Skip to main content

Priority, Reception, and Rehabilitation of Simon Marius: From the Accusation of Plagiarism to the Marius-Portal as His Virtual Collected Works

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 288 Accesses

Part of the book series: Historical & Cultural Astronomy ((HCA))

Abstract

Although he was the margravial court astronomer in Ansbach and was responsible for at least three notable achievements in the history of astronomy, the history of science has paid little attention to Simon Marius. Outside of the Netherlands, Marius may have been the first-ever professional astronomer to hear about the telescope, which was only presented to the world in September 1608. He claimed to have independently devised the Tychonic world system, and he observed the moons of Jupiter at roughly the same time as Galileo. Of course, there are reasons for this lack of attention. Marius could begin to exploit his early knowledge of the telescope only when his patron was able to purchase one. Tycho Brahe had already published his geo-heliocentric system years earlier, and whereas Galileo Galilei published his observations of the Jupiter moons in 1610, Marius first published in 1614, bringing down a charge of plagiarism on his head. The accusation of plagiarism was largely accepted by contemporary astronomers, and Marius had to wait until the early twentieth century before the quality of his telescopic observations and their independence were finally proved. His opus magnum was therefore translated comparatively late and only into very few languages. Many of his other writings and calendars remained difficult to access until the Marius-Portal was launched in 2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Ernst Wohlwill’s research in the Frankfurt archives, the Frankfurt Autumn Fair started on the 12th of September in 1608.Wohlwill II, 1926/1969, appendix III, p. 347. Hermann Grotefeld (1891) says it closed on 8th of September: “unser frauwen tag so der alden messe uslutet (Frankf. Stadtarch.), da am 8. Sept. die alte Messe ausgeläutet wird, die am 15. Aug. eingeläutet war,” p. 69. Opposed to this we find in Johann Philipp Orths Ausfürliche Abhandlung von den berümten zwoen Reichsmessen so in der Reichsstadt Frankfurt am Main järlich gehalten werden (Orth 1765) the assumption that the Autumn Fair began first on 8th of September: “Aus welchem iezoangefürten gar deutlich zu erkennen, daß dieser vor alters übliche gebrauch, besonders bei der herbstmesse, daß sie auf Marienhimmelfart ein- und Mariengeburt ausgeläutet worden, ongeachtet diese messe, nach obangezogenen ser warscheinlichen gründen, von gar langen zeiten her, nach leztem festtage, erst ihren anfang genommen und noch iezo nimt, meistens beibehalten worden sei, gleichwie solcher noch, bis auf den heutigen tag, mithin über 250. jare, unverrückt vortwäret,” p. 546. For further information of the dating, see the chapter contributed by Dick (Chap. 3) in this volume.

  2. 2.

    Girolamo Fracastoro (ca. 1478–1553) described already in Fracastoro (1538) Homocentrica (sig.18v) that two lenses in series let the image appear larger and closer. Other conceptual designs utilize a mirror and a lens.

  3. 3.

    Or the reprint, which appeared by Jean Gazeau in Lyon in November 1608.

  4. 4.

    Sarpi to Castrino, 9th of December 1609, in: Busnelli (1928, p. 1069); reprinted in Sarpi (1931, p. 15).

  5. 5.

    Galilei (1610/1989, p. 37). Galilei reported this to Benedetto Landucci dated 29th of August 1609 also, and regarding the sequence of events, in slightly altered form in Il Saggiatore (1623).

  6. 6.

    Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo, Tolemaico e Copernicano, Galilei (1632, p. 337): “Fù il primo scopritore, & osseruatore delle Macchie solari, si come di tutte l’altre nouità celesti, il nostro academico Linceo; e queste scopers’ egli l’anno 1610”

  7. 7.

    About Schmidner, see the chapter by Gaab (Chap. 2) in this book.

  8. 8.

    Cf. Kepler (1609); there have been pretelescopic observations in Europe as well as in China for two millennia.

  9. 9.

    Prog. 1613, sig. A3r: “Das erste ist nun / dass ich auch vermerket / daß Mercurius gleicher weise von der Sonnen erleuchtet werde / wie die Venus vnnd der Monn”.

  10. 10.

    Marius (1614), sig. E2v; Marius (1614/1988, p. 132): “Verum observationes meæ … Iovem non terram sed Solem pro centro habere”; similar Marius (1614), sig. B3v; Marius (1614/1988, p. 84).

  11. 11.

    See the chapters by Graney and Leich (Chaps. 8 and 9) in this book.

  12. 12.

    Kepler XVI (1954) (Letters 1607–1611), p. 383: “Tertio demonstrabo, Venerem non secus illuminari à Sole ac Lunam eamque corniculatam διχότομον etc. reddi, prout à fine anni superioris usque in Aprilem praesentis, à me ope perspicilli belgici multoties et diligentissimè obseruata et uisa est […]”.

  13. 13.

    “Jovis Comitatus admirabilis ab hinc paucis annis D. Galilaeo Mathematico Italo praestante solertissime primum detectus, (frustra enim feroque nimis contrarium Calvinianus quidem hoc primum anno & importune satis persuadere conatur) in sui admirationem totum Astronomorum gymnasium merito rapuit.”

  14. 14.

    “Questo istesso, quattro anni dopo la publicazione del mio Nunzio Sidereo, avvezzo a volersi ornar dell’altrui fatiche, non si è arrossito nel farsi autore delle cose da me ritrovate ed in quell’opera publicate; e stampando sotto titolo di Mundus Iovialis etc., ha temerariamente affermato, sé aver avanti di me osservati i pianeti Medicei, che si girano intorno a Giove.” Il Saggiatore, Rom 1623, sig. A2r/p. 3.

  15. 15.

    Marius (1614), sig. C2v; Marius (1614/1988, p. 96): “juxta Calendarium Iulianum”.

  16. 16.

    Marius (1614), sig. E4r; Marius (1614/1988, p. 138): “Annum & diem ordior à media nocte pręcedente Calendas Ianuarij, more Romano, quem etiam Reniholdus in suis tabulis retinuit”.

  17. 17.

    “Le operazioni del compasso geometrico, et militare”; in Galilei II (1965, pp. 363–424). It follows Capras’s text (pp. 425–511) and “Difesa di Galileo Galilei … Contro alle Calumnie & imposture di Baldessar Capra.” Venestra: Tomaso Baglioni 1607 (pp. 513–601).

  18. 18.

    “[…] e subito, forse per fuggir il castigo, se n’andò alla patria sua, lasciando il suo scolare, come si dice, nelle peste; contro il quale mi fu forza, in assenza di Simon Mario […].” Il Saggiatore, sig. A2r/p. 3.

  19. 19.

    Fabricius, David: Prognostikon auf 1615.

  20. 20.

    Oudemans and Bosscha (1903, p. 115): “les accusations de Galilée n’ont aucun fondemet sérieux”.

  21. 21.

    Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, Edizione Nazionale sotto gli auspicii di Sua Maestà il Re d’Italia, I–XX, Firenze (G. Barbèra Editrice) 1890–1909.

  22. 22.

    Oudemans and Bosscha (1903, p. 139): “De plus, l’astronome allemand avait donné une explication du mouvement en latitude, dont Galilée n’avait donné aucune raison plausible …”; cf. p. 147f. and 162.

  23. 23.

    Oudemans and Bosscha (1903, p. 155): “Mais les valeurs mêmes publiées par Marius suffisent pour démontrer qu’elles sont bien le résultat de ses propres observations.”

  24. 24.

    Oudemans and Bosscha (1903, p. 157): Par contre, il eut égard à la ‘parallaxe’, c’est à dire à la différence entre les directions Jupiter-Soleil et Jupiter-Terre, dont aucune mention n’avait été faite dans les écrits de Galilée, ce qui à lui seul offre une preuve de l’orginalité du travail de Marius.”

  25. 25.

    “Simon Marius aus Gunzenhausen und Galileo Galilei. Ein Versuch zur Entscheidung der Frage über den wahren Entdecker der Jupitertrabanten und ihrer Perioden” was ready in 1904 and published in Abhandlungen der mathematisch-physikalischen Klasse der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 22 (1906), II. Abt., München 1906, pp. 385–526.

  26. 26.

