Elective Modernism and the Politics of (Bio)Ethical Expertise
In this essay I consider whether the political perspective of third wave science studies – ‘elective modernism’ – offers a suitable framework for understanding the policy-making contributions that (bio)ethical experts might make. The question arises as a consequence of the fact that I have taken inspiration from the third wave in order to develop an account of (bio)ethical expertise. I offer a précis of this work and a brief summary of elective modernism before considering their relation. The view I set out suggests that elective modernism is a political philosophy and that although its use in relation to the use of scientific expertise in political and policy-making process has implications for the role of (bio)ethical expertise it does not, in the final analysis, provide an account that is appropriate for this latter form of specialist expertise. Nevertheless, it is an informative perspective, and one that can help us make sense of the political uses of (bio)ethical expertise.
- Bourdieu, P. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, H. 2010. Elective Modernism. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/contactsandpeople/harrycollins/expertise-project/elective%20modernism%204.doc. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
- Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- Evans, J.H. 2012. The History and Future of Bioethics: A Sociological View. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Evans, R. 2014. Science and Democracy in the Third Wave Elective modernism Not Epistocracy. In Expertise and Democracy, ed. C. Holst, 85–102. Oslo: ARENA, Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo https://sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/reports/2014/report-01-14.pdf#page=92. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. 1985. The value of life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lambek, M. 2010. Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
- Musschenga, A.W. 2015. Editorial: VIRTUAL ISSUE No. 1: Virtues, Skills, and Moral Expertise. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, (Virtual Issue, Online Only). http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/applied+ethics/journal/10677. Accessed 2 Feb 2015.
- Narvaez, D., and D.K. Lapsley. 2005. The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In Character Psychology and Character Education, ed. D.K. Lapsley and F.C. Power, 140–165. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- Radcliffe-Richards, J. 2012. The Ethics of Transplants: Why Careless Thought Costs Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, C. 2009. Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Snow, N.E. 2009. Virtue as Social Intelligence: An Empirically Grounded Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zigon, J. 2008. Morality: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar