Advertisement

Fishes of the Drava River

Chapter
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

The chapter presents the fish fauna of the Croatian-Hungarian section of the river by overview the fish faunistic literature of studies conducted between 1992 and 2016, provides an example for littoral fish assemblages, and evaluates the ecological status of a river reach on this basis. It seems that 66 fishes, most of them belong to the family Cyprinidae and one cyclostomata species occur in the studied river section. However, the number of species regularly inhabiting the Croatian-Hungarian section could be about 51, because some species require different habitat type than the main channel of the studied section, or they are not able to reach the studied section due to migration barriers. There are also some taxa with unclear taxonomic status. Twenty-two species are listed in one of the annexes of the European Union Habitats Directive. The ratio of native to non-native species is 52:15. Monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis) and western tubenose goby (Proterorhinus semilunaris), two non-native Ponto-Caspian gobies, appear to be among the most abundant fishes in the littoral zone. Recently, other goby species (Ponticola kessleri, and N. melanostomus) formerly not known from the Drava have been found at the lower end of the studied river section and results anticipate their potential future spreading upstream. Fish assemblages tend to mirror an overall good ecological status and the rich fish fauna is of considerable nature conservation value due to the minimum alteration of habitats and the relative geographical proximity of the Danube. Therefore, for an effective conservation of the fish fauna the actual seminatural status of the Drava riverscape is to be maintained.

