Advertisement

Ecological Sustainability

  • J. Baird CallicottEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 26)

Abstract

Sustainability is simply a property of an activity or complex system of activities capable of going on indefinitely. The concept of sustainability, however, is most often implicitly associated with human economic activities or complex systems of human economic activities that are constrained by environmental limits. From the perspective of current environmental concerns, the essentially economic concepts of sustainable yield and sustainable development are flawed. The former is strongly anthropocentric and has historically ignored ecological (and mathematical) complexity. The latter, while based on weak anthropocentrism, is also based on weak sustainability—artificial capital may be substituted for depleted natural capital; and thus the only things the present generation need bequeath to future generations are wealth and an entrepreneurial culture. Norton rejects weak sustainability, but also strong sustainability—the view that artificial capital cannot substitute for natural capital—championed by ecological economists and conservation biologists. Strong sustainability, according to Norton, is about “stuff,” while sustainable societies commit themselves to “to perpetuate place-based values and project them into the future.” Place-based values, however, are not always environmentally sound—think, for example, of coal-country values or desert-casino-country values. Alternatively, ecological sustainability conceives the human economy to be (as in fact it is) a subset of the economy of nature. The economy of nature is powered by solar energy and efficiently re-cycles materials. A sustainable human economy would thus pattern itself as microcosm to macrocosm on the economy of nature, lest growth of the former seriously disrupt the latter.

Keywords

Sustainability Sustainable yield Sustainable development Weak sustainability Strong sustainability Ecological sustainability Economy of nature 

References

  1. Agapow, P.-M., G.M. Mace, O.R. Biinda-Emons, and K.A. Crandall. 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity. Quarterly Review of Biology 79: 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, G. 2009. The agricultural revolution in prehistory: Why did foragers become farmers?. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, A. 2012. Reflections on sustainability and population growth. In On the brink: Environmentalists confront overpopulation, ed. P. Cafaro and E. Christ, 29–40. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  4. Botkin, D. 1990. Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Botkin, D. 2012. The moon in the nautilus shell: Discordant harmonies reconsidered. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bousquet, N., T. Duchesne, and L.P. Rivest. 2008. Redefining the maximum sustainable yield for the Schaefer population model including multiplicative environmental noise. Journal of Theoretical Biology 254: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabeza-Gutez, M. 1996. The concept of weak sustainability. Ecological Economics 17: 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callicott, J.B. 1994. Earth’s insights: A multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the mediterranean basin to Australian outback. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Callicott, J.B. 2013. Thinking like a planet: The land ethic and the earth ethic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Callicott, J.B. 2017. 12. What good is it, anyway?” In The routledge handbook of philosophy of biodiversity, ed. Justin Garson, Anya Plutynski and Sahotra Sarkar, 168–182. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Callicott, J.B., and R.T. Ames (eds.). 1989. Nature in Asian traditions of thought: Essays in environmental philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Callicott, J.B. and J. McRae (eds.). 2014. Environmental philosophy in Asian traditions of thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Callicott, J.B., and J. McRae. 2017. Japanese environmental philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callicott, J.B., J. van Buren, and K.W. Brown. 2018. Greek natural philosophy: The presocratics and their importance for current environmental philosophy. San Diego: Cognella Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Churchill, W. 2013. Churchill by himself: The definitive collection of quotations. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
  16. Common, M., and C. Perrings. 1992. Toward an ecological economics of sustainability. Ecological Economics 6: 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrenfeld, J. 2004. Can industrial ecology be the “science of sustainability”? Journal of Industrial Ecology 8: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, F.M. 1972. Gross substitutes and the utility function. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filatova, T., P.H. Vurburg, D.C. Parker, and C.A. Stanard. 2013. Spatial agenr-based models for socio-ecological systems. Environmental Modeling and Software 45: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodpaster, K.E., L.L. Nash, and H.C. deBettignies. 2006. Business ethics: Policies and persons, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  21. Grapard, A. 1984. Japan’s ignored cultural revolution: The separation of Shinto and Buddhist in Meiji: A case study. History of Religions 23: 240–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadley, A.T. 1913. Some influences in modern philosophical thought. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, W. 1980. New roots for agriculture. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jamieson, D. 2014. Reason in dark time: Why the struggle against climate change failed—and what it means for our future. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaza, Stephanie. 2014. Acting with compassion: Buddhism, feminism, and the environmental crisis. In Environmental philosophy in Asian traditions of thought, ed. J.B. Callicott, and J. McRae, 71–98. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kemp, W. 2006. Biodiesel: Basics and beyond. Tamworth, Ontario: Aztext.Google Scholar
  27. Korin, I., Y.J. Kaufman, R. Washington, M.C. Todd, J.V. Matins, and D. Rosenfeld. 2006. The Bodélé depression: A single spot in the Sahara that provides most of the mineral dust to the Amazon forest. Environmental Research Letters 1: 014005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lai, K.L. 2014. Conceptual foundations for environmental ethics: A Daoist perspective. In Environmental philosophy in Asian traditions of thought, ed. J.B. Callicott, and J. McRae, 173–195. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  29. Larkin, P.A. 1977. An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leopold, A. 1979. Some fundamentals of conservation in the southwest. Environmental Ethics 1: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Linnaeo, Carolo. 1749. Specimen Academicum de Oeconomi Naturae. Stockholm: Isacus J. Bieberg.Google Scholar
  32. Lovelock, J. 2006. The revenge of Gaia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. McCabe, G.J., M.A. Palecki, and J.L. Betancourt. 2004. Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multidecadal drought frequency in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 4136–4141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCarthy, C. 2006. The road. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  35. McKee, L. 2012. The human population footprint on global biodiversity. In On the brink: Environmentalists confront overpopulation, ed. p. Cafaro and E. Christ, 91–97. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nishimiya, H and K. Hiyashi. 2010. Reintroducing the Japanese crested Ibis in Sado. Japan: TEEBweb (Retrieved 30 Jan 2015).Google Scholar
  37. Norton, B.G. (ed.). 1986. The preservation of species. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Norton, B.G. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norton, B.G. 2015. Sustainable values, sustainable change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: The Clarendon Press of Oxford University.Google Scholar
  41. Pickett, S.T.A., V.T. Parker, and P.L. Fielder. 1992. The new paradigm in ecology: implications for conservation biology above the species level. In Conservation biology, ed. P.L. Fielder, and S.K. Jain, 50–65. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Pickett, S.T.A., and R.S. Ostfeld. 1995. The shifting paradigm in ecology. In A new century for natural resource management, ed. R.L. Knight, and S.F. Bates, 261–279. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  43. Randall, A. 1988. What mainstream economists have to say about biodiversity. In biodiversity, ed. E.O. Wilson, 217–223. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Robertson, M. 2013. Crash: A post-apocalyptic Tale. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
  45. Roudsepp-Hearne, C., G.D. Peterson, M. Tengö, E.M. Bennett, T. Holland, K. Benessaiah, G.K. McDonald, and L. Pfeifer. 2010. Untangling the environmentalist’s dilemma: Why is human well-being increasing while ecosystem services degrade? BioScience 60: 576–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schaefer, M.B. 1954. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bulletin of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission 1: 25–56.Google Scholar
  47. Serres, M. 1992. Le contrat naturel. Paris: Éditions Flammarion.Google Scholar
  48. Tansley, A.G. 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16: 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Totman, C. 1989. The green archipelago: Forestry in preindustrial Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Toyoda, M. 2013. Revitalizing local commons. Environmental Ethics 35: 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tucker, M.E. 2014. The relevance of Chinese neo-Confucianism for the reverence for nature. In Environmental philosophy in Asian traditions of thought, ed. J.B. Callicott, and J. McRae, 133–148. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  52. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  53. Walters, C., and J. McGuire. 1996. Lessons for stock assessment from the northern cod collapse. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6: 125–137.Google Scholar
  54. Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30: 279–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ybarra, P.S. 2016. Writing the goodlife: Mexican American literature and the environment. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Distinguished Research Professor Emeritus, University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations