Advertisement

Virtual Places as Real Places: A Distinction of Virtual Places from Possible and Fictional Worlds

  • Tobias HolischkaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 95)

Abstract

The development and spreading of personal computers has changed our lives in many ways. One of them is the notable fact that we are confronted with virtual reality at an increasing rate. At first glance, one might think about video games and similar forms of entertainment, but meanwhile many other technology-related aspects are virtual as well, like social networks, email accounts, and even bank accounts. Some are part of our lifeworld, others are perceived to be ‘unreal’ – fictional, illusory, deceptive. A specification of the ontological status of virtual environments seems necessary. Therefore, we need to state more precisely what we’re actually speaking of by virtual reality. An interesting approach arises from thinking the virtual in terms of place: Where do video games take place? Where exactly is money in a bank account? Where are private email conversations stored? Virtual places are a suitable concept to explore computer-generated virtual reality, as it is independent from any specific content and hence allows a fundamental analysis. On this basis, we can compare virtual places with one another, with other non-material places like fictional places, and correlate them with the places of our lifeworld. This paper investigates the ontological status of virtual places by distinguishing them from fictional places and merely (logically) possible worlds. Virtual places thereby prove to be limited by consistency and human imagination, but also offer new features like interactivity and direct referencing of other users. As a spatial foundation for actual actions, they are part of our lifeworld.

Keywords

Place Virtual Reality Possibility Potentiality Modal logic Fiction Video games Philosophy 

References

  1. Augé, M. 1994. Orte und Nicht-Orte. Vorüberlegungen zu einer Ethnologie der Einsamkeit. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
  2. Capurro, R. 1987. Information. Ein Beitrag zur etymologischen und ideengeschichtlichen Begründung des Informationsbegriffs. Munich/New York/London/Paris: K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
  3. Casey, E.S. 1996. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In Senses of Place, ed. S. Feld and K.H. Basso, 13–52. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2009. Getting Back into Place. Toward a Renewed Understanding of the PlaceWorld. 2nd ed. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Haller, R. 1986. Wirkliche und fiktive Gegenstände. In Facta und Ficta. Studien zu ästhetischen Grundfragen, ed. R. Haller, 57–93. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  6. Hartmann, N. 1966. Möglichkeit und Wirklichkeit. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holischka, T. 2016. CyberPlaces. Philosophische Annäherungen an den virtuellen Ort. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ingarden, R. 1979. Konkretisation und Rekonstruktion. In Rezeptionsästhetik. Theorie und Praxis, ed. R. Warning, 42–70. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I. 2009. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kripke, S.A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Leibniz, G.W. 1985. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil. Trans. E.M. Hubbard. Lasalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, D.K. 1986. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Malpas, J.E. 1999. Place and Experience. A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2009. On the non-autonomy of the virtual. Convergence 15: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schlitte, A., T. Hünefeldt, D. Romić, and J. van Loon. 2014. Philosophie des Ortes. Reflexionen zum Spatial Turn in den Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. von Weizsäcker, C.V. 1979. Sprache als information. In Die Einheit der Natur. Studien von Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, ed. C.V. von Weizsäcker, 39–60. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
  17. Welsch, W. 1998. Eine Doppelfigur der Gegenwart. Virtualisierung und Revalidierung. In Medien-Welten. Wirklichkeiten, ed. W. Welsch and G. Vattimo, 229–248. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtEichstättGermany

Personalised recommendations