Advertisement

Global Versus Local Integration and Europe’s Options

  • Arne Melchior
Chapter

Abstract

Using the world trade model, we show that small countries and countries with high trade barriers gain more than others from global trade integration. Poor countries and commodity exporters benefit along with others. For Western Europe, trade integration with other world regions could provide larger gains than intra-European integration, if a similar depth of integration could be achieved—however, it is not so easy. Also for Europe, trade liberalisation must be reciprocal if a loss of manufacturing is to be avoided. Integration between Europe and Asia could relocate manufacturing to Europe. With respect to trade integration within world regions, Asia and surprisingly Africa have most to gain from such integration, whereas Eastern Europe is at the other end of this scale—Russia should “go global” and engage in FTAs (Free Trade Agreements) beyond its neighbourhood.

References

  1. Fujita, M., & Krugman, P. (1995). When Is the Economy Monocentric? von Thünen and Chamberlin Unified. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fujita, M., & Mori, T. (2005). Frontiers of the New Economic Geography. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hamilton, D. S. (2018). Creating the North Atlantic Marketplace for Jobs and Growth. Three Paths, One Detour, A U-Turn, and the Road to Nowhere. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Melchior
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of International AffairsOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations