Advertisement

Norton Versus Callicott on Interpreting Aldo Leopold: A Jamesian View

  • Piers H. G. StephensEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 26)

Abstract

Since Bryan Norton first advocated an American pragmatist reading of Aldo Leopold’s work in 1988, he has been debating with J. Baird Callicott over interpretation of Leopold’s development of the land ethic. In this chapter I give an overview of this debate, defending the general outlines of Norton’s position by bringing in new interpretative work of my own. I argue firstly that Norton is correct to see a Jamesian pragmatist influence on Leopold, but maintain that this is best read as deriving from William James’ own work rather than from the secondary source, Arthur Twining Hadley, and that Norton may have exaggerated the immediacy and strength of the influence. Secondly, I demonstrate how strands of evidence suggest that Leopold read James, and that elements of James’ thought chimed with Leopold’s own perspective sufficiently to support Norton’s claim of a pragmatist influence. Thirdly, I show that aspects of Callicott’s interpretation of Leopold do not exclude a pragmatist reading, and argue that Callicott has misunderstood Jamesian pragmatism in ways that undermine his case. Finally, I suggest that Jamesian pragmatic naturalism has far more radical potential than Callicott allows, and that the wider framing of the debate within the environmental philosophy community as setting pragmatist managerialism against radical ethical innovation has itself been misleading. I conclude that Norton is correct to argue that the American pragmatist tradition is a powerful positive contributor to environmental philosophy and policy, provided that the breadth of pragmatic naturalism itself is sufficiently recognized across the board.

Keywords

Leopold Pragmatism Callicott Truth James Experience 

References

  1. Callicott, J.Baird. 2015. Introductory palinode. At http://jbcallicott.weebly.com/introductory-palinode.html. Accessed 28 June 2015.
  2. Callicott, J.Baird. 1989. The conceptual foundations of the land ethic. In Defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy, ed. J. Baird Callicott, 75–99. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. Callicott, J.Baird. 1999. Beyond the land ethic: More essays in environmental philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  4. Callicott, J.Baird. 2002. My Reply. In Land, value, community: Callicott and environmental philosophy, ed. Wayne Ouderkirk, and Jim Hill, 291–329. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Callicott, J.Baird. 2011. The worldview concept and Aldo Leopold’s project of ‘world view’ remediation. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture 5: 510–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callicott, J.Baird. 2013. Thinking like a planet: The land ethic and the earth ethic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Callicott, J.Baird, and Eric T. Freyfogle. 1999. Introduction. In For the health of the land, Aldo Leopold, ed. J. Baird Callicott and Eric T. Freyfogle, 3–26. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  8. Callicott, J.Baird, William Grove-Fanning, Jennifer Rowland, Daniel Baskind, Robert Heath French, and Kerry Walker. 2009. Was Aldo Leopold a pragmatist? Rescuing Leopold from the imagination of Bryan Norton. Environmental Values 18: 453–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callicott, J.Baird, William Grove-Fanning, Jennifer Rowland, Daniel Baskind, Robert Heath French, and Kerry Walker. 2011. Reply to Norton, re: Aldo Leopold and pragmatism. Environmental Values 20: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannavò, Peter F. 2012. Ecological citizenship, time, and corruption: Aldo Leopold’s green republicanism. Environmental Politics 21: 864–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dooley, Patrick Kieran. 1974. Pragmatism as humanism: The philosophy of William James. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Edie, James M. 1987. William James and phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frankenberry, Nancy. 1987. Religion and radical empiricism. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fuller, Robert C. 1992. American pragmatism reconsidered: William James’s ecological ethic. Environmental Ethics 14: 159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gale, Richard M. 1999. The divided self of William James. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodman, Russell B. 1990. American philosophy and the romantic tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hadley, Arthur Twining. 1913. Some influences on modern philosophic thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. James, William. 1912. Memories and studies. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  19. James, William. 1918. The principles of psychology, vol. 2. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. James, William. 1952. The varieties of religious experience. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  21. James, William. 1968. Pragmatism and four essays from the meaning of truth. Cleveland: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
  22. James, William. 1977. A Pluralistic Universe. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. James, William. 1979. The moral philosopher and the moral life. In The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy, ed. William James, 141–162. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. James, William. 2010. On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings. In The heart of William James, ed. Robert Richardson, 145–163. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lekan, Todd. 2012. A Jamesian approach to environmental ethics. Contemporary Pragmatism. 9: 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leopold, Aldo. 1921. The wilderness and its place in forest recreational policy. Journal of Forestry 19: 718–21.Google Scholar
  27. Leopold, Aldo. 2013. Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest. In Thinking like a planet: The land ethic and the earth ethic, ed. J. Baird Callicott, 303–311. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Leopold, Aldo. 1987. A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lorbiecki, Marybeth. 1996. Aldo Leopold: A fierce green fire. Montana: Helena and Billings.Google Scholar
  30. Meine, Curt. 1988. Aldo Leopold: His life and work. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, Joshua I. 1997. Democratic temperament: The legacy of William James. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  32. Millstein, Roberta A. 2015. Re-examining the Darwinian basis for Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Ethics, Policy and Environment 18: 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Minteer, Ben. 2006. The landscape of reform: Civic pragmatism and environmental thought in America. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Norton, Bryan G. 1996. The constancy of Leopold’s land ethic. In Environmental pragmatism, ed. Andrew Light, and Eric Katz. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Norton, Bryan G. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norton, Bryan G. 2011. What Leopold learned from Darwin and Hadley: Comment on Callicott. Environmental Values 20: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Norton, Bryan G. 2013. Leopold, Hadley and Darwin: Darwinian epistemology, truth and right. Contemporary Pragmatism 10: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ouspensky, P.D. 1965. Tertium organum: The third canon of thought. Translated by Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Perry, Ralph Barton. 1935. The thought and character of William James, vol. 2 Vols. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  41. Pryor, Ashley. 2011. Thinking like a mystic: The legacy of P.D. Ouspensky’s Tertium Organum on the development of Aldo Leopold’s ‘Thinking Like a Mountain’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture 5: 465–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Starkey, Charles. 2007. The land ethic, moral development and ecological rationality. Southern Journal of Philosophy XLV: 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stephens, Piers H.G. 2007. Sustainability, democracy and pragmatism: Bryan Norton’s philosophy of ecosystem management. Organization and Environment 20: 386–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephens, Piers H.G. 2009. Toward a Jamesian environmental philosophy. Environmental Ethics 31: 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephens, Piers H.G. 2012. The turn of the skew: Pragmatism, environmental philosophy and the ghost of William James. Contemporary Pragmatism 9: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, Bob Pepperman. 2002. Aldo Leopold’s Civic Education. In Democracy and the claims of nature, eds. Ben A Minteer and Bob Pepperman Taylor, 173–187. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations