Advertisement

Norton and Sustainability as Such

  • Paul B. ThompsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 26)

Abstract

Bryan Norton takes the debate over weak and strong sustainability to characterize the key conceptual disagreement among attempts to elaborate a theoretical approach to sustainability. In contrast, I argue that this debate is mired within assumptions of economic development theory that fail to recognize how elements of fragility, stability, resilience and adaptive capability within system design or organization have been material to the way that sustainability has been conceptualized in many domains. Two paradigmatic conceptualizations of sustainability compete within the scholarly literature, one stressing the availability of key resource stocks, the other stressing the robustness and resilience of system organization. A better approach would move beyond weak and strong sustainability to acknowledge a deeper and more philosophically potent set of paradigmatic features within sustainability scholarship.

Keywords

Resources Natural capital Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Resilience Systems thinking 

References

  1. Barnett, H.J., and C. Morse. 1962. Scarcity and growth: The economics of natural resource availability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, M.H., and R.K. Craig. 2014. The end of sustainability. Society and Natural Resources 27: 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biermann, F.K., A.S. Andresen, K. Bäckstrand, S. Bernstein, M.M. Betsill, H. Bulkeley, B. Cashore, J. Clapp, C. Folke, A. Gupta, J. Gupta, P.N. Haas, A. Jordan, N. Kanie, T. Kluvánková-Oravská, L. Lebel, D. Liverman, J. Meadowcroft, R.B. Mitchell, P. Newell, S. Oberthür, L. Olsson, P. Pattberg, R. Sánchez-Rodríguez, H. Schroeder, A. Underdal, S. Camargo Vieira, C. Vogel, O.R. Young, A. Brock, and R. Zondervan. 2012. Navigating the anthropocene: Improving Earth system governance. Science 335: 1306–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza, R., and B.C. Patten. 1995. Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics 15: 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daly, H.E. 2005. Sustainable development—definitions, principles, policies. In The future of sustainability, ed. M. Keiner, 39–53. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Daly, H.E., and J.B. Cobb Jr. 1989. For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Grant, W.E., and P.B. Thompson. 1997. Integrated ecological models: Simulation of socio-cultural constraints on ecological dynamics. Ecological Modeling 100: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grober, U. 2012. Sustainability: A cultural history. Trans. R. Cunningham. Dover, UK: Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman, L.M. 2014. From sustainability to resilience: Why locality matters. Research in Urban Sustainability 14: 341–357.Google Scholar
  10. Kapuria-Foreman, V., and M. Perlman. 1995. An economic historian’s economist: Remembering Simon Kuznets. The Economic Journal 105: 1524–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T.S. 1957. The Copernican revolution; Planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ludwig, D., B. Walker, and C.S. Holling. 1997. Sustainability, stability, and resilience. Conservation Ecology 1: 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ludwig, D., R. Hilborn, and C. Walters. 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: Lessons from history. Ecological Applications 3 (4): 547–549.Google Scholar
  15. Manyena, S.B., and S. Gordon. 2015. Bridging the concepts of resilience, fragility and stabilisation. Disaster Prevention and Management 24: 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meadows, D.H. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer, ed. D. Wright. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Misak, C. 2016. Cambridge pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nordhaus, W.D. 1992. Lethal model 2: Limits to growth revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norton, B.G. 1987. Why preserve natural variety? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Norton, B.G. 1992. Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Norton, B.G. 1995. Evaluating ecosystem states: Two competing paradigms. Ecological Economics 14: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norton, B.G. 2003. Searching for sustainability: Interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Norton, B.G. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norton, B.G. 2007. A reply to my critics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20: 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norton, B.G. 2009. Convergence and Contextualism: Some clarifications and a reply to Steverson. In Nature in common? Environmental ethics and the contested foundations of environmental policy, ed. B. Minteer, 36–48. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Norton, B.G. 2015. Sustainable values, sustainable change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patten, B.C. 1971. Systems analysis and simulation in ecology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin III, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C.A. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P.K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R.W. Corell, V.J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B.H. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J.A. Foley. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rozzi, R. 2012. Biocultural ethics: From biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In Linking ecology and ethics for a changing World, ed. R. Rozzi, S.T.A. Pickett, C. Plamer, J.J. Armesto, and J.B. Callicott, 9–32. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Solow, R.M. 1992. An almost practical step toward sustainability. Washington, DC: Resources for the future.Google Scholar
  31. Svec, P., R. Berkebile, and J.A. Todd. 2012. REGEN: Toward a tool for regenerative thinking. Building Research & Information 40 (1): 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson, P.B. 2007. Norton’s sustainability: some comments on risk and sustainability. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20: 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson, P.B. 2010. The agrarian vision: Sustainability and environmental ethics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker, B.H., D. Ludwig, C.S. Holling, and R.M. Peterman. 1981. Stability of semi-arid savanna grazing systems. The Journal of Ecology 69: 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations