Abstract
This chapter investigates student learning in the context of a module about a city’s two-tiered financial system of banks and alternative financial institutions (i.e., pawnshops), held in ten sessions in a high school advisory class led by a mathematics teacher. The module exemplifies teaching mathematics for spatial justice, by extending teaching mathematics for social justice (Gutstein, 2006) with the idea that place matters (Gruenewald, 2003) and that justice has a geography (Soja, 2010). In this module, students use the concepts of percent to mathematize the costs of loans, and they analyze intensive variables to investigate spatial data about the density of these categories of institutions across their city. Spatial data is presented with GIS maps, layerable with demographic data and locations of financial institutions. The spatial distribution of the financial institutions reflects the inequalities of the spatial patterns in the city’s social demographics. Contextualized in the disparity of interest rates across these financial institutions, the spatial pattern not only reflects but reinforces those social inequalities. This chapter presents findings from one round of piloting and pursues the question: How did the module’s spatial justice orientation support the development of conceptual understanding of percent and ratio? Analysis focuses on growth with respect to mathematical understanding of percent and learning in class sessions organized around the use of ratios to understand the distribution. Findings include student adoption of strategies indicative of conceptual understandings of percent and development of critical opinions about their city’s two-tiered personal lending system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apple, M. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.
Brantlinger, A. (2005). The geometry of inequality. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethink-ing mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 97–100). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
City Digits. (2013). http://www.citydigits.org.
Dole, S. (2000). Promoting percent as a proportion in eighth-grade mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), 380–389.
Edelson, D. (2011, Spring). Scaling up classroom maps: “Geo learning”. Arcnews. Retrieved from www.esri.com/news/arcnews/spring11articles/
Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don’t know nothing I didn’t know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139–174.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Ginsburg, L., Gal, I., & Schuh, A. (1995). What does “100% juice” mean? Exploring adult learners’ informal knowledge of percent (Tech. Rep. No. TR95-17). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, National Center on Adult Literacy.
Goodchild, M. F., & Lam, N. S. (1980). Areal interpolation: A variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing, 1, 297–312.
Gruenewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious eduction. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
Haubner, M. A. (1992). Percents: Developing meaning through models. Arithmetic Teacher, 40(4), 232–234.
Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children’s thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41–61.
Lawvere, F. W. (1992). Categories of space and of quantity. In J. Echeverria, A. Ibarra, & T. Mormann (Eds.), The space of mathematics: Philosophical, epistemological, and historical explorations (pp. 14–30). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Lembke, L. O., & Reys, B. J. (1994). The development of, and interaction between, intuitive and school-taught ideas about percent. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 237.
Leonard, J., Brooks, W., Barnes-Johnson, J., & Berry, R. Q., III. (2010). The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 261–270.
Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lim, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2006). Science learning and a sense of place in an urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 107–142.
Lim, V. Y. (2016). Making change with mathematics: Youth conceptions of the role of mathe-matics in citizenship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Lo, J., & Ko, Y. (2013). A bargain price for teaching about percentage. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(2), 108–115.
Middleton, J., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1995). The ratio table. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 1(4), 282–288.
Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421–481.
Remillard, J., Ebby, C., Lim, V., Reinke, L., Hoe, N., & Magee, E. (2014). Increasing access to mathematics through locally relevant curriculum. In K. Karp (Ed.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education: Using research to improve instruction (pp. 89–96). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Root, R. (2009). Social justice through quantitative literacy: A course connecting numeracy, engaged citizenship, and a just society. Democracy & Education, 18(3), 37–43.
Rubel, L. H., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Lim, V. Y. (2016). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: Beyond a victory narrative. Harvard Educational Review, 86(4), 556–579.
Rubel, L., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Lim, V. (2017). Making space for place: The role of mapping tools inlearning as political formation. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26(4), 643-687
Rubel, L. H., Lim, V. Y., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Katz, S. R. (2016). Cash across the city: Participatory mapping & teaching for spatial justice. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, & Research, 12, 4–14.
Rubel, L. H., Lim, V. Y., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Sullivan, M. (2016). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: An investigation of the lottery. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 1–26.
Servon, L. (2013, October 29). The high cost, for the poor, of using a bank. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com
Slocum, T. (1998). Thematic cartography and visualization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-) understand science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
Streefland, L. (1985). Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(1), 75–94.
Techsmith. (2010). Camtasia for Mac [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.techsmith.com/video-editor.html
Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181–204.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Turner, E. E. (2012). Critical mathematical agency in the overcrowding at Francis middle school project. In A. Barton, E. Tan, E. Turner, & M. V. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools (pp. 51–76). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiebe, J. (1986). Manipulating percentages. Mathematics Teacher, 79(1), 23–26.
Wilkerson-Jerde, M., & Laina, V. (2015). Stories of our city: Coordinating youths’ mathematical, representational, and community knowledge through data visualization design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation [NSF] under Grant No. DRL-1222430. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. We acknowledge the significant contributions of MIT’s Civic Data Design Lab in the design of the digital maps and mapping tools described in this manuscript. This research would not have been possible without the generosity of time and spirit of teachers and students from the New York City Department of Education. This material extends findings presented in conference papers presented at Psychology of Mathematics Education North America in 2015 and 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rubel, L.H., Lim, V.Y., Hall-Wieckert, M. (2018). “So We Only Have One We Share with More, and Then They Have Way More and They Share with Less”: Mathematics and Spatial Justice. In: Bartell, T. (eds) Toward Equity and Social Justice in Mathematics Education. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92907-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92907-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92906-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92907-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)