Advertisement

Sustainability and the Currency of Intergenerational Obligations: Norton, Solow, Rawls, Mill, and Sen on Problems of Intergenerational Allocation

  • Clark WolfEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 26)

Abstract

Concepts of sustainability guide policy and environmental management decisions. But when goals are articulated badly, they provide poor decision guides, and may lead to serious mistakes. This paper reviews and critically evaluates a series of popular conceptions of ‘sustainability,’ with special focus on a conception advocated by Bryan Norton. While no conception of sustainability (not even Norton’s) is problem-free, we gain by understanding the limitations of each. Adaptive management, as I understand it here, is not a conception of sustainability, but a view about how conceptions of sustainability might be used in practical reasoning about policy or management.

Keywords

Adaptive management Capability theory Environmental management Sustainability Intergenerational justice Sufficientarianism Resource management 

References

  1. Arneson, Richard. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, Nelson Courtland. 1934. Logging: Principles and practices in the United States and Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Dworkin, Ronald. 1981a. What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10(3): 185–246.Google Scholar
  4. Dworkin, Ronald. 1981b. What is equality? Philosophy & Public Affairs 10(4): 283–345.Google Scholar
  5. Feinberg, J. 1992. Freedom and fulfillment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hartwick, J.M. 1977. Intergenerational equity and investing rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review 66: 972–974.Google Scholar
  7. Heap, B., and J. Kent. 2000. Towards sustainable consumption: A European perspective. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  8. Hohfeld, W.N. 1917. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 4378. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4378.
  9. Kahneman, Daniel and Deaton Angus. 2010. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(48).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mill, J.S. 1879. Principles of political economy. New York: Lee, Shepard, and Dillingham.Google Scholar
  11. Norton, Bryan. 1995. Evaluating ecosystem states: Two competing paradigms. Ecological Economics 14: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Norton, Bryan. 1999. Ecology and opportunity: Intergenerational equity and sustainable options. In Fairness and futurity, ed. Andrew Dobson. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Norton, Bryan. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Norton, Bryan. 2009. Ethics and sustainable development: An adaptive approach to environmental choice. In Handbook of sustainable development, ed. Giles Atkinson, T. Tietenberg, et al., 27–44. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Norton, Bryan. 2015. Sustainable values, sustainable change: A guide to environmental decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parfit, Derek. 1981. Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rainbolt, G. 2006. The concept of rights. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  20. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Solow, R.M. 1974. The economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 64: 1–14.Google Scholar
  22. Solow, R.M. 1993a. An almost practical step toward sustainability. Resources Policy (Sept 1993): 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solow, R.M. 1993b. Sustainability: An economist’s perspective. In Economics of the environment: Selected readings, ed. J. Gaus, R. Dorfman, and N. Dorfman, 179–187. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  24. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wolf, Clark. 1995. Contemporary property rights, Lockean Provisos, and the interests of future generations. Ethics 105(4): 791–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolf, Clark. 1996. Social choice and normative population theory: A person-affecting solution to Parfit’s Mere-addition paradox. Philosophical Studies 81(2–3): 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolf, Clark. 1997a. Person affecting utilitarianism and population; or, Sissy Jupe’s theory of social choice. In Contingent future persons, ed. J. Heller and N. Fotion, 99–122. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolf, Clark. 1997b. Property rights, economic inequalities, and international obligations. In Ethics in practice, ed. H. LaFollette, 559–570. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Wolf, Clark. 2004. O repugnance, where is thy sting? On the neutral level of existence and Parfit’s repugnant conclusion. In The repugnant conclusion, ed. J. Ryberg and T. Tännsjö, 61–80. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolf, Clark. 2009a. Do future persons presently have alternative possible identities? In Harming future persons, ed. M. Roberts and D. Wasserman. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Wolf, Clark. 2009b. Intergenerational justice, human needs, and climate policy. In Justice between generations, ed. A. Gosseries and L. Meyer, 347–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wolf, Clark. 2010. Intergenerational Justice and Saving. In Values, justice, and economics, ed. J. LaMont, K. Favor, and J. Gaus, 269–290. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wolf, Clark. 2012. Environmental ethics, future generations, and environmental law. In Routledge companion to the philosophy of law, ed. A. Marmour, 397–414. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Wolf, Clark. 2013. Intergenerational distributive justice. In Routledge companion to social and political philosophy, ed. J. Gaus and F. D’Agostino, 467–479. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Philosophy, Political Science, and Sustainable AgricultureIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations