Skip to main content

Sustainability and the Currency of Intergenerational Obligations: Norton, Solow, Rawls, Mill, and Sen on Problems of Intergenerational Allocation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Concepts of sustainability guide policy and environmental management decisions. But when goals are articulated badly, they provide poor decision guides, and may lead to serious mistakes. This paper reviews and critically evaluates a series of popular conceptions of ‘sustainability,’ with special focus on a conception advocated by Bryan Norton. While no conception of sustainability (not even Norton’s) is problem-free, we gain by understanding the limitations of each. Adaptive management, as I understand it here, is not a conception of sustainability, but a view about how conceptions of sustainability might be used in practical reasoning about policy or management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arneson, Richard. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Nelson Courtland. 1934. Logging: Principles and practices in the United States and Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1981a. What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10(3): 185–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1981b. What is equality? Philosophy & Public Affairs 10(4): 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. 1992. Freedom and fulfillment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J.M. 1977. Intergenerational equity and investing rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review 66: 972–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, B., and J. Kent. 2000. Towards sustainable consumption: A European perspective. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld, W.N. 1917. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 4378. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4378.

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Deaton Angus. 2010. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(48). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1879. Principles of political economy. New York: Lee, Shepard, and Dillingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bryan. 1995. Evaluating ecosystem states: Two competing paradigms. Ecological Economics 14: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bryan. 1999. Ecology and opportunity: Intergenerational equity and sustainable options. In Fairness and futurity, ed. Andrew Dobson. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bryan. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bryan. 2009. Ethics and sustainable development: An adaptive approach to environmental choice. In Handbook of sustainable development, ed. Giles Atkinson, T. Tietenberg, et al., 27–44. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bryan. 2015. Sustainable values, sustainable change: A guide to environmental decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 1981. Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainbolt, G. 2006. The concept of rights. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1974. The economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 64: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1993a. An almost practical step toward sustainability. Resources Policy (Sept 1993): 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1993b. Sustainability: An economist’s perspective. In Economics of the environment: Selected readings, ed. J. Gaus, R. Dorfman, and N. Dorfman, 179–187. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 1995. Contemporary property rights, Lockean Provisos, and the interests of future generations. Ethics 105(4): 791–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 1996. Social choice and normative population theory: A person-affecting solution to Parfit’s Mere-addition paradox. Philosophical Studies 81(2–3): 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 1997a. Person affecting utilitarianism and population; or, Sissy Jupe’s theory of social choice. In Contingent future persons, ed. J. Heller and N. Fotion, 99–122. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 1997b. Property rights, economic inequalities, and international obligations. In Ethics in practice, ed. H. LaFollette, 559–570. London: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 2004. O repugnance, where is thy sting? On the neutral level of existence and Parfit’s repugnant conclusion. In The repugnant conclusion, ed. J. Ryberg and T. Tännsjö, 61–80. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 2009a. Do future persons presently have alternative possible identities? In Harming future persons, ed. M. Roberts and D. Wasserman. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 2009b. Intergenerational justice, human needs, and climate policy. In Justice between generations, ed. A. Gosseries and L. Meyer, 347–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 2010. Intergenerational Justice and Saving. In Values, justice, and economics, ed. J. LaMont, K. Favor, and J. Gaus, 269–290. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 2012. Environmental ethics, future generations, and environmental law. In Routledge companion to the philosophy of law, ed. A. Marmour, 397–414. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Clark. 2013. Intergenerational distributive justice. In Routledge companion to social and political philosophy, ed. J. Gaus and F. D’Agostino, 467–479. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clark Wolf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wolf, C. (2018). Sustainability and the Currency of Intergenerational Obligations: Norton, Solow, Rawls, Mill, and Sen on Problems of Intergenerational Allocation. In: Sarkar, S., Minteer, B. (eds) A Sustainable Philosophy—The Work of Bryan Norton. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92597-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics