Abstract
In this chapter, a corpus of 100 instances of a specific type of meme, image macro (the one typically made up of one top and one bottom stretch of text and a picture in-between), is analyzed in its multimodal quality, specifically in search of different categories that these memes might fit into depending on the relationship existing between picture and text and its impact on the quality of the eventual interpretation. An underlying assumption in the chapter, broadly within a cyberpragmatic framework (F. Yus, Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context, John Benjamins, 2011), is that different text-picture combinations will have an impact on eventual relevance by yielding different balances of cognitive effects and mental effort, the latter sometimes compensated for by an offset of additional cognitive effects in the shape of implications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barthes, R. (1977). Image. Music. Text. London: Fontana.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chan, E. (2011). Integrating visual and verbal meaning in multimodal text comprehension: Towards a model of intermodal relations. In S. Dreyfus, S. Hood, & S. Stenglin (Eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities (pp. 144–167). London: Continuum.
Cohn, N. (2013). Beyond word balloons and thought bubbles: The integration of text and image. Semiotica, (197), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0079
Conradie, M., Brokensha, S., & Pretorius, M. (2012). No small irony: A discourse analysis of Zapiro’s 2010 World Cup cartoons. Language Matters, 43(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2011.649777
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dynel, M. (2016). I has seen image macros!’ Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes. International Journal of Communication, 10, 660–688.
El Refaie, E., & Hörschelmann, K. (2010). Young people’s readings of a political cartoon and the concept of multimodal literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679719
Forceville, C. (2014). Relevance theory as a model for analyzing visual and multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C., & Clark, B. (2014). Can pictures have explicatures? Linguagem em (Dis)curso (special issue on relevance theory), 14(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140301-0114
Gill, T. (2002). Visual and verbal playmates: An exploration of visual and verbal modalities in children’s picture books. Unpublished BA (Hons) thesis, University of Sydney.
Jewitt, C. (2016). Multimodal analysis. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), Handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 69–84). Abingdon: Routledge.
Kardaş, T. (2012). No laughing matter: Visualizing Turkey’s Ergenekon in political cartoons. Middle East Critique, 21(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2012.688587
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Laineste, L., & Voolaid, P. (2016). Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes. European Journal of Humour Research, 4(4), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste
Lim Fei, V. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 220–246). London: Continuum.
Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928
McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Harper Collins.
Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313
Salway, A., & Martinec, R. (2002). Some ideas for modelling image-text combinations. Guildford: University of Surrey, Department of Computing.
Sarapik, V. (2009). Picture, text, and imagetext: Textual polylogy. Semiotica, 174(1/4), 277–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.03
Segev, E., Nissenbaum, A., Stolero, N., & Shifman, L. (2015). Families and networks of Internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12120
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Stöckl, H. (2004). In between modes: Language and image in printed media. In E. Ventola, C. Charles, & M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on multimodality (pp. 9–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Taecharungroj, V., & Nueangjamnong, P. (2014). The effect of humour on virality: The study of Internet memes on social media. Paper presented at 7th International Forum on Public Relations and Advertising Media Impacts on Culture and Social Communication, Bangkok, August.
Trifonas, P. P. (2015). Text and images. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1139–1152). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_53
Tsakona, V. (2009). Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003
van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Word and image. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 668–682). Abingdon: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (2015). Multimodality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 447–465). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language, 21(3), 404–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00284.x
Wu, S. (2014). A multimodal analysis of image-text relations in picture books. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1415–1420.
Yus, F. (1997). La teoría de la relevancia y la estrategia humorística de la incongruencia-resolución. Pragmalingüística, 3–4, 497–508.
Yus, F. (2010). Relevance theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 679–701). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2013a). An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & B. Alvarado (Eds.), Irony and humor: Highlights and genres (pp. 59–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2013b). Analyzing jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 9(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2013-0002
Yus, F. (2016). Humour and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2017). Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes. Lingua, 197, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002
Acknowledgments
This chapter is part of the research project PROMETEO 2016/052, titled “Humor gender: Observatory of identity of women and men through humor”, funded by the Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria d’Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Sport.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yus, F. (2019). Multimodality in Memes: A Cyberpragmatic Approach. In: Bou-Franch, P., Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (eds) Analyzing Digital Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92662-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92663-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)