Skip to main content

Building Socio-Ecological Coviability: An Efficient Way to Combat Poverty, Reduce Inequality and Address Insecurity Risks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human and Environmental Security in the Era of Global Risks
  • 605 Accesses

Abstract

The proliferation of conflicts throughout the world, increasing poverty, rising inequality, and the necessity of a social cohesion require adherence to the concept of socio-ecological systems (SES). This nexus constrains policies to be conceptualized in order to face, jointly, social and ecological dimensions and coerce identified decisions to spur mutual progress towards interlinked goals. To address such challenges with the required level of comprehensiveness and urgency, researchers and decision makers must first acknowledge the linkages between social and ecological problems within a coviability perspective. In addition, they are required to offer both empirical and analytical insights to these linkages in order to implement efficient policies, which are able to tackle major problems such as poverty, inequality, and insecurity risks. Traditional approaches to poverty eradication, for instance, often disregard environmental degradation and biodiversity loss as externalities, whereas the proposed SES approach considers not only the social but also the environmental cause, thereby providing a new redefinition of wealth and its components. Thus, efforts should be complemented by implementing initiatives aimed at enhancing social well-being for all people, and by addressing the root causes of poverty through coherent, coordinated and coviable strategies. To address the aforementioned issues in this chapter, some tools adapted from economic analyses and development economics, in addition to some success stories and empirical cases, are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • African Development Bank (AFDB) (2007) The poverty-environment Nexus in Africa. In: Gender, poverty and environmental indicators on African countries, vol 92, Tunis

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Perotti R (1996) Income distribution, political instability and investment. Eur Econ Rev 40(6):1203–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon N, Cochrane D, Woodcraft S (2012) Creating strong communities: how to measure the social sustainability of new housing developments. Berekeley Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy LV (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce JK, Narain S, Stanton EA (2007) Reclaiming nature: environmental justice and ecological restoration. Athem Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederman LE, Nils BW, Kristian SG (2011) Horizontal inequalities and ethno nationalist civil war: a global comparison. Am Polit Sci Rev 105(3):478–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy L, Gertz G (2011) Poverty in numbers: the changing state of global poverty from 2005 to 2015. Brooking Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P (2007) The bottom billion, Oxford. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P, Hoeffler A (2002) Aid policy and growth in post-conflict societies. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific ESCAP (2014) annual report, ESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira FHG, Gignoux J (2007) Inequality of economic opportunity in Latin America. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith J (2012) Inequality and instability, Oxford\New York. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) (2009) Ecosystem resilience. Great Barrier Reef Outlook report, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehan S, Umana A (2003) Environment-poverty nexus. Dev Policy J 3:53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Keese, M (Ed) (2006) Live longer, work longer. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Krawczyk J, Pharo A, Serea OS, Sinclair SD (2013) Computation of viability kernels: a case study of by-catsh fisheries. Comput Manag Sci 10(4):365–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 65:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent E (2015) Social-ecology: exploring the missing link in sustainable development. Standard University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Calva LF, Lustig N, Scott J, Castaneda A (2012) Cash transfers and public spending on education and health in Mexico 1992–2010: impact on inequality and poverty. Mimeo. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B (2012) Evolution of global inequality: from class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Global Pol 3(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger EW, Auvinen J (2002) Economic development, inequality, war and state violence. World Dev 30(2):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris ED, Kochhar K, Suphaphiphat N, Ricka F, Tsounta E (2015) Causes and consequences of income inequality: a global perspective. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • ParisOstrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Natl Acad Sci Proc 104 (39): 15181:15187

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma JG (2011) Homogeneous middles vs. heterogeneous tails and the end of the ‘Inverted-U’: the share of the rich is what it’s all about. Dev Chang 42(1):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pottebaum D (2002) Economic and social welfare in war-affected societies. Cornel University, Ithaca/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P (2004) Political ecology. A critical introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Malden MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa Fe Institute (SFI) (2012) www.santafe.edu/about, an independent, not-for-profit research and education center, Santa Fe, New Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidaway JD (2013) Geography, globalization and the problematic of area studies. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(4):984–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart F (1993) War and underdevelopment: can economic analysis help reduce the costs? J Int Dev 5(4):357–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (2012) The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future. Kindle edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Resilience Center (SRC) (2015) Applying resilience thinking: seven principles for building resilience in social-ecological systems, Stockholm University

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor G (2014) Viability: a priority criterion for the mitigation of climate change and other complex socio-ecological issues. J Futures Stud 19(1):77–96

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2012) Renewable resources and conflict, United Nations Interagency Framework Team for Preventive Action, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2013a) The Millennium development goals report, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, New York and Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2013b) Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity-Overview, Report on the world social situation, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2014) Investing in the SDGS: An action plan. World investment report, New York and Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2010) The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. Human development report, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2013) The rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. Human development report, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), World Resources Institute (2005) Sustaining the environment to fight poverty and achieve the MDGs: The economic case and priorities for action, prepared on behalf of the Poverty-Environment Partnership, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2005) Conflict, poverty, inequality, and economic, growth. Human development report, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) Conflict, Security, and Development Development Report. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016) Poverty and shared prosperity: taking on inequality, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (2014) Living planet report: species and spaces, people and places. Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amar, A. (2019). Building Socio-Ecological Coviability: An Efficient Way to Combat Poverty, Reduce Inequality and Address Insecurity Risks. In: Behnassi, M., Gupta, H., Pollmann, O. (eds) Human and Environmental Security in the Era of Global Risks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92828-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics