Skip to main content
  • 192 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives the major elements of the current theory and indicates where readers can find more extended discussions. The theory can be described as pragmatic social constructionism. It does not purport to say how “culture,” “society,” or organizations control behavior. It explains how people create organizations in order to control each other. The theory describes the key elements in the process. They are groups of individuals, social idea systems describing reciprocal relations, technical idea systems describing technologies, social charters, symbolic instantiation, and rational thought. For institutions of higher education, the most distinctive and critical social idea system is the definition of a university as a community of scholars and students, but it is not the only one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bailey, F.G. 1977. Morality and Expediency: The Folklore of Academic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. Studies in the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. Social Problems 11 (3): 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program. Edited and Introduced by Anne Warfield Rawls. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, Michael. 1983. Realism in Organizational Theory: A Reassessment. Symbolic Interaction 6 (2): 279–290. Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, Murray J. 1972. Information and Behavior in a Sikh Village. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. “The Message is the Medium: Language, Culture and Informatics”. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, the Journal of the Austrian Society for Cybernetics Studies, Vienna. Dwight Read, Michael Fischer, and Stephen Lyon eds. Taylor and Francis 36 (8): 903–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Experimental Analysis of Kinship. Ethnology 45: 305–330. University of Pittsburg Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Social Organizations and Social Theory. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, Murray J., and Dwight Read. 2012. Human Thought and Social Organization. New York: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Roy. 1974. Are There Social Groups in the New Guinea Highlands? In Frontiers of Anthropology, ed. Murray J. Leaf et al. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leaf, M.J. (2019). The Theory of Organizations. In: An Anthropology of Academic Governance and Institutional Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92588-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92588-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92587-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92588-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics