.
This is more accurately described as a fractional SNR.
- 3.
One might say there is ambiguity in the definition.
- 4.
Note that definitions of the NAF can vary in the sign on δ.
- 5.
The matched filtering can equivalently be replaced by a narrowband filter for frequency-domain processing of random signals or signals with unknown form.
- 6.
Note that because this is based on the CRLB, the achieved estimation performance will vary unless the estimator is efficient and therefore meets the bound.
- 7.
Acknowledgement: NURC Clutter JRP [57] with gratitude to Dr. P. Nielsen (scientist in charge, Clutter 2007 Experiment).
- 8.
This is because a gamma random variable with shape parameter α and scale β has the same distribution as the sum of α independent exponential random variables with mean β.
- 9.
The trace of a matrix is the sum of the diagonal elements.
References
G. Turi,. An introduction to matched filters. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 6(3), 311–329 (1960)
R.N. McDonough, A.D. Whalen, Detection of Signals in Noise, 2nd edn. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1995)
S.M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory (Prentice Hall PTR, 1998)
L.L. Scharf, Statistical Signal Processing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991)
S.A. Kassam, Signal Detection in Non-Gaussian Noise (Springer, New York, 1988)
N. Mukhopadhyay, Probability and Statistical Inference (Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 2000)
E.L. Lehmann, J.P. Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd edn. (Springer, New York, 2005)
C.W. Helstrom, Elements of Signal Detection and Estimation (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995)
M.A. Richards, Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005)
P.Z. Peebles, Jr., Radar Principles (Wiley, New York, 1998)
D.W. Ricker, Echo Signal Processing (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 2003)
R.O. Nielsen, Sonar Signal Processing (Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1991)
H.L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory: Part III (Wiley, New York, 1971)
P.M. Woodward, Probability and Information Theory, with Applications to Radar (Pergamon Press, New York, 1964)
A.W. Rihaczek, Delay-Doppler ambiguity function for wideband signals. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-3(4), 705–711 (1967)
A.W. Rihaczek, Principles of High Resolution Radar (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969)
D.W. Ricker, The Doppler sensitivity of large TW phase modulated waveforms. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40(10), 2406–2413 (1992)
N. Levanon, E. Mozeson, Radar Signals (Wiley-Interscience, 2004)
S.M. Kay, Modern Spectral Estimation Theory and Application (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988)
W.J. Albersheim, A closed-form approximation to Robertson’s detection characteristics. Proc. IEEE 69(7), 839 (1981)
H. Hmam, SNR calculation procedure for target types 0, 1, 2, 3. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 41(3), 1091–1096 (2005)
K. Oldham, J. Myland, J. Spanier, An Atlas of Functions, 2nd edn. (Springer Science, New York, 2009)
I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, in Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th edn., ed. by D. Zwillinger (Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2015)
T. Kailath, Linear Systems (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980)
A.B. Carlson, Communication Systems (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986)
S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, 3rd edn. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996)
A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1991)
J.V. DiFranco, W.L. Rubin, Radar Detection (Artech House, Dedham, MA, 1980)
D. Halliday, R. Resnick, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley, New York, 1981)
E.J. Kelly, R.P. Wishner, Matched-filter theory for high-velocity accelerating targets. IEEE Trans. Mil. Electron. Mil-9, 56–69 (1965)
Z. Lin, Wideband ambiguity function of broadband signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83(6), 2108–2116 (1988)
D.M. Russo, C.L. Bartberger, Ambiguity diagram for linear FM sonar. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 38(2), 183–190 (1965)
B. Harris, S.A. Kramer, Asymptotic evaluation of the ambiguity functions of high-gain FM matched filter sonar systems. Proc. IEEE 56(12), 2149–2157 (1968)
J.J. Kroszczynski, Pulse compression by means of linear-period modulation. Proc. IEEE 57(7), 1260–1266 (1969)
R.A. Altes, Some invariance properties of the wideband ambiguity function. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 53(4), 1154–1160 (1973)
D.A. Swick, A review of wideband ambiguity functions. NRL Report 6994, Naval Research Laboratory, December 1969
L.H. Sibul, E.L. Titlebaum, Volume properties for the wideband ambiguity function. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-17(1), 83–87 (1981)
F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark (eds.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)
R.C. Thor, A large time-bandwidth product pulse-compression technique. IRE Trans. Mil. Electron. MIL-6(2), 169–173 (1962)
R.A. Altes, E.L. Titlebaum, Bat signals as optimally Doppler tolerant waveforms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48(4), 1014–1020 (1970)
H.L. Van Trees, Optimum Array Processing (Wiley, New York, 2002)
D.H. Johnson, D.E. Dudgeon, Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993)
S. Haykin (ed.), Array Signal Processing (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985)
B.D. Van Veen, K.M. Buckley, Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE ASSP Mag. 5(2), 4–24 (1988)
H. Krim, M. Viberg, Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 13(4), 67–94 (1996)
R.J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983)
S.M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory (Prentice Hall PTR, 1993)
P. Bello, Joint estimation of delay, Doppler, and Doppler rate. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 6(3), 330–341 (1960)
E.J. Kelly, The radar measurement of range, velocity and acceleration. IRE Trans. Mil. Electron. MIL-5(2), 51–57 (1961)
J.P. Ovarlez, Cramer Rao bound computation for velocity estimation in the broad-band case using the Mellin transform, in 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 1, pp. 273–276, 1993
H.L. Van Trees, K.L. Bell (eds.), Bayesian Bounds for Parameter Estimation and Nonlinear Filtering/Tracking (IEEE Press Wiley-Interscience, 2007)
S.A. Kramer, Doppler and acceleration tolerances of high-gain, wideband linear FM correlation sonars. Proc. IEEE 55(5), 627–636 (1967)
P. Swerling, Parameter estimation for waveforms in additive Gaussian noise. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 7(2), 152–166 (1959)
E.W. Barankin, Locally best unbiased estimates. Ann. Math. Stat. 20(4), 447–501 (1949)
J. Ziv, M. Zakai, Some lower bounds on signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 15(3), 386–391 (1969)
L. Cohen, Time-Frequency Analysis (Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995)
Acknowledgement: These data were made possible by funding from the Office of Naval Research (Codes 321US and 322OA) and the CLUTTER Joint Research Project (JRP), including as Participants the NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC), Pennsylvania State University - ARL-PSU (USA), Defence Research and Development Canada - DRDC-A (CAN), and the Naval Research Laboratory - NRL (USA). Scientist in charge: Dr. P. Nielsen
C.H. Harrison, Closed-form expressions for ocean reverberation and signal excess with mode stripping and Lambert’s law. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114(5), 2744–2756 (2003)
A.H. Nuttall, A.F. Magaraci, Signal-to-noise ratios required for short-term narrowband detection of Gaussian processes. Tech. Rpt. 4417, Naval Underwater Systems Center, Newport, RI, October 1972
D.A. Abraham, Performance analysis of constant-false-alarm-rate detectors using characteristic functions. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2017.2771878
N.L. Johnson, S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 2, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1995)
V.G. Hansen, H.R. Ward, Detection performance of the cell averaging LOG/CFAR receiver. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-8(5), 648–652 (1972)
P.P. Gandhi, S.A. Kassam, Analysis of CFAR processors in nonhomogenous background. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 24(4), 427–445 (1988)
H.A. David, H.N. Nagaraja, Order Statistics, 3rd edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003)
M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover Publications, New York, 1972)
H. Rohling, Radar CFAR thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-19(4), 608–621 (1983)
H. Cramér, Random Variables and Probability Distributions. Number 36 in Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1937)
H.L. Van Trees, Optimum signal design and processing for reverberation-limited environments. IEEE Trans. Mil. Electron. 9(3), 212–229 (1965)
T. Arase, E.M. Arase, Deep-sea ambient-noise statistics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44(6), 1679–1684 (1968)
D.R. Morgan, Two-dimensional normalization techniques. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 12(1), 130–142 (1987)
D.E. Weston, Correlation loss in echo ranging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37(1), 119–124 (1965)
S.M. Garber, High resolution sonar signals in a multipath environment. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-2(6), 431–440 (1966)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix 8.A: Example MATLAB® Code for a Doppler Filter Bank
Appendix 8.A: Example MATLAB® Code for a Doppler Filter Bank
The following MATLAB® code implements a Doppler filter bank using fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) as described in Sect. 8.7.1.4. It is assumed that the data have been basebanded and decimated to a band appropriate to the radial velocities of interest. In producing the filter bank, a 50% overlap in time has been implemented and zero-padding of the FFT has been used to interpolate in frequency, which produces correlated Doppler channels. The response of the filter bank is converted to radial velocity assuming a monostatic active sonar geometry. The sample signal generated includes reverberation and an echo near 30 s with approximately 10-kn radial velocity.
% Setup for Doppler filter bank Ts=60; % Pulse repetition period (s) Tp=1; % Pulse duration (s) fc=1500; % Frequency of pulse fs=40; % Sampling frequency (Hz) cwkn=2916; % Speed of sound (kn) %--------------------------------------------------------- % Generate sample complex-envelope data Nx=round(Ts∗fs); tx=(0:Nx-1)'/fs; x=randn(Nx,2)∗[1;1j]/sqrt(2)+5./sqrt(1+tx)... +2∗exp(1j∗2∗pi∗10∗tx).∗(abs(tx-Tp/2-30)<Tp/2); %--------------------------------------------------------- % Number of samples in pulse duration N=round(Tp∗fs); % FFT size (increase the '1' to interpolate more in frequency) Nfft=2ˆ(nextpow2(N)+1); % Number of FFTs without overlapping Nt=floor((length(x)-N/2)/N); % Pulse shading vector & matrix a=tukeywin(N,0.1); A=a∗ones(1,Nt); % FFTs for non-overlapped windows Y1=fftshift(fft(A.∗reshape(x(1:Nt∗N),N,Nt),Nfft),1); % FFTs for 50% overlapping Y2=fftshift(fft(A.∗reshape(x(round(N/2)... +(1:Nt∗N)),N,Nt),Nfft),1); % Combine into one matrix Y=10∗log10(abs(reshape([Y1;Y2],Nfft,2∗Nt)).ˆ2)'; % Velocity and time vectors for plotting vkn=[((Nfft/2):(Nfft-1))-Nfft 0:(Nfft/2-1)]'∗... fs∗cwkn/(2∗fc∗Nfft); ts=(0:size(Y,2)-1)∗(N/2)/fs; %--------------------------------------------------------- % Plot normalized intensity in decibels figure(2); clf; imagesc(vkn,ts,Y-median(Y(:))); set(gca,'YDir','normal'); set(gca,'TickDir','out'); shading flat xlabel('Radial velocity (kn)'); ylabel('Time (s)'); caxis([-5 25]); colorbar;
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abraham, D.A. (2019). Detecting Signals with Known Form: Matched Filters. In: Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92981-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92983-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)