Skip to main content

Trade, USA and the Rise of China: Pains and Gains

  • 1619 Accesses

Abstract

Using the model presented in Chap. 6, we simulate China’s growth and show that it generates a welfare gain for the whole world. The gain is larger for countries close to China and for commodity exporters that gain from improved terms of trade. There is a reduction in manufacturing production in other countries, and for the USA and Western Europe, these pains are large compared to the gains. Simulating trade policy options for the USA, the analysis suggests that trade integration, also with Asia, is good for welfare as well as US manufacturing. Trade liberalisation has to be reciprocal; otherwise it hurts manufacturing. Hence President Trump is right about reciprocity, but wrong about trade agreements: Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are part of the solution and not the problem. Since China has grown in size and productivity, its share of the US trade deficit has increased. But the US trade deficit is a US problem and not a China problem; its trend over time looks about the same with or without China.

Keywords

  • Trade Integration
  • Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP)
  • North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
  • welfareWelfare
  • Trade deficitTrade Deficit

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92834-0_7
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-92834-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 7.1
Fig. 7.2
Fig. 7.3
Fig. 7.4
Fig. 7.5
Fig. 7.6
Fig. 7.7

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data source: United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database (COMTRADE). Observe that import data include cost, insurance and freight, while export data do not. When trade is balanced, the net trade ratio will therefore be slightly negative. This should be observed but is not a problem here since we focus on the trend over time and the comparison of the two curves.

  2. 2.

    We also run simulations of unilateral US liberalisation in NAFTA. Also in this case there was a welfare gain but contraction in US manufacturing. For brevity, these results are not reported here.

References

  • Baldwin, R., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Regional Economic Integration. In G. M. Grossmann & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1243–2107, Chapter 31, pp. 1597–1644). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergsten, C. F., & Gagnon, J. E. (2017). Currency Conflict and Trade Policy: A New Strategy for the United States. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S. (1996). The Role of the Dollar as an International Currency. Eastern Economic Journal, 22(2), 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2015). Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), 1–44.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, M. D., Eichengreen, B., & Ito, H. (2011). A Forensic Analysis of Global Imbalances (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 17513). http://www.nber.org

  • Gourinchas, P., & Rey, H. (2014). External Adjustment, Global Imbalances, Valuation Effects. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbooks in Economics, International Economics (Vol. 4, Chapter 10, pp. 583–645). Amsterdam/Oxford: North-Holland/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2004). The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade. In J. V. Henderson & J. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4, Cities and Geography (Chapter 29, pp. 2609–2669). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, A. (2009). European Integration and Domestic Regions. A Numerical Simulation Analysis. Warsaw: CASE Studies and Analyses No. 378/ 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, P., & Autry, G. (2011). Death by China. Confronting the Dragon—A Global Call to Action. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., & Deichmann, U. (2011). International Growth Spillovers, Geography and Infrastructure. The World Economy, 34(9), 1507–1533.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013). China 2030. Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative Society. Washington, DC: World Bank/Development Research Center of the State Council, the People’s Republic of China.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Melchior, A. (2018). Trade, USA and the Rise of China: Pains and Gains. In: Free Trade Agreements and Globalisation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92834-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92834-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92833-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92834-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)