Advertisement

Sustainable Change in a Fractured World

  • Paul D. HirschEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 26)

Abstract

Bryan Norton’s body of work—with its focus on public deliberation, appropriate and fair procedures for decision-making, and epistemological humility—offers a pathway to sustainable change in the context of social diversity and scientific uncertainty. Working towards sustainable change amidst the degree of political and social divisiveness we are seeing today, however, may call for additional levels of sensitivity: to the way problems and publics are constructed, and to one’s own embeddedness within the complex dynamics that comprise a problem’s context. When fractures are substantial, it may be unrealistic and even unproductive to assume that deliberative efforts will yield a unified notion of the public interest. In such cases, the challenge for leaders and facilitators is to identify opportunities for the protection of shared values, and to establish democratic spaces that allow conflicts to be engaged in ways that do not require the destruction or domination of adversaries.

Keywords

Polarization Uncertainty Leadership Sustainability Ethics 

References

  1. Hirsch, P.D., and B.G. Norton. 2012. Thinking like a planet. In Ethical adaptation to climate change: Human virtue of the future, ed. Allen Thompson and Jeremy Bendik-Keyme. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hirsch, P.D., J.P. Brosius, S. O’Connor, A. Zia, M. Welch-Devine, J.L. Dammert, A. Songorwa, T.C. Trung, J.L. Rice, Z.R. Anderson, S. Hitchner, J. Schelhas, and T.O. McShane. 2013. Navigating complex trade-offs in conservation and development: An integrative framework. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 31: 99–122.Google Scholar
  3. Kahan, D. 2012. Why we are poles apart on climate change. Nature 488: 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Leopold, Aldo. 1949. A sand County Almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Manno, Jack P., Paul Hirsch., and Andrea M. Feldpausch-Parker. 2014. Introduction by the Onondaga Nation and activist neighbors of an indigenous perspective on issues surrounding hydrofracking in the Marcellus Shale. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (1): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Minteer, B.A. (ed.). 2009. Nature in common? Environmental ethics and the contested foundations of environmental policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Mouffe, C. 2005. On the political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Norton, B.G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Norton, B.G. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Norton, B.G. 2015. Sustainable values, sustainable change: A guide to environmental decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pew Research Center. 2014. Political polarization in the American public. Available at http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/. Accessed September 8, 2017.
  12. Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S.E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E.M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S.R. Carpenter, W. De Vries, C.A. De Wit, C. Folke, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, G.M. Mace, L.M. Persson, V. Ramanathan, B. Reyers, and S. Sörlin. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (736): 1259855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stirling, A. 2010. Keep it complex. Nature 468: 1029–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vitek, B., and W. Jackson. 2008. Introduction: Taking ignorance seriously. In The virtues of ignorance: Complexity, sustainability, and the limits of knowledge, ed. B. Vitek and W. Jackson, 1–17. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  15. Zia, A., P. Hirsch, A. Songorwa, D.R. Mutekanga, S. O’Connor, T. McShane, P. Brosius, and B. Norton. 2011. Cross-scale value trade-offs in managing social-ecological systems: The politics of scale in Ruaha National Park, Tanzania. Ecology and Society 16 (4): 7.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04375-160407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations