Abstract
In most applications of remote sensing, signals have an unknown arrival time (e.g., arising from an unknown range in active sensing) and often an unknown duration. Detectors for such signals, which sequentially incorporate and test data as it is measured, are derived and evaluated in this chapter. Sliding incoherent sum and sliding M-of-N (binary integration) detectors are presented for cases where the signal duration is known but the starting time is not. For the opposite scenario, where the starting time is known and the signal duration is not, the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) is used. When neither the starting time nor signal duration is known, Page’s test is shown to arise as a generalized likelihood ratio detector. For each of these detectors, the probability of false alarm is one because they will eventually declare a detection when left to run for an infinitely long time. As such, the average time between false alarms is introduced and used as a performance metric in addition to the probability of detection and average delay before detection. Various techniques are presented for evaluating the performance measures including approximations and a quantization approach. The chapter is concluded with a design example applying Page’s test to data from a cell-averaging normalizer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In some texts the stopping time is described using the infimum (“inf”) rather than minimum so as to include the limiting case of K →∞.
- 2.
The SNR s here is equivalent to the S d used in earlier chapters. However, owing to the applicability of sequential detectors to other scenarios a generic SNR term is used.
- 3.
Note that in most texts on sequential detection and hypothesis testing the variable N is used to describe the stopping time. In this text the variable K is used so as to avoid confusion with the N in M-of-N detectors.
- 4.
- 5.
Note that in Wald’s book [1] and some others on sequential analysis, A and B are the opposite of the variables used here.
- 6.
- 7.
Note that if E 0[g(X)] = 0 and E s[g(X)] > 0, the relationship between D and F is quadratic (F ∼ D 2); clearly this should be avoided.
References
A. Wald, Sequential Analysis (Wiley, 1947)
Z. Govindarajulu, The Sequential Statistical Analysis of Hypothesis Testing, Point and Interval Estimation, and Decision, Theory (American Sciences Press, 1987)
B.K. Ghosh, P.K. Sen (eds.), Handbook of Sequential Analysis (Marcel Dekker, 1991)
A. Tartakovsky, I. Nikiforov, M. Basseville, Sequential Analysis: Hypothesis Testing and Changepoint Detection (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014)
D. Siegmund, Sequential Analysis (Springer, 1985)
C. Forbes, M. Evans, N. Hastings, B. Peacock, Statistical Distributions, 4th edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011)
S.A. Kassam, Signal Detection in Non-Gaussian Noise (Springer, New York, 1988)
M.A. Richards, Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005)
J.V. DiFranco, W.L. Rubin, Radar Detection (Artech House, Dedham, MA, 1980)
P.K. Varshney, Distributed Detection and Data Fusion (Springer, New York, 1996)
J.V. Harrington, An analysis of the detection of repeated signals in noise by binary integration. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1(1), 1–9 (1955)
D.A. Shnidman, Binary integration for Swerling target fluctuations. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 34(3), 1043–1053 (1998)
D.A. Abraham, Optimization of M-of-N detectors in heavy-tailed noise, in Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/MTS Oceans Conference, Charleston, SC, 2018
T.L. Lai, Control charts based on weighted sums. Ann. Stat. 2(1), 134–147 (1974)
W. Böhm, P. Hackl, Improved bounds for the average run length of control charts based on finite weighted sums. Ann. Stat. 18(4), 1895–1899 (1990)
P. Williams, Evaluating the state probabilities of m out of n sliding window detectors. Tech. Rpt. DSTO-TN-0132, Maritime Operations Division Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, February 1998
D.A. Abraham, Analysis and design of sliding m-of-n detectors. Tech. Rpt. 2011-01, CausaSci LLC, http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA565377, 2011
J.I. Naus, Approximations for distributions of scan statistics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77(377), 177–183 (1982)
J. Glaz, J. Naus, S. Wallenstein, Scan Statistics (Springer, New York, 2001)
C. Stein, A note on cumulative sums. Ann. Math. Stat. 17(4), 498–499 (1946)
A. Wald, J. Wolfowitz, Optimum character of the sequential probability ratio test. Ann. Math. Stat. 19(3), 326–339 (1948)
R.H. Berk, Locally most powerful sequential tests. Ann. Stat. 3(2), 373–381 (1975)
P.J. Huber, A robust version of the probability ratio test. Ann. Math. Stat. 36(6), 1753–1758 (1965)
W.J. Hall, R.A. Wijsman, J.K. Ghosh, The relationship between sufficiency and invariance with applications in sequential analysis. Ann. Math. Stat. 36(2), 575–614 (1965)
R.M. Phatarfod, Sequential analysis of dependent observations. I. Biometrika 52(1/2), 157–165 (1965)
C.D. Fuh, SPRT and CUSUM in hidden Markov models. Ann. Stat. 31(3), 942–977 (2003)
D. Siegmund, Corrected diffusion approximations and their applications, in Proc. Berkeley Conference in Honor of Jerzy Neyman and Jack Kiefer, ed. by L.M. Le Cam, R.A. Olshen (Wadsworth, 1985), pp. 599–617
R.A. Wijsman, Stopping times: Termination, moments, distribution, in Handbook of Sequential Analysis, ed. by B.K. Ghosh, P.K. Senn (Marcel Dekker, 1991)
D.A. Abraham, A Page test with nuisance parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 42(6), 2242–2252 (1996)
E.S. Page, Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41, 100–114 (1954)
G. Lorden, Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 42(6), 1897–1908 (1971)
G.V. Moustakides, Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions. Ann. Stat. 14(4), 1379–1387 (1986)
D.A. Abraham, Analysis of a signal starting time estimator based on the Page test statistic. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 33(4), 1225–1234 (1997)
J.H. Mathews, K.D. Fink, Numerical Methods Using MATLAB (Prentice Hall, 1999)
B. Broder, Quickest Detection Procedures and Transient Signal Detection, PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1990
S. Kullback, R.A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22(1), 79–86 (1951)
T.F. Dyson, Topics in Nonlinear Filtering and Detection, PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1986
D.A. Abraham, Asymptotically optimal bias for a general non-linearity in Page’s test. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 32(1), 360–367 (1996)
C. Han, P.K. Willett, D.A. Abraham, Some methods to evaluate the performance of Page’s test as used to detect transient signals. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47(8), 2112–2127 (1999)
R.L. Streit, Load modeling in asynchronous data fusion systems using Markov modulated Poisson processes and queues, in Proceedings of Signal Processing Workshop, Washington, D.C., March 24–25, 1995. Maryland/District of Columbia Chapter of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
D. Brook, D.A. Evans, An approach to the probability distribution of cusum run length. Biometrika 59(3), 539–549 (1972)
I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th edn., ed. by D. Zwillinger (Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abraham, D.A. (2019). Detecting Signals with Unknown Duration and/or Starting Time: Sequential Detectors. In: Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92981-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92983-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)