    Wohlwill’s first volume has the title “Bis zur Verurteilung der copernicanischen Lehre durch die römischen Kongregationen” (Till the condemnation of the Copernican doctrine by the Roman Congregation), Hamburg/Leipzig 1909, and appeared posthumously in Vol. 2 “Nach der Verurteilung der copernicanischen Lehre durch das Dekret von 1616” (Following the condemnation of the Copernican Doctrine through the Decree of 1616), Leipzig 1926, with appendix III, pp. 343–426.

  27. 27.

    Wohlwill I, 1926/1969, unnumbered, penultimate page of the foreword: “Es scheint uns heute, als sei dieses Bild in etwas zu harten Konturen gezeichnet. Die Kirche etwa und ihre speziellen-auch internen-Probleme wirken heute differenzierter, als Wohlwill sie dargestellt hat”.

  28. 28.

    Cf. Favaro (1901), English translation: Favaro (1904); cf. also Favaro (1917–1918).

  29. 29.

    The copy in the Herzog August Library Wolfenbüttel is a second edition with a three-page appendix, which follows directly on from the errata. In this Marius defends himself against Scheiner’s attacks. Cf. Gaab and Leich (2014). In September 2017, the author was able to inspect the copy in the Library of the Evangelisches Predigerseminar in Wittenberg, which also contains this appendix.

  30. 30.

    On the stage Anne Devries played the Cosmic Spirit “Canis Marsi”; Duke Meyer danced projections of the conference as “Prof. Din. Acreaur,” an expert from the planet Jupiter; Chriska Wagner played “Interstellar Geist” from Kepler’s early science fiction novel “Somnium–der Traum”; and Sigi Wekerle played Johannes Kepler’s favorite snowflake “Nix Nicis.” Staging was by Ingo Schweiger.

  31. 31.

    www.astronomie-nuernberg.de, Menu “Geschichte”.

  32. 32.

    Five calendars have disappeared and one is only preserved as fragments.

  33. 33.

    From January 13 to February 28 in the Gotische Halle des Stadhauses in Ansbach, the exhibition “Sonne Mond und Marius” (Sun, Moon, and Marius) took place. The State Library Ansbach (Schlossbibliothek) presented in cooperation with the town of Ansbach and the Ansbach Art Society, with items loaned from the town archives and the Margravial Museum “Die 4 Monde des Jupiter—die Entdeckung des Simon Marius in Anbach 1614–2014” (The 4 Moons of Jupiter – The Discovery of Simon Marius 1614–2014) from February 3 to March 4. From 17th to 30th of September lured the exhibition visitors “Fränkische Astronomen der Frühen Neuzeit” (Franconian Astronomers of the Early Modern Period) into the University Library Erlangen-Nuremberg. In the 20th of September, during the Marius Conference in the Planetarium Nuremberg, the roll-up displays from the traveling exhibition “Astronomie in der Metropolregion Nürnberg – Geschichte, Forschung und Volkssternwarten” (Astronomy in Nuremberg Metropolitan Region – History, Research and Public Observatories) for the International Year of Astronomy 2009 were on view, and Rudolph Pausenberger demonstrated the observational possibilities of the early seventeenth century with an exhibit on the Moons of Jupiter. For the 21st of February, the students of the Simon Marius Gymnasium had prepared an exhibition on the life and work of Marius. The student of the Beruflichen Oberschule Ansbach (BOS) (Occupational High School) developed the exhibition “Zum Jupiter aufblicken” (Looking Up to Jupiter), which could be viewed from March to July. Almost all of the year, “Sonne, Mond und Marius – Austellungen von Kinderkunstwerk” (Sun, Moon, and Marius – Exhibition of Children’s Art) from the Russian Youth Art School Obraz in Protvino near Moscow was on display. A large portrait of Marius remains in the Cosmonaut museum in Moscow through the mediation of the intercultural magazine Resonanz.

  34. 34.

    The Marius-Portal is much obliged to Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, Bibliothek des Evangelischen Predigerseminar, Wittenberg, Deutsches Museum, Emmy Riedel Buchdruckerei und Verlag, ETH-Bibliothek Zürich, Franckh-Kosmos Verlag, Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek Weimar, Landesbibliothek Coburg, NABI Verlag, Private collection Wolfgang Marius, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Ratsschulbibliothek Zwickau, Staatliche Bibliothek Ansbach, Stadt- und Schulbücherei Gunzenhausen, Stadtarchiv Ansbach, Stadtarchiv Gunzenhausen, Stadtarchiv Nürnberg, Jay and Naomi Pasachoff Collection, Stadtarchiv Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Stadtbücherei Ansbach, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt, Universitätsbibliothek Augsburg, Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsbibliothek Wien, Verlag Bayerische Staatszeitung, Verlag Harri Deutsch, Verlag Nürnberger Presse, and Verlag tredition.

References

  • Bosscha, Johannes (1907): Simon Marius. Réhabilitation d’un astronome calomnié, Archives Néerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, vol. 12 (1907), serie 2a, La Haye, pp. 258–307, 490–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Busnelli, Manlio Duilio (1928): Un Carteggio Inedito di Frau Paolo Sarpi con L’Ugonotto Francesco Castriono, Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 87, parte seconda (1927–28)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelmayr, Johann Gabriel (1730): Historische Nachricht von den Nürnbergischen Mathematicis und Künstlern. Nürnberg: Peter Conrad Monath 1730. Reprint Hildesheim: Olms 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, Antonio (1901): Galileo Galilei e Simone Mayr, Bibliotheca Mathematica, 3. Folge, 2 (1901), Leipzig, pp. 220–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, Antonio (1904): Galileo and Marius, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 27 (1904), pp. 199–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, Antonio (1918): A proposito di Simone Mayr, Atti e Memorie della R. Accademia di scienze, lettere ed arti in Padova, n.s. 34 (1917–18), pp. 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracastoro, Girolamo (1538): Homocentrica: Eiusdem de causis criticorum dierum per ea quae in nobis sunt. Venedig 1538

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaab, Hans; Leich, Pierre (2014): Marius’ Replik auf Scheiner. Der Anhang zum Mundus Iovialis von Simon Marius, Globulus – Beiträge der Natur- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft e.V., 18 (2014), pp. 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo (1623): Il saggiatore. Rom: Mascardi 1623

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo (1632): Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo, Tolemaico e Copernicano. Florenz: Landini 1632

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo (1965): Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, Vol. II, ed. by Antonio Segni. Florenz: Barbéra 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo (1965): Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, Vol. X, ed. by Antonio Segni. Florenz: Barbéra 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo (1610/1989): Sidereus Nuncius, or The Sidereal Messenger, translated with introduction, conclusion, and notes by Albert van Helden. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotefeld, Hermann (1891): Zeitrechnung des Deutschen Mittelalters und der Neuzeit, 1. Band: Glossar und Tafeln, Hannover 1891

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, Alexander von (1850): Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung, 3. Band, Kapitel 7, Stuttgart/Tübingen: Cotta 1850

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, Johannes (1609): Phaenomenon singulare seu Mercurius in Sole. Leipzig: Schurerus 1609

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, Johannes (1610): Dissertatio cum Nuncio Sidereo nuper ad mortales misso a Galilaeo Galilaeo Mathematico Patavino. Prag: Sedesanus 1610

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, Johannes (1938–2009): Gesammelte Werke, 21 vols. München: Beck 1938–2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug, Josef (1906): Simon Marius aus Gunzenhausen und Galileo Galilei: ein Versuch zur Entscheidung der Frage über den wahren Entdecker der Jupitertrabanten und ihrer Perioden, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 22 (1906), pp. 385–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Leich, Pierre; Wolfschmidt, Gudrun (2012): Simon Marius – Werke und Literatur. In: Wolfschmidt 2012, pp. 365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, William Thynne (1903a): Simon Marius and the satellites of Jupiter, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 26 (1903), London, pp. 254–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, William Thynne (1903b): Galilée et Marius, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 26 (1903), London, pp. 389–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, William Thynne (1904): Galileo and Marius, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 27 (1904), London, pp. 63–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, William Thynne (1909): Simon Mayr, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 32 (1909), London, pp. 355–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marius, Simon (1614): Mundus Iovialis Anno M.DC.IX. Detectus Ope Perspicilli Belgici. Nürnberg: Johann Lauer 1614

    Google Scholar 

  • Marius, Simon (1614/1916): Arthur Octavius Prickard: The ‘Mundus Jovialis’ of Simon Marius, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 39 (1916), part 1: no. 504 (September), pp. 367–381, part 2: no. 505 (October 1916), pp. 403–412, part 3: no. 506 (November 1916), pp. 443–452, part 4: no. 507 (December 1916), pp. 498–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Marius, Simon (1614/1988): Joachim Schlör, Mundus Iovialis – Die Welt des Jupiter. Gunzenhausen: Johann Schrenk 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Marius, Simon (1614/1916/2019): The World of Jupiter, translated by A.O. Prickard and Albert van Helden, in Simon Marius and his Research, Hans Gaab and Pierre Leich (eds.), Cham: Springer 201

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudemans, Jean Abraham Chrétien; Bosscha, Johannes (1903): Galilee et Marius, Archives Néerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, Ser. II, T. VIII, La Haye 1903, pp. 115–189

    Google Scholar 

  • [Orth, Johann Philipp:] Ausfürliche Abhandlung von den berümten zwoen Reichsmessen so in der Reichsstadt Frankfurt am Main järlich gehalten werden [...]. [Frankfurt am Main] 1765. Reprint: [Frankfurt am Main:] Brönner [ca. 1994]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz, Kurt (1977): 600 Jahre Astronomie in Nürnberg. Nürnberg: Hans Carl 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Prickard, Arthur Octavius (1917): Note on “Simon Marius” and the ‘Mundus Jovialis’, The Observatory. A review of astronomy 40 (1917), pp. 119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Radau, J. C. Rodolphe (1904): Revue des publications astronomiques. Oudemanns et Bosscha. – Galilée et Marius, Bulletin Astronomique, Serie I, vol. 21 (1904), Paris, pp. 119–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarpi, Fra Paolo (1931): Lettere ai Protestanti, ed. by Manlio Duilio Busnelli, Bari 1931, Volume secondo

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, Christoph; Locher, Johann Georg (Respondent) (1614): Disquisitiones Mathematicae, De Controversiis et Novitatibus Astronomicis. Ingolstadt: Angermaria 1614

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohmaier, Gotthard (1984): Die Sterne des Ab dar-Rahman as-Sufi. Hanau/Main: Müller & Kiepenheuer 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Willach, Rolf (2007): Der lange Weg zur Erfindung des Fernrohrs. In: Hamel, Jürgen; Keil, Inge: Der Meister und die Fernrohre: Das Wechselspiel zwischen Astronomie und Optik in der Geschichte (= Acta Historica Astronomiae; Vol. 33), Frankfurt a.M.: Harri Deutsch 2007, pp. 34–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, Emil (1926): Galilei und sein Kampf für die copernicanische Lehre, vol. 2. Leipzig: Leopold Voss 1909–1926. Reprint Wiesbaden: Sändig 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfschmidt, Gudrun (Ed.) (2012): Simon Marius, der fränkische Galilei, und die Entwicklung des astronomischen Weltbildes (= Nuncius Hamburgensis – Beiträge zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften; Band 16). Hamburg: tredition 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinner, Ernst (1942): Zur Ehrenrettung des Simon Marius, Vierteljahrsschrift der Astronomischen Gesellschaft 77 (1942), pp. 23–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinner, Ernst (1943): Entstehung und Ausbreitung der Copernicanischen Lehre, 2nd ed., München: Beck 1988 (first published Erlangen 1943)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidervaart, Huib (Ed.) (2008): Zoomers, Henk (transcribed, translated and introduced), Embassies of the King of Siam sent to His Excellency Prince Maurits, arrived in The Hague on 10 September 1608. An early 17 th century newsletter, reporting both the visit of the first Siamese diplomatic mission to Europe and the first documented demonstration of a telescope worldwide. Wassenaar: Louwman Collection of Historic Telescopes 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Leich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leich, P. (2018). Priority, Reception, and Rehabilitation of Simon Marius: From the Accusation of Plagiarism to the Marius-Portal as His Virtual Collected Works. In: Gaab, H., Leich, P. (eds) Simon Marius and His Research. Historical & Cultural Astronomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92621-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics