Skip to main content

Adrenaline Versus Atropine for AVNRT Induction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arrhythmia Induction in the EP Lab
  • 865 Accesses

Abstract

AVNRT is the most frequent form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In French the term is TRIN (tachycardie par reentre intra-nodale) and in English AVNRT (atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia). It can be induced in the EP lab by atrial or ventricular stimulation in the basal state or after drug administration. The drug of choice is isoprenaline, but in some European countries, the lack of the drug produced efforts to search for another options. There is no study that compares efficacy of atropine versus adrenaline for AVNRT induction in the EP lab. In our study, we compared the two drugs in terms of efficacy and side effects. The investigators hypothesized that adrenaline would be a better and more convenient for the induction of arrhythmias since adrenaline is administered as an intravenous infusion over several minutes, in comparison to atropine, which is administered as a bolus. We demonstrated our hypothesis by statistical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akhtar M, Damato AN, Batsford WP, Caracta AR, Ruskin JN, Weisfogel GM, et al. Induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after atropine. Report of five cases. Am J Cardiol. 1975;36:286–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hariman RJ, Gomes JA, El-Sherif N. Catecholamine- dependent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1983;67:681–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu D. A-V nodal reentry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983;6:1190–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YH, Leitch JW, Klein GJ, Yee R, Leather RA. Effect of atropine and isoproterenol on tachycardia induction in asymptomatic patients with Wolff- Parkinson-White electrocardiographic pattern. Can J Cardiol. 1992;8:716–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cismaru G, Rosu R, Muresan L, Puiu M, Andronache M, Hengan E, et al. The value of adrenaline in the induction of supraventricular tachycardia in the EP lab. Europace. 2014;16:1634–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Toda I, Kawahara T, Murakawa Y, Nozaki A, Kawakubo K, Inoue H, et al. Electrophysiological study of young patients with exercise related paroxysmal of palpitation: role of atropine and isoprenaline for initiation of supraventricular tachycardia. Br Heart J. 1989;61:268–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huycke EC, Lai WT, Nguyen NX, Keung EC, Sung RJ. Role of intravenous isoproterenol in the electrophysiological induction of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in patients with dual atrioventricular node pathways. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64(18):1131–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brembilla- Perrot B, Terrier de la Chaise A, Pichene M, Aliot E, Cherrier F, Pernot C. Isoprenaline as an aid to the induction of catecholamine dependent supraventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation. Br Heart J. 1989;61:348–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stellbrink C, Diem B, Schauerte P, Brehmer K, Schuett H, Hanrath P. Differential effects of atropine and isoproterenol on inducibility of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2001;5:463–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz DF, Hegeman TW, Aleong R. Use of isoproterenol for assessment of anterograde accessory pathway conduction properties in sedated asymptomatic patients with ventricular pre-excitation. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manage. 2013;4:1428–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oral H, Crawford T, Frederick M, Gadeela N, Wimmer A, Dey S, et al. Inducibility of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by isoproterenol and its relation to the mode of onset of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:466–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katritsis DG, Camm AJ. Classification and differential diagnosis of atrio-ventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace. 2006;8:29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Asamoah, J. (2019). Adrenaline Versus Atropine for AVNRT Induction. In: Cismaru, G. (eds) Arrhythmia Induction in the EP Lab. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92729-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92729-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92728-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92729-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics