Collocation Graphs and Networks: Selected Applications
This chapter discusses the notion of collocation graphs and networks, which not only represent visualisation of the collocational relationship traditionally displayed in a tabular form but also constitute a novel analytical technique. This technique, although originally proposed by Philips in 1985, has only recently gained prominence with the introduction of the #LancsBox tool (Brezina et al., Int J Corpus Linguist 20:139–173, 2015), which can, among other things, build collocation graphs and networks on the fly. Simple collocation graphs and collocation networks show association and cross-association between words in language and discourse and can thus be used in a range of areas of linguistic and social research. This chapter demonstrates the use of the collocation network technique in (i) discourse analysis, (ii) language learning research and (iii) lexicography, providing three case studies that focus not only on the variety of applications but also on different methodological choices involved in using the technique.
I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. The work on the chapter was supported by ESRC grants no. EP/P001559/1 and ES/K002155/1.
- Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (Eds.). (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Béjoint, H. (2016). Dictionaries for general users: History and development; current issues. In P. Durkin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lexicography (pp. 7–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brezina, V. (2016). Collocation networks. In P. Baker & J. Egbert (Eds.), Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research (pp. 90–107). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics for corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D. (2018). The corpus method. In J. Culpeper, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak, T. McEnery, & F. Katamba (Eds.), English language: Description, variation and context (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Evert, S. (2008). Corpora and collocations. Corpus linguistics. An international handbook, 2, 1212–1248.Google Scholar
- Firth, J. (1957). Papers in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (Eds.). (2012). Electronic lexicography. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- Hanks, P. (2016). Definition. In P. Durkin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lexicography (pp. 94–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McNair, B. (2009). News and journalism in the UK. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Murphy, L. M. (2016). Meaning relations in dictionaries: Hyponymy, meronymy, synonymy, antonymy, and contrast. In P. Durkin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lexicography (pp. 94–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Paquot, M. (2017). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, 0267658317694221.Google Scholar
- Tufte, E. R. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
- Visual Thesaurus (2018). ThinkMap Inc. https://www.visualthesaurus.com/ [accessed 31/03/2018].