Keywords

Biodiversity Fish faunistics Non-native species Ecological connectivity Ecological status 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author thanks András Specizár and Tibor Erős for their essential help in field survey and Zoltán Sallai for his valuable remarks to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Agapow P-M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Crandall KA, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, Marshall JC, Purvis A (2004) The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q Rev Biol 79(2):161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antal L, László B, Kotlík P, Mozsár A, Czeglédi I, Oldal M, Kemenesi G, Jakab F, Nagy SA (2016) Phylogenetic evidence for a new species of in the Danube River basin. Mol Phylogenet Evol 96:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter RM (1977) Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8(1):255–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and floraGoogle Scholar
  5. Csipkés R, Szatmári L, Soós N (2012) Nyugati pikó (Gasterosteus gymnurus) a Drávában. Halászat 105(1):17–18 (in Hungarian)Google Scholar
  6. Erős T, Campbell Grant EH (2015) Unifying research on the fragmentation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats: patches, connectivity and the matrix in riverscapes. Freshw Biol 60(8):1487–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erős T, Sevcsik A, Tóth B (2005) Abundance and night-time habitat use patterns of Ponto-Caspian gobiid species (Pisces, Gobiidae) in the littoral zone of the River Danube, Hungary. J Appl Ichthyol 21(4):350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EEC. Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official J European Communities, Luxemburg L327:1–71Google Scholar
  9. Harka Á (1992) A Dráva halai. Halászat 85(1):9–12 (in Hungarian)Google Scholar
  10. Jelić M, Jelić D, Žutinić P, Ćaleta M (2012) Značajke faune riba donjeg toka rijeke Drave i okolnih poplavih staništa kod donjeg miholjca (istočna Hrvatska) (Fish fauna of the lower reaches of the River Drava and surrounding marshland habitats near Donji Miholjac, Eastern Croatia). Croatian J Fisheries 70(4):153–167 (In Croatian with English abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Karr JR (1981) Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karr JR (1991) Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol Appl 1(1):66–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kottelat M, Freyhof J (2007) Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Publications Kottelat, Cornol and Freyhof, Berlin, 646 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Majer J (1995) Adatok a Dráva halfaunájához és egyes holtágak vízminőségéhez (Data to the fish fauna [Pisces] of Dráva river [Hungary] and to the quality of backwaters). Dunántúli Dolgozatok Természettudományi Sorozat 8:189–202 (in Hungarian with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Majer J (1998) Adatok a Dráva és a Dráva menti területek hal-, kétéltű- és hüllőfaunájához (Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia) (Contributions to data on the fish, amhibian and reptile fauna [Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia] of river Dráva and adjacent areas). Dunántúli Dolgozatok Természettudományi Sorozat 9:431–440 (in Hungarian with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Majer J, Bordács M (2001) A Dráva magyarországi felső szakaszának természetvédelmi értékelése halfauna alapján [Conservation status of fish fauna in the upper part of the Dráva river in Hungary]. Természetvédelmi Közlemények 9:251–263 (in Hungarian with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  17. Manné S, Poulet N, Dembski S (2013) Colonisation of the Rhine basin by non-native gobiids: an update of the situation in France. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 411:02.  https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendel J, Lusk S, Vasil’eva ED, Vasil’ev VP, Lusková V, Ekmekci FG, Erk’akan F, Ruchin A, Koščo J, Vetešník L, Halačka K, Šanda R, Pashkov AN, Reshetnikov SI (2008) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Gobio Cuvier, 1816 (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) and its contribution to taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47(3):1061–1075Google Scholar
  19. Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH (2016) Fishes of the world, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perdices A, Bohlen J, Šlechtová V, Doadrio I (2016) Molecular evidence for multiple origins of the European spined loaches (Teleostei, Cobitidae). PLOS ONE 11(1):e0144628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perdices A, Doadrio I, Economidis PS, Bohlen J, Bǎnǎrescu P (2003) Pleistocene effects on the European freshwater fish fauna: double origin of the cobitid genus Sabanejewia in the Danube basin (Osteichthyes: Cobitidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 26(2):289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Povž M (2011) Distribution and conservation status of the lampreys in Slovenia. Bulletin Lampetra VII:84–91Google Scholar
  23. Povž M, Šumer S (2005) A brief review of non-native freshwater fishes in Slovenia. J Appl Ichthyol 21:316–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roche KF, Janač M, Jurajda P (2013) A review of Gobiid expansion along the Danube-Rhine corridor – geopolitical change as a driver for invasion. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 411:01.  https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sallai Z (2002a) A Dráva-Mura vízrendszer halfaunisztikai vizsgálata (Fish faunistical investigation of the Drava-Mura river system) I. Halászat 95(2):80–91. http://www.nimfea.hu/tagszervezeteink/halfaunisztika/drava1.htm (in Hungarian)
  26. Sallai Z (2002b) A Dráva-Mura vízrendszer halfaunisztikai vizsgálata II. Fajlista, következtetések (Fish faunistical investigation of the Drava-Mura river system II. Species list and conclusions). Halászat 95(3)3:119–140. http://www.nimfea.hu/tagszervezeteink/halfaunisztika/drava2.htm (in Hungarian)
  27. Sallai Z (2004) A Dráva folyó és hazai vízrendszerének halfaunája (Fish fauna in the Drava and its tributaries in Hungary). In: Sallai Z (ed) Mit veszíthetünk a Drávára tervezett horvát erőművel? (What can we lose with the planned hydropower plant on the Drava). Nimfea Természetvédelmi Egyesület, Túrkeve, pp 42–68 (in Hungarian with an English summary)Google Scholar
  28. Sallai Z (2016) Inváziós gébfajok megjelenése a Drávában (Invasive goby species in the Drava). Halászat 109(2):14 (in Hungarian)Google Scholar
  29. Sallai Z, Kontos T (2008) Data to the fish fauna of Croatian Drava sections. In: Purger JJ (ed) Biodiversity studies along the Drava river. University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, p 328Google Scholar
  30. Sallai Z, Kontos Z (2005) Fishfaunistical monitoring of the Hungarian part of the River Drava (1999–2004). Natura Somogyiensis 7:75–104Google Scholar
  31. Sály P, Erős T (2016) Vízfolyások ökológiai állapotminősítése halakkal: minősítési indexek kidolgozása (Ecological assessment of running waters in Hungary: compilation of biotic indices based on fish). Pisces Hungarici 10:15–45 (in Hungarian with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  32. Szalóky Z, György ÁI, Tóth B, Sevcsik A, Specziár A, Csányi B, Szekeres J, Erős T (2014) Application of an electrified benthic frame trawl for sampling fish in a very large European river (the Danube River) – Is offshore monitoring necessary? Fish Res 151:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Szalóky Z, Bammer V, György ÁI, Pehlivanov L, Schabuss M, Zornig H, Weiperth A, Erős T (2015) Offshore distribution of invasive gobies (Pisces: Gobiidae) along the longitudinal profile of the Danube River. Fund Appl Limnol 187(2):127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takács P (2012) Morphometric differentiation of gudgeon species inhabiting the Carpathian Basin. Annales de Limnologie—Int J Limnol 48(1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Takács P, Bihari P, Erős T, Specziár A, Szivák I, Bíró P, Csoma E (2014) Genetic heterogeneity reveals on-going speciation and cryptic taxonomic diversity of stream-dwelling gudgeons (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) in the Middle Danubian hydrosystem (Hungary). PLOS ONE 9(5):e97278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. The PLOS ONE Staff (2016) Correction: molecular evidence for multiple origins of the European spined loaches (Teleostei, Cobitidae). PLOS ONE 11(3):e0151228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151228
  37. Tóth B, Sevcsik A, Erős T (2007) Natura 2000-es halfajok elő fordulása a Duna hazai szakaszán (Occurrence of protected fishes of the Natura 2000 system in the Hungarian section of the Danube). Pisces Hungarici 2:83–94 (in Hungarian with an English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hydrobiology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of PécsPécsHungary

Personalised recommendations