Skip to main content

Multimodality in Memes: A Cyberpragmatic Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Digital Discourse

Abstract

In this chapter, a corpus of 100 instances of a specific type of meme, image macro (the one typically made up of one top and one bottom stretch of text and a picture in-between), is analyzed in its multimodal quality, specifically in search of different categories that these memes might fit into depending on the relationship existing between picture and text and its impact on the quality of the eventual interpretation. An underlying assumption in the chapter, broadly within a cyberpragmatic framework (F. Yus, Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context, John Benjamins, 2011), is that different text-picture combinations will have an impact on eventual relevance by yielding different balances of cognitive effects and mental effort, the latter sometimes compensated for by an offset of additional cognitive effects in the shape of implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Image. Music. Text. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, E. (2011). Integrating visual and verbal meaning in multimodal text comprehension: Towards a model of intermodal relations. In S. Dreyfus, S. Hood, & S. Stenglin (Eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities (pp. 144–167). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, N. (2013). Beyond word balloons and thought bubbles: The integration of text and image. Semiotica, (197), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0079

  • Conradie, M., Brokensha, S., & Pretorius, M. (2012). No small irony: A discourse analysis of Zapiro’s 2010 World Cup cartoons. Language Matters, 43(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2011.649777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, M. (2016). I has seen image macros!’ Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes. International Journal of Communication, 10, 660–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Refaie, E., & Hörschelmann, K. (2010). Young people’s readings of a political cartoon and the concept of multimodal literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forceville, C. (2014). Relevance theory as a model for analyzing visual and multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forceville, C., & Clark, B. (2014). Can pictures have explicatures? Linguagem em (Dis)curso (special issue on relevance theory), 14(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140301-0114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2002). Visual and verbal playmates: An exploration of visual and verbal modalities in children’s picture books. Unpublished BA (Hons) thesis, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2016). Multimodal analysis. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), Handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 69–84). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardaş, T. (2012). No laughing matter: Visualizing Turkey’s Ergenekon in political cartoons. Middle East Critique, 21(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2012.688587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laineste, L., & Voolaid, P. (2016). Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes. European Journal of Humour Research, 4(4), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim Fei, V. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 220–246). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salway, A., & Martinec, R. (2002). Some ideas for modelling image-text combinations. Guildford: University of Surrey, Department of Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarapik, V. (2009). Picture, text, and imagetext: Textual polylogy. Semiotica, 174(1/4), 277–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segev, E., Nissenbaum, A., Stolero, N., & Shifman, L. (2015). Families and networks of Internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckl, H. (2004). In between modes: Language and image in printed media. In E. Ventola, C. Charles, & M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on multimodality (pp. 9–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taecharungroj, V., & Nueangjamnong, P. (2014). The effect of humour on virality: The study of Internet memes on social media. Paper presented at 7th International Forum on Public Relations and Advertising Media Impacts on Culture and Social Communication, Bangkok, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifonas, P. P. (2015). Text and images. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1139–1152). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakona, V. (2009). Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Word and image. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 668–682). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2015). Multimodality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 447–465). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language, 21(3), 404–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00284.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. (2014). A multimodal analysis of image-text relations in picture books. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1415–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (1997). La teoría de la relevancia y la estrategia humorística de la incongruencia-resolución. Pragmalingüística, 3–4, 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2010). Relevance theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 679–701). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2013a). An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & B. Alvarado (Eds.), Irony and humor: Highlights and genres (pp. 59–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2013b). Analyzing jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 9(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2013-0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2016). Humour and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2017). Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes. Lingua, 197, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is part of the research project PROMETEO 2016/052, titled “Humor gender: Observatory of identity of women and men through humor”, funded by the Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria d’Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Sport.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Yus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yus, F. (2019). Multimodality in Memes: A Cyberpragmatic Approach. In: Bou-Franch, P., Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (eds) Analyzing Digital Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92662-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92663-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics